2 weeks ago | 4 comments
From 1 May 2026, England’s rental market is set to undergo its most significant regulatory reform in decades. Alongside headline changes such as the abolition of Section 21 “no fault” evictions, the Renters’ Rights Act (RRA) introduces a new statutory right for tenants to request permission to keep a pet in the property.
In this article, we explore what this means in practice, the steps landlords should take if they receive a pet request and how new tools like Flow Legal can help landlords understand and manage changing obligations.
Before the RRA, landlords generally had broad discretion over whether pets were permitted, often through “no pets” clauses in tenancy agreements. That changes from 1 May 2026.
Under the RRA, a new term will be implied into periodic assured tenancies. Regardless of what the contract says, tenants will have the right to make a formal written request to keep a pet.
As a landlord, you will generally be expected to:
Pets are presumed to be permitted unless there is a legitimate reason to refuse them.
The key question is whether the pet is suitable for the property and circumstances. This should be assessed case by case. Examples of potentially reasonable grounds include:
Each case will depend on its facts, so documenting your reasoning will be important.
Potentially, yes. If you reject a pet request, a tenant may challenge the decision. That makes record-keeping important. Make sure you keep records of the type of pet requested, the grounds of your decision and all communication with the tenant.
A poorly documented refusal (or no response at all) is much harder defend in court should you get challenged.
Keeping a pet without permission may still amount to a breach of the tenancy agreement. However, from 1 May 2026, enforcement options may become more limited in practice.
With the abolition of Section 21, landlords will generally need to rely on statutory possession grounds instead. Some of those grounds are discretionary, meaning a court may consider whether possession is a proportionate response in the circumstances. For example, a serious nuisance caused by an animal may be viewed differently from an unauthorised hamster causing no issues.
Given the time and cost of court proceedings, your best bet is resolving the issue with your tenant amicably. If the pet is one you would likely have approved anyway, formalising consent in writing may be more sensible than raising a dispute.
Although outright bans may be harder to justify, landlords may still be able to grant consent subject to reasonable conditions. Examples include:
Conditions should be proportionate and relevant to the specific circumstances.
The 5-week cap on deposits still applies, so you can’t request a specific pet deposit.
Some landlords may look to insurance as an alternative way to manage risk. However, insurance can’t be a condition for approving the request. While Insurance conditions were originally included in the draft bill, these were removed as part of the legislative process as it was considered a financial burden on tenants.
Guide dogs and other recognised assistance animals are generally not treated in the same way as ordinary pets. Under Equality Act 2010 UK, landlords may need to permit assistance animals as part of making reasonable adjustments for disabled tenants, depending on the circumstances.
The pet changes are only one part of a much wider overhaul of landlord obligations. If you own rental property, now is the time to review how you manage compliance, documentation, and tenant requests. New tools like Flow Legal Properties are emerging to help landlords stay informed, organised, and prepared.
About the author:
Alex is the founder of Flow Legal, a legal tech startup helping landlords understand and comply with their obligations under the Renters’ Rights Act in a simple, easy and cost-effective way. To learn more visit: https://property.flow.legal
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Previous Article
Rents rise as tenant demand rebounds
2 weeks ago | 4 comments
2 weeks ago | 20 comments
Sorry. You must be logged in to view this form.
Member Since May 2016 - Comments: 1580 - Articles: 16
2:20 PM, 27th April 2026, About 1 day ago
Reply to the comment left by Reluctant Landlord at 27/04/2026 – 08:50
I think the advice to most Landlords Post-RRA, is to require a Guarantor from EVERY Tenant.
Member Since September 2018 - Comments: 3548 - Articles: 5
3:19 PM, 27th April 2026, About 1 day ago
Reply to the comment left by Chris @ Possession Friend at 27/04/2026 – 14:20
I believe this is also a no – no? You cannot stipulate you need a g’tor as standard.
Or are you saying so as NOT to be discriminatory every T must be able to provide one, but it will be dependant on referencing/selection as to if one will be needed or not?
Member Since October 2020 - Comments: 1186
4:20 PM, 27th April 2026, About 1 day ago
Reply to the comment left by Reluctant Landlord at 27/04/2026 – 15:19
I dont think theres anything in yhe legislation to say that you cant require a guarantor as standard. I read something about Ministers not being happy if that’s what landlords do, so I guess they might legislate further in future.
Member Since May 2016 - Comments: 1580 - Articles: 16
6:30 PM, 27th April 2026, About 1 day ago
Reply to the comment left by DPT at 27/04/2026 – 16:20
Exactly, Landlords aren’t happy with RRA, so that makes things equal. 😉
Ministers not being happy is totally different to being legislatively prevented.
For example, a Tenant on benefit that might be on the borderline of being ‘questionable’ with regards to affordability, may well be granted a tenancy if their rent could be guaranteed, – via a relative / Guarantor.