Shelter demands 12 months of no re-letting in new Bill

Shelter demands 12 months of no re-letting in new Bill

9:50 AM, 11th July 2023, About 10 months ago 56

Text Size

The Levelling Up, Housing and Communities Committee has been told that the Renters (Reform) Bill needs strengthening to prevent landlords from using a loophole to evict tenants for no reason.

The follow-up meeting heard that under the proposals, the law will enable landlords to take possession of their rented property when they or a family member want to move in or to sell it – and there will be a period of three months when the property cannot be re-let.

However, Shelter’s policy manager Tarun Bhakta told the committee that the Bill offers ‘a backdoor to ‘no-fault’ evictions’ and he said the no re-letting period should be longer.

He told the committee: “This is a big concern of ours, at the moment a landlord won’t be allowed to put the property back on the market for three months.

“We don’t think that is a strong enough disincentive when misusing those grounds, particularly when you consider that it might be quite difficult to design quite robust evidential requirements for the landlord moving in. It’s really difficult to imagine what that would look like, but we want the government to try their best.”

’12 months for no re-letting is what we are recommending’

He added: “We think there needs to be strong disincentives via the no reletting period so 12 months for no re-letting is what we are recommending.”

And when tenants believe they have been wrongly evicted, tenants should be able to seek compensation and rent repayment orders – and tenants should be given an incentive to bring a case of wrongful eviction to a local authority.

In response, an irritated Ben Beadle, the chief executive of the National Residential Landlords’ Association, said: “This isn’t roulette. It gets tested in court, it goes before a judge, a judge will need to be satisfied that the landlord is telling the truth about selling the property.

“And the last time I checked, if you lied in court, it was perjury so I would say that was a pretty strong disincentive.”

He added: “I don’t know what it is what my friend from Shelter wants to see, whether it is waterboarding or public flogging, but a financial penalty of £30k if you re-let sounds to me to be a lot of money and I think we have to look through the lens of why landlords are selling and the confidence levels in the sector are where we should start rather than having 12 months punishing waits and lots of extended notice periods.”

Turning to Mr Bhakta, Mr Beadle said: “And, actually, do your clients a great disservice.”

Below is Mr Beadle’s response to Mr Bhakta’s comments:

Watch the full committee exchange on Parliament.tv


Share This Article


Comments

Martin Roberts

9:59 AM, 11th July 2023, About 10 months ago

I guess Shelter just don't want housing available to rent.

Lee Bailey

10:02 AM, 11th July 2023, About 10 months ago

Then I will DOUBLE rents. I have already done so on new tenancies.

Keep going Shelter, your lefty marxist ideologies will only hurt those you claim to support.

Seething Landlord

10:11 AM, 11th July 2023, About 10 months ago

What I found interesting was the reaction of Tarun Bhakta when it was pointed out that the abolition of S21 will bring transparency to the true reason for eviction and that the resultant CCJ will make it very difficult for rent defaulters and anti social tenants to find a private landlord willing to let to them in future.

His suggestion that this would amount to discrimination and should be legislated against was pounced on and rejected by Ben Beadle in no uncertain terms. Is it possible that Shelter are actually starting to worry about the unintended consequences of their campaign to abolish "no fault evictions"?

dismayed landlord

10:12 AM, 11th July 2023, About 10 months ago

Re: A whole year off no letting? I 'd be happy with that - providing I can get a court order to get the tenants out to start with! Also with a whole year of an empty property that should increase the rents even more when re-let, at least enough to cover the CTAX and utilities for the year when its left empty. Wonder who at Shelter is using the brain cell this week?
As to the perjury threat - there is no such problem to some of these tenants and in all my time in court a judge has never imposed any penalties.

Kevin Wade

10:26 AM, 11th July 2023, About 10 months ago

What Shelter should concentrate on is teaching tenants to value their tenancy such that evection is the only course left to the LL.

Perhaps if a tenant is evicted for a fault reason such as none payment or other breach of contract and ignoring preventative remedy intervention they too should be barred from holding a tenancy for 12 months.

Apart from sale or personal housing requirements, why ever wound a LL get rid of a good tenant?

Sheralyne Stamp

10:27 AM, 11th July 2023, About 10 months ago

As a small letting agent, I see many different organisations offering their opinion.
When are the government and associations that landlords pay into going to listen and stand up for the landlords.
It is clear to you and I that these people do not live in the real world.
The only genuine reason a landlord would serve notice is for arrears, ASB or to sell or move back into their property. WHY on earth would landlords evict good tenants. Yet these organisations (do gooders) are poking the bear and the bear will bite back as has been seen with so many landlords selling up. It is the do gooders that have no idea that are making people homeless not decent landlords.

DC

10:55 AM, 11th July 2023, About 10 months ago

Well said Mr Beadle!

david porter

10:59 AM, 11th July 2023, About 10 months ago

Reply to the comment left by dismayed landlord at 11/07/2023 - 10:12
Tennants will not get punished for perjury. My father 50 years ago said
"How do you know a tennant is lying?
Lips are moving!"

david porter

11:05 AM, 11th July 2023, About 10 months ago

Reply to the comment left by Harjit Mahal at 11/07/2023 - 11:03
"good old days when the government had the means to look after its citizens and private business was just private."
When were those good old days?
Did they ever exist?

Peter Merrick

11:27 AM, 11th July 2023, About 10 months ago

Reply to the comment left by Seething Landlord at 11/07/2023 - 10:11
The lack of S21 could ultimately be a huge deterrent to rogue tenants as they will know that the landlord will have no option but to get a court order or CCJ for arrears or suchlike. No LA would house them in future as they are voluntarily homeless and once it is on their credit file, virtually no private landlord or agency is going to touch them with a bargepole either. So they will find it extremely difficult to get a permanent place to live in the future. This should give a landlord good leverage in ensuring reasonable behaviour or negotiating an exit strategy.
Overall, the abolition of S21 is likely to make life harder for tenants.

1 2 3 4 5 6

Leave Comments

In order to post comments you will need to Sign In or Sign Up for a FREE Membership

or

Don't have an account? Sign Up

Landlord Tax Planning Book Now