Shelter misleading the public about its finances

by Appalled Landlord

9:55 AM, 10th October 2018
About 2 years ago

Shelter misleading the public about its finances

Make Text Bigger
Shelter misleading the public about its finances

If you search on Shelter’s website for Annual Report you will be given a link with that name which takes you to a page called “How we spend your money”

This states, “For every £1 you donate 79p is spent directly on helping people through advice, support and campaigning 21p is spent on fundraising.” Click here

Below this claim is a link to download the annual report for the year to March 2017.

On page 58 (digital page 29) of this, in the section headed “Other information”, the auditors state that they have to check that other information in the annual report is consistent with the audited accounts.

So it’s just as well that the 21p claim is not in the annual report, because the accounts show that it cost £11.0 million to obtain £33.2 million in donations and legacies, which is 33p in the pound.

Below the download button is a pie chart called “How we raise money”. This shows that 15% of their “money” comes from Shelter shops. This makes them seem a significant source of income for the “charity”.

However, they are careful not to call it “income”, and if they had called it “receipts” it might have begged the question of what outgoings were involved, so “money” is a cunning choice of word.

A previous article showed how the cost of shops and their 177 employees cost 92.5p for every £1 of sales: Click Here

The auditors do not let them get away with this trickery in the annual report. A pie chart of expenditure is shown alongside the one for income.

In this comparison, the shops are credited with 14% of Shelter’s “income” and debited with 12% of its expenditure. However, the percentages are put in different segments of the charts, and the credit is in the strongest colour while the debit is in the weakest colour, so the expenditure figure might still be overlooked by a casual reader, leaving him or her with the wrong impression of the contribution from the shops.

A previous article asked whether the truth did not matter to Shelter: Click Here

This included Greg Beales, the Director of Communication, claiming on TV that “people on benefits are very good tenants, landlords make as much profit from people who are on benefits as landlords make from people who aren’t on benefits”.

Beales is a former Downing Street adviser to Prime Ministers Gordon Brown and Tony Blair, and formerly Director of Strategy and Planning for the Labour Party.

Subsequently, Polly Neate, the CEO said on TV “These so-called Section 21 evictions, or no-fault evictions, meaning no fault on behalf of the tenant, are actually the single biggest cause of homelessness in the country now.” Click Here

This was in spite of Shelter’s own web page that gives the lie to her claim: Click Here

Is it my imagination, or has the level of deceit increased since these two were appointed in August/September last year?

Share this article

Twitter Facebook LinkedIn


Larry Sweeney

12:43 PM, 11th October 2018
About 2 years ago

Thank you Peter. Please email us if you have not done so yet. Apologies if you have. The Alliance is more than a proposal. We are set up just awaiting Tech people on Website. What everyone has said about shelter is correct. We are getting the numbers and make no mistake about it, we are going for Shelter. Let them slag landlords, at this stage the more bile they spew the better. They will be seen for what they are. A housing charity that does not house, milking the tax payer. As stated we are getting the numbers and the powers that be are suddenly going to be receiving on an hourly basis a lot of complaints about Shelter.

Monty Bodkin

15:38 PM, 11th October 2018
About 2 years ago

Notably, two big landlord lenders, TMW (Nationwide) and Birmingham Midshires.
Mention your displeasure next time you speak to your mortgage broker.
Same with your B&Q manager (Or Srewfix manager, same group).
As for using British Gas...Nuff said.

Chris @ Possession Friend

16:20 PM, 11th October 2018
About 2 years ago

Reply to the comment left by LANDLORD 35 at 10/10/2018 - 17:17
" involved " is a very ambigous word, almost as vague as their annual accounts. !
apart from trying to advise tenants to breach their tenancy agreement, find loopholes in the myriad of ever-increasingly complex and badly written legislation
( e.g - How 2 Rent fiasco and the Tenancy Prescribed information for pre 2015 tenancies after 2018 )


17:46 PM, 11th October 2018
About 2 years ago

Reply to Appalled Landlord, Shelter are involved in the Housing First project in as much as they are advertising for Senior Support Workers, for this project, "To help people with multiple complex needs to secure accommodation. Operating out of our Dorset Hub in Bournemouth." £26,269 pa closing date 16 Oct 2018. As advertised in Guardian Jobs 4 Oct 2018.

Appalled Landlord

21:32 PM, 11th October 2018
About 2 years ago

Reply to the comment left by LANDLORD 35 at 11/10/2018 - 17:46
I do not understand the point you are making.

Phil Ireland

23:20 PM, 11th October 2018
About 2 years ago

Reply to the comment left by AA at 11/10/2018 - 10:32
I understand your point, and the auditor will get paid for the audit already completed, but maybe the question should be whether their professional reputation is worth more than next years audit fee?

1 2

Leave Comments

Please Log-In OR Become a member to reply to comments or subscribe to new comment notifications.

Forgotten your password?



Winter Economy Plan leaves landlords out in the cold

The Landlords Union

Become a Member, it's FREE

Our mission is to facilitate the sharing of best practice amongst UK landlords, tenants and letting agents

Learn More