1 month ago | 4 comments
From 1 May 2026, England’s rental market is set to undergo its most significant regulatory reform in decades. Alongside headline changes such as the abolition of Section 21 “no fault” evictions, the Renters’ Rights Act (RRA) introduces a new statutory right for tenants to request permission to keep a pet in the property.
In this article, we explore what this means in practice, the steps landlords should take if they receive a pet request and how new tools like Flow Legal can help landlords understand and manage changing obligations.
Before the RRA, landlords generally had broad discretion over whether pets were permitted, often through “no pets” clauses in tenancy agreements. That changes from 1 May 2026.
Under the RRA, a new term will be implied into periodic assured tenancies. Regardless of what the contract says, tenants will have the right to make a formal written request to keep a pet.
As a landlord, you will generally be expected to:
Pets are presumed to be permitted unless there is a legitimate reason to refuse them.
The key question is whether the pet is suitable for the property and circumstances. This should be assessed case by case. Examples of potentially reasonable grounds include:
Each case will depend on its facts, so documenting your reasoning will be important.
Potentially, yes. If you reject a pet request, a tenant may challenge the decision. That makes record-keeping important. Make sure you keep records of the type of pet requested, the grounds of your decision and all communication with the tenant.
A poorly documented refusal (or no response at all) is much harder defend in court should you get challenged.
Keeping a pet without permission may still amount to a breach of the tenancy agreement. However, from 1 May 2026, enforcement options may become more limited in practice.
With the abolition of Section 21, landlords will generally need to rely on statutory possession grounds instead. Some of those grounds are discretionary, meaning a court may consider whether possession is a proportionate response in the circumstances. For example, a serious nuisance caused by an animal may be viewed differently from an unauthorised hamster causing no issues.
Given the time and cost of court proceedings, your best bet is resolving the issue with your tenant amicably. If the pet is one you would likely have approved anyway, formalising consent in writing may be more sensible than raising a dispute.
Although outright bans may be harder to justify, landlords may still be able to grant consent subject to reasonable conditions. Examples include:
Conditions should be proportionate and relevant to the specific circumstances.
The 5-week cap on deposits still applies, so you can’t request a specific pet deposit.
Some landlords may look to insurance as an alternative way to manage risk. However, insurance can’t be a condition for approving the request. While Insurance conditions were originally included in the draft bill, these were removed as part of the legislative process as it was considered a financial burden on tenants.
Guide dogs and other recognised assistance animals are generally not treated in the same way as ordinary pets. Under Equality Act 2010 UK, landlords may need to permit assistance animals as part of making reasonable adjustments for disabled tenants, depending on the circumstances.
The pet changes are only one part of a much wider overhaul of landlord obligations. If you own rental property, now is the time to review how you manage compliance, documentation, and tenant requests. New tools like Flow Legal Properties are emerging to help landlords stay informed, organised, and prepared.
About the author:
Alex is the founder of Flow Legal, a legal tech startup helping landlords understand and comply with their obligations under the Renters’ Rights Act in a simple, easy and cost-effective way. To learn more visit: https://property.flow.legal
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Previous Article
Rents rise as tenant demand rebounds
1 month ago | 4 comments
1 month ago | 21 comments
Sorry. You must be logged in to view this form.
Member Since January 2015 - Comments: 1478 - Articles: 1
11:16 AM, 25th April 2026, About 4 weeks ago
Pretty sure that under the RRA “Professional end-of-tenancy cleaning” is now an unenforceable clause for whatever reason.
Member Since October 2020 - Comments: 1200
11:46 AM, 25th April 2026, About 4 weeks ago
Reply to the comment left by Judith Wordsworth at 11:16
In that form the clause has been enforceable since 2019. However, I see no reason why a clause saying “the property should be cleaned to a professional standard” would have a problem.
Member Since May 2024 - Comments: 6
12:18 PM, 25th April 2026, About 4 weeks ago
Would it be legally valid to have a rental price for no pet and a higher rental price with pet to reflect the increased risk to the landlord?
Seems reasonable to me, but what do I know?
Member Since May 2014 - Comments: 204
4:02 PM, 25th April 2026, About 4 weeks ago
Reply to the comment left by JB at 20/04/2026 – 15:17
JB, may I respectfully suggest that you change your vet. I’ve just had much the same but without the blood test, at Pets at Home. Three visits at an average cost of £85 per visit.
But that’s not what we’re here for. I have no objections to having well behaved dogs. Of course I have to meet them first. The worst that I’ve ever had was excrement on the lawn. But I called the tenant back to clear it up and he did.
Member Since May 2014 - Comments: 204
4:09 PM, 25th April 2026, About 4 weeks ago
As a LL who readily accepts pets, I am about to rent a property in a new area as a test before I buy there. The problem is that if I turn up with my well behaved Spaniel and somebody else turns up with none. Who is the LL going to choose? Them.
And there’s nothing I can do about it.
Member Since May 2017 - Comments: 783
4:30 PM, 25th April 2026, About 4 weeks ago
Reply to the comment left by Neilt at 25/04/2026 – 16:02
After eating part of a dead rat on a walk by the river we visited an emergency out of hours vet, my own vet several times, had blood tests, urine tests, Ultrasound, a couple of sessions on a drip and 3 types of meds. My vet is reasonably priced but last week cost just shy of £1,000 and we’re not finished yet. Shes also been incontinent.
The moral of the story is that tenants need to be able to afford a pet (they’re not disposable) and be responsible for damages
Member Since October 2020 - Comments: 1200
5:26 PM, 25th April 2026, About 4 weeks ago
Reply to the comment left by DPT at 25/04/2026 – 11:46
My previous post should say unenforceable, not enforceable.
Member Since May 2016 - Comments: 1582 - Articles: 16
8:29 AM, 27th April 2026, About 3 weeks ago
Landlords know by experience, that what the tenant ” Should ” do is meaningless.
In most cases, a Landlord finds out a tenant has got a pet on a periodic visit and there’s nothing legally ( effective ) a Landlord can do about it.
The prospect of getting a Possession order because Tenant has got a pet, is less chance than winning the lottery !
Member Since September 2018 - Comments: 3576 - Articles: 5
8:50 AM, 27th April 2026, About 3 weeks ago
There is nothing in the RRA that I can see that says you can’t request a pet guarantor IF you decided to agree to permission. The fact a LL cannot raise the rent, take a pet deposit and there is no way of being able to recoup the cost of an any extra costs (even if you could insuring your own property against tenant pet damage) then it seems to me that could a guarantor be requested to cover pet damage?
The likelihood of anyone willingly stepping forward to do this would be really low I expect, so that could also be the very same ‘reasonable’ excuse you could then use to refuse?
Member Since July 2013 - Comments: 2017 - Articles: 21
10:39 AM, 27th April 2026, About 3 weeks ago
Reply to the comment left by caringlandlord at 12:18
“Would it be legally valid to have a rental price for no pet and a higher rental price with pet to reflect the increased risk to the landlord?”
Almost certainly not as the RRA ties you up in knots. You must advertise the property at a fixed rent. If a tenant asks for a pet before the tenancy is signed, you cannot demand or accept a single penny more than the advertised rent, even if the tenant offers it. If you do you may be fined up to £7000.
Once the tenancy is signed, if the tenant asks for a pet you cannot increase the rent as a condition of agreeing.
If you have provisionally accepted a lower than advertised rent, and the prospective tenant then asks about a pet and you agree provided the rent is increased back to the advertised amount, you are open to the one way bet challenge by the tenant that the rent is above market rent on the basis that the market rent was no higher than the reduced rent you were prepared to accept. I anticipate the court/tribunal will favour the tenant. At best you will have to spend a lot of time gathering evidence as to market rents.