4 weeks ago | 20 comments
A landlord association has urged the Chancellor to support landlords for the upcoming Autumn Budget.
The National Residential Landlords Association (NRLA) has written a budget submission to the government calling for a tax system that supports the private rented sector.
The association is also urging the government to unfreeze Local Housing Allowance (LHA) rates.
There have previously been calls from tenant groups to bring Capital Gains Tax (CGT) rates into line with Income Tax rates.
The CGT rates for residential property in England are currently 18% for gains falling within an individual’s basic-rate band and 24% for gains taxed at the higher or additional rate.
Landlords pay Income Tax on their rental profits at rates of 20%, 40% and 45%. From 6 April 2027, separate rates for property income will increase by two percentage.
The NRLA opposes proposals to bring CGT rates on residential property into line with Income Tax rates. Instead, it has proposed reforms to make CGT more closely reflect genuine economic gains.
In its budget submission, the NRLA proposes two linked reforms: “Index the allowable base cost of residential property for inflation using CPI. The base cost should include the original purchase price, Stamp Duty and other acquisition costs, together with qualifying capital improvements, with each indexed from the date on which the expenditure was incurred.
“Grade the maximum relief available according to the length of ownership. A property disposed of within three years would receive no relief, with the maximum amount available increasing progressively according to the period for which the property had been held.”
The NRLA adds that safeguards must apply and said: “The relief must never create or increase an allowable capital loss. Secondly, it must never exceed the inflation actually experienced. The purpose of the reform is to prevent inflation being taxed as a genuine gain, not to shelter real increases in value from CGT.
“The reform would address both fairness and economic efficiency. It would ensure that CGT focuses more closely on genuine economic gains, while reducing the incentive for owners to retain properties simply to avoid crystallising a substantial tax charge.
“In turn, this would allow capital to move more freely to where it can be put to better use, including investment in new rental properties and improvements to existing stock. This will become increasingly important as landlords need to invest in meeting new minimum energy efficiency requirements and the Decent Homes Standard.”
During the Autumn Budget 2025, ministers announced that LHA rates will remain frozen for a second consecutive year in 2026/27.
The NRLA has called for the government to unfreeze LHA rates and re-link them to at least the lowest 30% of rents.
The NRLA says: “Continuing to freeze LHA rates undermines some of the core objectives of the Renters’ Rights Act, which seeks to improve access to the sector for, among others, those in receipt of benefits.
“We recognise concerns in government that increasing LHA rates inflates market rents, placing too much pressure on public finances. However, the evidence does not appear to support this. Our analysis shows that, between the introduction of the LHA rate in April 2008 and the freezing of the rate in March 2016, average weekly rents across England increased by an average of 2.7% a year.
“In contrast, between April 2016 and March 2025, when LHA rates were frozen (with the exception of 2020/21 and 2024/25), average weekly rents increased by an average of 3.4% a year. Rents therefore rose faster while LHA rates were frozen than while they were being uprated.”
The association is also calling for greater investment in the workforce needed to retrofit the UK’s housing stock.
The government has proposed that all privately rented properties will need to meet an EPC C standard by 2030. The NRLA argues that urgent reform to the tax treatment of energy-efficiency investments is needed if the government’s plans are to be successful.
The NRLA says: “We are calling on the government to classify specific investments in energy-efficiency measures as revenue expenses, and therefore deductible against profits in the year they are incurred for Income Tax purposes.”
6 comments on this article
A different perspective could help you spot an issue, avoid a mistake or find a better way forward. Read the comments and add your own views if you wish.
4 weeks ago | 20 comments
3 months ago | 1 comments
3 months ago | 27 comments
Member Since June 2015 - Comments: 361
11:57 AM, 14th September 2026, About 3 weeks ago
All sensible proposals.
Indexation and taper relief would encourage those of us who had hoped to retire at some point to actually do so. Does anyone really want landlords to carry on until they die? When we bought some of the properties there was a very different tax regime in place. How many of us would have got involved if the government had been honest about how they were planning to change the system? If indexation or taper relief was restored I wouldn’t care if the CGT rate matched my tax rate. 40% or 45% of an indexed gain is far more palatable than 24% on the whole gain. There may be a small drop in CGT receipts but a major uplift in SDLT and VAT on all the extra transactions plus a boost to employment in the legal and construction industries.
Unfreezing LHA is long overdue. Of course other rents go up more when LHA is frozen. Those of us with mixed portfolios have to cover our ever increasing costs somehow and some of our UC tenants simply don’t have the ability to pay more. It largely depends on whether they have children or not. Single adults have no chance of paying more than LHA (unless they’re working cash in hand or receiving PIP), while families with children often have a dazzling array of disregarded income that can be used to bridge the gap. LHA is currently somewhere between about £200 and £500 per month below 30th percentile rents. If it was increased appropriately it would be virtually self funding with a combination of the 40% or 60% tax landlords pay plus the extra 2% on our tax rate and the savings that would be made on emergency housing for homeless families.
Member Since April 2020 - Comments: 129
12:07 PM, 14th September 2026, About 3 weeks ago
Great to see our representative body doing something supportive regarding this important dilemma. Let’s hope its not too little too late bearing in mind the budget is just around the corner.
Member Since January 2017 - Comments: 136
6:51 PM, 14th September 2026, About 3 weeks ago
Where everyone including govenments miss the point is, maintenance costs have risen far higher than inflation as have other landlord costs, – insurance, mortgages, accountant fees, etc., then add in MTD fees, database fees and other fees likley down the road.
So, your not able to increase rents enough to cover this, so your loosing money on the previous year in many cases. To the point for many where it’s not worth the effort, or better returns are easily achiveable for less risk.
THIS is what the likes of the NRLA NEED to convey to govenments, so those thickheads running things can understand why landlords increase the rent.
Member Since May 2024 - Comments: 166
1:33 PM, 15th September 2026, About 3 weeks ago
Not this old chestnut of bringing capital gains “into line” with income tax rates. By all means do this as long as you also include a £12570 nil band for every financial year the investment was held….
Member Since December 2013 - Comments: 184
7:46 PM, 15th September 2026, About 3 weeks ago
Sorry ‘Our Ben’- never going to happen in a million years- and you know it.
Sorry, but this smacks of him just making noises to justify being head of a landlord organisation that has made next to no effort to do anything at all (apart from rake money in from selling courses) to support landlords from government attacks.
The bloke makes my blood boil
Member Since May 2023 - Comments: 31
11:32 AM, 19th September 2026, About 2 weeks ago
Reply to the comment left by Saul Smart at 15/09/2026 – 19:46
Sadly, your reaction is exactly what Labour want.
A rabid capitalist railing against NRLA.
You are squabbling with those who have to deal with self-righteous do-gooders in Labour.
None of the cabinet have ever had a private sector job.
You are a cash cow to fund all those not working and drawing benefits.