Thousands of older private renters in poverty due to LHA shortfall

Thousands of older private renters in poverty due to LHA shortfall

Elderly woman counts coins from her purse to illustrate Local Housing Allowance shortfalls for older renters
12:01 AM, 23rd April 2026, 3 weeks ago 3

More than 30,000 older private renters would be pulled out of poverty if Local Housing Allowance (LHA) matched actual rents, according to new research.

Data by Independent Age reveals 270,422 older private renters currently have a shortfall between their rent and the rate of Local Housing Allowance.

LHA sets the maximum level of rent support available to claimants, but rates have been frozen for a second consecutive year for 2026/27.

Renters on a low income of all ages is dire

According to government figures, more than one-third (34%) of older private renters receiving Housing Benefit are now in poverty.

Joanna Elson CBE, chief executive at Independent Age, said: “The situation for many renters on a low income of all ages is dire.

“Our research shows that not uprating Local Housing Allowance so that it keeps pace with rising rents has a very direct impact on the lives of older private renters.

“We know that some are having to choose whether they skip meals, use their lights at night, or keep a roof over their head.”

Older renters at risk of homelessness

Independent Age is calling on the government to reinstate LHA rates to cover at least the lowest 30% of rents from next year.

As previously reported on Property118, only 1% of London rental homes are affordable under LHA rates.

Ms Elson said: “The least the UK government must do is uprate Local Housing Allowance so it covers the cheapest 30% of the market, as it has previously done. Currently, the measure is falling ever further behind rents and we know that, for many, this means cutting back to dangerous levels.

“Many other financial entitlements have been uprated this month, why should Housing Benefit be any different? An adequate level of LHA is crucial to making sure older people in financial hardship have a secure and affordable home. This situation is unsustainable and puts older renters at risk of homelessness. It must be remedied.”


Share This Article

Comments

  • Member Since May 2015 - Comments: 2212 - Articles: 2

    12:08 PM, 23rd April 2026, About 3 weeks ago

    Incredible, I would never have guessed that matching the LHA to the actual cost of accommodation would lift people out of poverty. It is fortunate that someone had the foresight to commission this research as without it nobody would have appreciated the “bleeding obvious”.

  • Member Since September 2018 - Comments: 3569 - Articles: 5

    12:18 PM, 23rd April 2026, About 3 weeks ago

    Reply to the comment left by The_Maluka at 23/04/2026 – 12:08
    the gov would simply increase tax to compensate for the additional housing costs bill…..more taxpayer burden, forcing more to make benefit claims ……?

    Tax spending is the biggest issue above all else. Spending what you don’t have on what you don’t need, always ends up in a crisis. Anything other than a full reset is just peeing in the wind.

  • Member Since May 2018 - Comments: 2053

    1:52 PM, 23rd April 2026, About 3 weeks ago

    Reply to the comment left by The_Maluka at 12:08
    To have foresight you have to have competence.
    The Renters Rights Act bans landlords from taking more than the advertised rent and also bans landlords from taking rent up front. Something that agents have flagged up in the run-up to implementation of the RRB is that some retired people have assets, but not sufficient income; so they can afford to pay rent but they cannot pass the credit-referencing checks. In effect, if the definition of poverty is income-based they can end up being homeless, i.e. unable to find a home even though they have got the cash to pay for it. They become older renters at risk of homelessness because of poorly conceived and poorly implemented legislation.
    During its consultation on the Renters Rights Bill that became the Renters Rights Act the labour government was told that this was a potential problem, but they just were not listening. If government and political parties aspiring to government (like the Greens for example, currently banging on about rent controls) don not listen then unintended consequences happen. There is collateral damage. And just as the collateral damage of older people with assets being unable to rent is one consequence of being banned from making up front rent payments, it might be counter intuitive to people who are actually incompetent, but rising rents are a consequence of rent controls.
    Stopping tenants from offering more than the advertised rent, or limiting rent increases also means that agents change their advice to landlords and advise that rents must be maximised, i.e. advertised at a premium, on first-letting a property. This again is a consequence of government and political parties not listening. It is not the fault of landlords…it is an indirect consequence of incompetence on the part of government, which has arisen as a consequence of a government with a left-wing majority being able to get bad legislation through parliament.

Have Your Say

Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.

Not a member yet? Join In Seconds


Login with

or

Related Articles