Tenants forced into signing ‘rent tracker’ contracts

Tenants forced into signing ‘rent tracker’ contracts

0:06 AM, 6th September 2023, About 8 months ago 24

Text Size

Letting agents say they are being asked by landlords to offer tenants a ‘rent tracker’ agreement – which enables rent rises that follows a rise in the Bank of England base rate.

Research by the i newspaper highlights that the trend appears to be on the rise as landlords pass on the cost of their mortgages to their tenants.

It reports that one tenant in London had to agree to a 20% rent hike, plus a clause that could trigger another increase in six months, to secure her home.

She said she felt like she had no choice, as the demand for rental properties is so high that she would struggle to find another place.

Include the clause in tenancy agreements

The newspaper quotes Marc von Grundherr, of London-based estate agents Benham and Reeves, who reveals that landlords are increasingly asking him to include the clause in tenancy agreements.

He says that the agency has drafted two agreements so far that make clear that rents can be increased if the Bank of England rate rises.

James Lindsay, a Liverpool lettings agent, told i that one landlord had asked for a similar clause after he had agreed something similar with a tenant in another city.

He tells the newspaper that he refused to do it, saying the landlord was trying to ‘game’ the situation in their favour.

Raised its base rate 14 times since the end of 2021

The Bank of England has raised its base rate 14 times since the end of 2021, and it is expected to do so again on 21 September, to 5.5%.

This means that landlords who have variable or tracker mortgages are paying more interest every month.

Some letting agents say they have refused to comply with these requests, as they think it is unfair for tenants who are already facing record-high rents and inflation.

But others have apparently agreed, saying that some landlords are struggling to make ends meet and need to protect themselves from further rate rises.

Renters are facing fierce competition

Rents have soared across the UK over the past year, as the supply of rental properties has not kept up with the demand and now renters are facing fierce competition for every property.

Some letting agents report they receive between 30 and 100 applications per property – which gives landlords more power to impose their terms and conditions on tenants, who often have little room for negotiation.

The i says the situation is likely to worsen as interest rates continue to rise, putting more pressure on landlords and tenants alike.

‘Unusual’ to see these tenancy clauses

A project co-ordinator at Renters’ Rights London, Portia Msimang, says it is ‘unusual’ to see these tenancy clauses – and they typically only apply to those for more than one year.

She says she would advise a tenant not to sign the agreement if there was such a clause.

Shelter’s chief executive, Polly Neate, said that tenants are being back into a corner because they have an impossible choice.

Either they agree to the clause, she says, or they miss out on the property.

A spokesperson from the Department for Levelling-Up, Housing and Communities, told i: “Rents should be agreed between landlords and tenants, and landlords should have a route to change rents, only when it is necessary.

“Our landmark Renters (Reform) Bill currently going through Parliament will deliver a fairer, more secure and higher quality private rented sector.

“It will deliver the government’s commitment of a better deal for renters and landlords by improving the system for both responsible tenants and good landlords.”


Share This Article


Comments

Seething Landlord

19:43 PM, 6th September 2023, About 8 months ago

Reply to the comment left by Judith Wordsworth at 06/09/2023 - 13:10
I do not suppose that anybody would insert such a clause if it were known that the prospective tenant was reliant upon housing benefit.

Teessider

20:39 PM, 6th September 2023, About 8 months ago

Reply to the comment left by Seething Landlord at 06/09/2023 - 19:43
It shouldn’t matter if tenants receive benefits or not.

Landlords are being asked nit to discriminate against claimants. It works both ways,

DPT

8:37 AM, 7th September 2023, About 8 months ago

Reply to the comment left by Teessider at 06/09/2023 - 18:34
I dont think you'll accept my answer, so have a look at this:
https://www.chattertons.com/site/blog/dispute-resolution/a-guide-to-rent-increases-for-residential-landlords

anthony altman

5:03 AM, 8th September 2023, About 8 months ago

Do not forget that crooked and discriminatory renters reform bill states that arrears of housing benefit are not arrears under this legislation so landlords have no right to bring any legal action against a tenant in arrears with housing benefit
This is yet another example of how corrupt the law is blatant discrimination against landlords who have been systematically stripped of any human rights by corrupt politicians and the three multi million pound hate gangs who's orders they follow

Seething Landlord

7:15 AM, 8th September 2023, About 8 months ago

Reply to the comment left by Teessider at 06/09/2023 - 20:39
Under the RRB S13 will be the only means of increasing rent so these clauses will be of very short term effect. In the meantime anybody who tries to include such a clause knowing that the tenant is reliant upon housing benefit would be simply setting up the AST to fail, so why would they do it?

Seething Landlord

7:44 AM, 8th September 2023, About 8 months ago

Reply to the comment left by anthony altman at 08/09/2023 - 05:03In order to take advantage of the provisions that you have mentioned the tenant would have to prove that the arrears were solely due to delay in payment of housing benefit that he was entitled to receive. The main impact of this as far as I can see will be to prevent commencement of ground 8 possession proceedings as soon as the second payment of rent is missed, thus protecting the tenant from eviction due to incompetence or delay on the part of a government department. Whether this is unreasonable is a matter of opinion but it is easy to see how it is consistent with the stated objective of the Bill i.e. to make things fairer for tenants.

Julie Ford

14:38 PM, 8th September 2023, About 8 months ago

Reply to the comment left by Teessider at 06/09/2023 - 12:01
S13 of the Housing act 1988 is very clear in its wording that rent can only be increased once in every 365 days
Also a fixed term contract is exactly that, the terms are fixed

Now, if the LL and tnt come to an agreement outside of the contract that’s different and could see increased more often that once a year. But if the tenant doesn’t give consent then rent can only be increased once a year

DPT

17:05 PM, 8th September 2023, About 8 months ago

Reply to the comment left by Julie Ford at 08/09/2023 - 14:38Julie, the Act makes it clear that the process only applies to periodic tenancies and says nothing about the use of contractual clauses during a fixed term tenancy.

Seething Landlord

17:21 PM, 8th September 2023, About 8 months ago

Reply to the comment left by Julie Ford at 08/09/2023 - 14:38
It is perfectly possible for the tenancy agreement to include provision for rent increases during the fixed term. The clue is in the name, it's the term that is fixed.

This will of course all change if the RRB comes into force.

Fergus Wilson

8:00 AM, 9th September 2023, About 8 months ago

If Base Rate increases then rents should increase in proportion.

If Base Rate decreases then rent should decease in proportion.

Leave Comments

In order to post comments you will need to Sign In or Sign Up for a FREE Membership

or

Don't have an account? Sign Up

Landlord Tax Planning Book Now