2 months ago | 1 comments
Less than 2% of private rented homes are affordable to people on housing benefit, as charities call on the government to unfreeze Local Housing Allowance (LHA) rates.
Data from Zoopla reveals that fewer than two in 100 private rental properties listed across Britain (1.9%) are now affordable for people receiving housing benefit.
The average gap between housing benefit payments and the cheapest third of rents for a two-bedroom home has reached £403 per month.
Citizens Advice, Crisis and other housing charities are urging the government to unfreeze LHA rates, warning that keeping them frozen will push more households towards homelessness.
According to data from Crisis and Zoopla, just 1.2% of properties in London were considered affordable for households relying on housing benefit. Wales was the worst-affected nation, with only 0.7% of private rental properties advertised being affordable, compared with 1.8% in England and 5.5% in Scotland.
Citizens Advice also reported that more than 6,600 private renters in England and Wales with housing benefit issues needed to access food banks, a 79% increase from just 3,700 people in 2021/22.
Matt Downie, chief executive at Crisis, has called on the government to unfreeze LHA rates to tackle the cost-of-living crisis.
He said: “Across Britain, people on low incomes are facing an impossible situation. With housing benefit frozen, more and more people are struggling to cover the cost of rent and essentials like food and bills, forcing them into a cycle of debt, poverty and homelessness.
“What’s more, the freeze puts unsustainable pressure on an already overworked system. With local authorities already under immense strain and temporary accommodation costs at an all-time high, without urgent change we will only see more people trapped in this vicious cycle.
“To bring rates of homelessness down, we must have a welfare system that supports people on the lowest incomes. It’s crucial that housing benefit is uprated to cover the cheapest third of rents so it can work as intended and so that no one is faced with the trauma of losing their home.”
Dame Clare Moriarty, chief executive of Citizens Advice, added: “Many families are already at breaking point, cutting spending back to the bone and still finding themselves unable to pay the rent or put food on the table.
“Every day our advisers are hearing from more and more people who have simply run out of options. While housing benefit remains frozen, rents are spiralling, meaning private renters are cutting back, going without, or falling deeper into debt.
“If the government is serious about turning the tide on the cost-of-living crisis, getting to grips with the soaring cost of housing is essential. Private renters are struggling to keep their heads above water; unfreezing housing benefit would throw them a vital lifeline.”
According to Citizens Advice, nearly half of private renters (48%) in the UK receiving Universal Credit in the UK have had to cut back on essentials like food, transport and energy costs in the last six months.
The data also reveals that the number of private renters with housing benefit issues needing support with rent arrears has increased by nearly 20% over the past four years, while those requiring advice on homelessness rose by 58% over the same period.
As previously reported by Property118, the government has defended freezing LHA rates, claiming a range of factors were considered before the freeze, including “the challenging fiscal context”.
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
2 months ago | 1 comments
3 months ago | 3 comments
Member Since September 2018 - Comments: 3661 - Articles: 5
1:51 PM, 8th July 2026, About 3 days ago
a combo of targeted (anti LL) costs all being factored into the rent.
While LHA rates may not have increased each year, the other benefits that claimants received DO increase year on year. It is from this benefit income that claimants are expected to put towards and pay for the difference in LHA and actual rent.
What if the benefits (that all have to be counted for non discriminatory ‘income’ assessment) were reduced and put directly towards the increase in LHA subsidy?
Would make no difference to claimant as it still all goes towards their housing costs. ,
Member Since June 2019 - Comments: 886
4:21 PM, 8th July 2026, About 3 days ago
And if they were unfrozen, how long for? The government seems to have little idea how unattractive the housing of benefit claimants has become in the new renting regime.
Member Since September 2018 - Comments: 3661 - Articles: 5
4:26 PM, 8th July 2026, About 3 days ago
Reply to the comment left by Paul Essex at 08/07/2026 – 16:21
if anything the call will probably come from the screaming tenant groups that this has to be increased every year along with benefits….