Tenant bidding wars – Why are landlords being blamed?

Tenant bidding wars – Why are landlords being blamed?

9:38 AM, 8th December 2023, About 5 months ago 43

Text Size

Are you sitting comfortably? I’m about to be critical of politicians, the media and tenants.

Because it has been another week and another negative story about landlords.

This time it is the Labour Party saying it will end tenant bidding wars and will copy a law in New Zealand that does just that.

Eh? Landlords aren’t making tenants outbid each other – politicians and tenants are.

Tenants are responding to supply and demand and those that can afford to do it will pay extra to ensure they can house their family.

I don’t condone the practice, but I would ask that with more homes to rent, would politicians step in with a law to protect landlords when tenants start bidding DOWNWARD so landlords are out of pocket?

Thought not. Only when a situation affects tenants will politicians move to defend them.

Landlords and tenants in the private rented sector

But for me, this situation also opens another can of worms for landlords and tenants in the private rented sector.

And it is this: Is there no aspect of a landlord’s business that politicians will not get involved with?

We run a business that delivers a service – a supply of homes that governments for years haven’t stepped up to resolve.

I appreciate that house prices are now outrageous, but landlords didn’t do that. Politicians with their poor economic policies did.

And let’s appreciate what Richard Donnell of Zoopla says this week that the level of immigration is also adding to the rental crisis.

Landlords didn’t do that. Politicians did.

Give a big cheer to Mick Roberts

So, let’s give a big cheer to Mick Roberts, a Nottingham landlord, who put his head above the parapet this week on BBC Radio 5 Live to discuss tenant bidding wars.

I thought he handled himself really well and was given room to explain the issues.

I loved his take on the tenant bidding war when he asked why don’t we stop bidding on house prices.

Genius! It’s a fair point to make in a market of supply and demand.

If a buyer wants a particular house they are prepared to pay more. And when buyers are scarce, they will bid lower – because that’s how supply and demand works.

There’s no talk of legislation to ban bidding on higher house prices.

But it’s always a different story when it applies to landlords.

And the 5 Live presenter did the usual lefty/woke nonsense about housing being a human right.

Is it? Does that mean it should be free? I know there are lots of social housing tenants who think that but for the PRS?

Come on, get some perspective. Property costs money. Someone has to pay.

And if housing is a human right, does that mean I can walk out of Tesco with a bag of free groceries because eating food is my human right?

No, it isn’t. The ‘human right’ only applies to tenants who must deal with awful, exploitative landlords.

Landlords are portrayed badly by the media

The other big issue that I struggle with is not that landlords are portrayed badly by the media, hated by tenant activist groups and tenants (probably).

Or that politicians use the PRS as a political football, it’s this.

I don’t understand why a landlord who is running a business has to have their terms and conditions dictated by other people.

I can’t use websites or buy something without agreeing to their terms and conditions.

We apparently don’t get to have a say in how we run our business, who can live in our home (and it is our home) and how long a tenant can stay in it.

We are always the last to be considered in any legislation, no one consults us – everyone thinks they know how it should be improved.

For tenants obvs, not landlords.

Then there’s the scale of the ‘bidding wars’. Just how often does this happen?

It looks like Labour is playing to the stalls once again and threatening to ban something that isn’t really an issue.

Keeping fed-up landlords in the PRS

At no point do these clowns ever suggest ways for keeping fed-up landlords in the PRS – only ways to victimise us and make us poorer.

I had a friend tell me gleefully the other day that the rental crisis will end when Labour gets in.

I asked why and they said Labour would build houses to solve the problem.

I replied that Labour won’t do it for the same reasons no one has done it for the last 20 years (money, land, NIMBYS and planning departments).

And, to cap it all, Labour won’t like the costs involved.

It’s not going to happen but there’s nothing mentioned about keeping landlords in the PRS. Nothing.

So, here’s a thought for the politicians, media and tenant activist groups.

What do you think will happen when we flex our muscles?

When we collectively decide that ALL new rents will start at double what the last tenant was paying?

Can you imagine the hoo-ha? That’s when campaigners will clamour that something must be done, and our properties will be confiscated.

We meekly surrender because we want to help house people; not exploit them or make their lives worse.

We are good people doing the best we can in the circumstances – even though politicians, the media and tenant groups say otherwise.

It’s a sad, mad world when landlords can be demonised regularly, and no one makes an effort to explain what it is we do.

But wait until we vote with our feet. You might not demonise us when families are living in tents on your High Street.

Until next time,

The Landlord Crusader


Share This Article


Comments

Mark C

17:48 PM, 8th December 2023, About 5 months ago

Reply to the comment left by Easy rider at 08/12/2023 - 17:35
I like that idea as an "opportunity" investment, ie what can I earn with the money I can get out vs the money left in. Nice insight.
Leverage only matters on crystallisation, so if the market drops 30%, I still have invested the same but I don't 'lose' any money unless I sell, so I hold until a more favourable market.
Property is always a long term investment in the PRS.

Dennis Leverett

18:07 PM, 8th December 2023, About 5 months ago

Reply to the comment left by SimonP at 08/12/2023 - 15:33
Not quite that simple in real terms. At point of purchase he has invested £30,000. The value of the house is irrelevant at this point and any equity in the house after all costs only comes into to play when the house is sold. Until its sold there is no profit or loss. I prefer to use the term "return on capital employed". If I'm wrong perhaps someone will correct me.

Steve A

18:24 PM, 8th December 2023, About 5 months ago

Reply to the comment left by The Forever Tenant at 08/12/2023 - 11:25
Private Landlords will always be "scum" since we are too useful to the politicians of all parties as scapegoats.

Joe Pearson

18:33 PM, 8th December 2023, About 5 months ago

Excellent article

Certain newspapers (the Guardian not to name it) run landlords bashing articles every single week..No wonder, we are demonized!
"Bidding wars" to be banned.. they seriously have nothing better to do? If you don't want a "bidding war", simply set your rent at a level that will attract a "high bidder"..

The politicians are trying to "cure the symptoms" rather than the illness because:
,,- it doesn't cost a penny
- landlords are easy scapegoats (thank you The Guardian).

Bottom line: pragmatism will prevail.. same way as they decided to leave Section 21 alone at the last moment.

Gromit

20:26 PM, 8th December 2023, About 5 months ago

Reply to the comment left by Steve A at 08/12/2023 - 18:24
..whipping boy more like!

SimonP

8:35 AM, 9th December 2023, About 5 months ago

Reply to the comment left by Dennis Leverett at 08/12/2023 - 18:07
Actually he paid £100k, £30k was his deposit and the balance of £70k was what he borrowed - his mortgage. There is no escaping the fact that he paid £100k, wherever the money came from.

SimonP

8:38 AM, 9th December 2023, About 5 months ago

Reply to the comment left by Mark C at 08/12/2023 - 16:57Actually you would have paid £100k, £30k was the deposit and the balance of £70k was borrowed - the mortgage. There is no escaping the fact that £100k was paid, wherever the money came from.

I do note that you have only accounted for mortgage interest and agents fees. What about repayment of the loan or is this just an interest-only example?

Easy rider

10:12 AM, 9th December 2023, About 5 months ago

Reply to the comment left by SimonP at 09/12/2023 - 08:38
Many landlords subscribe to the ‘Return on Investment’ method. It helps justify their spending on over-priced property. The U.K. has plenty of over-priced property.

The downside comes when the ROI in negative and their deposit is wiped out by falling prices.

Over the next few years we are likely to see increasing numbers of landlords who are unable to remortgage their BTL properties (due to LTV problems). Those Standard Variable Rates will not look very attractive.

Leverage works both ways.

Mark C

10:33 AM, 9th December 2023, About 5 months ago

Reply to the comment left by SimonP at 09/12/2023 - 08:38
Interest only. Using a limited company which allows for full offset of interest as its a cost of doing business.

Mark C

10:39 AM, 9th December 2023, About 5 months ago

Reply to the comment left by Easy rider at 09/12/2023 - 10:12
Show me a 10 year period where prices have gone down... Of course capital at risk, just like the stock market, which you have no control over.
If you remortgage with the same lending company LTV nor rental cover is a usually a problem.
As I have said before property is a long term investment. My best property now sits on a 53% LTV vs 75% when I bought it 8 years ago.

Leave Comments

In order to post comments you will need to Sign In or Sign Up for a FREE Membership

or

Don't have an account? Sign Up

Landlord Tax Planning Book Now