1 year ago | 39 comments
Nearly a third of renters claim they would risk moving in a pet or partner without permission from their landlord, according to a new survey.
Data from Homeprotect reveals a surge in demand for pet-friendly rentals, with over 1,300 people searching for them each month in the UK.
The news comes after a previous report by Zero Deposit revealed just 8% of private rented sector homes are pet-friendly.
Under the Renters’ Rights Bill, landlords cannot unreasonably refuse tenants’ requests to keep pets in their homes, but they will be allowed to require tenants to have insurance coverage for any potential pet-related damage.
According to the Homeprotect survey, regional data showed that almost half of Greater London residents (46%) would move a partner or pet into their rental home without informing their landlord.
The research also revealed this was higher for men (33%) than women (29%) and younger people, with over half of respondents from Generation Z saying they would do it without informing their landlord, compared with just 7% of the Silent Generation (79+).
Renters in the South West and South East are among the most likely to play by the rules, with 66% and 63% respectively saying they wouldn’t move a partner or pet into their rental without permission.
However, in both regions, those willing to take the risk were more likely to do so for a pet than a partner, which Homeprotect says suggests renters are more inclined to bend the rules for pets than for their significant others.
Northern Ireland renters sat in the middle ground overall but showed the strongest preference for pets over partners.
Among those willing to bend the rules, nearly one in five said they would risk secretly moving in a pet, but not a partner, the largest pet-first disparity across all UK regions.
However, David Joyson, Homeprotect’s Chief Customer Officer, warns tenants not to take the risk of letting in pets or partners without permission.
He said: “Whether for love or otherwise, it’s always best to play by the rules of your tenancy agreement and seek your landlord’s permission before moving a partner or pet in. If they say yes, let your insurer know if a partner or pet is moving in with you.
“And if your landlord doesn’t allow it in your terms, it’s best to find another property that better suits your needs.”
He adds tenants may be held responsible for any damage.
He said: “Pets can introduce new risks, such as damage to furniture or flooring, so tenants may need to update their policy or consider additional cover to ensure they’re protected. If damage occurs and the pet hasn’t been declared, or if appropriate cover isn’t in place, tenants could find themselves footing the bill.”
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Previous Article
Council plans to curb use of letting boards
1 year ago | 39 comments
1 year ago | 2 comments
1 year ago | 5 comments
Sorry. You must be logged in to view this form.
Member Since February 2018 - Comments: 627
10:39 AM, 6th May 2025, About 11 months ago
In many instances, pets may not only be prohibited in a tenancy agreement but also the terms of a landlords lease, in this building it includes fish and birds and we have successfully ejected a parrot.
Pet damage may not of course be limited to the confines of an apartment, who will pay for any rectification of the common parts, the leaseholder of course, more places are being offered on a lpet friendly basis’, there’s no need to force those not wishing, or able (what about asthmatics?) to share space with furry animals to do so
Member Since October 2011 - Comments: 136
10:46 AM, 6th May 2025, About 11 months ago
Nothing new there then! That’s always happened.
Member Since December 2023 - Comments: 1573
12:19 PM, 6th May 2025, About 11 months ago
I have no problem with pets (my properties are suitable).
I do have a problem with other adults moving. Right to rent and the risk of creating g an HMO are two of my concerns.
I also have a problem with rudeness. I consider it rude to breach the tenancy agreement as much as I consider it rude to ban pets for no good reason.
Member Since January 2017 - Comments: 110
2:23 PM, 6th May 2025, About 11 months ago
How about a £30,000 fine for tenants that break the rules? Treat both landlords and tenants the same.
Member Since April 2025 - Comments: 9
2:24 PM, 6th May 2025, About 11 months ago
And then cry like a baby when you evict them for breaching the lease!
Member Since January 2015 - Comments: 1431 - Articles: 1
4:10 PM, 6th May 2025, About 11 months ago
Nothing new there.
Cat/Dog fleas cause hundreds if not thousands of pounds worth of damage and can travel from room to room and one flat to another.
Member Since December 2021 - Comments: 161
9:27 AM, 12th May 2025, About 11 months ago
“Partner or Pet?”
come on, completely different scenarios.
If a tenant does a bunk and leaves a dog behind, you just drop it off at the local dogs home, problem solved. If they leave an ex-partner insitu, you’ve got a completely different problem!
Damage, while I’ve suffered pet damage, I’ve suffered much worse “human damage”.
My insurer now offers £5k pet insurance add on for £25 a year, just invoice the tenant for the £25, which I’m sure they will all pay, and get on with it.