Legal expert warns of looming chaos from the Renters (Reform) Bill

Legal expert warns of looming chaos from the Renters (Reform) Bill

10:03 AM, 17th May 2024, About 2 months ago 31

Text Size

The impending passing of the Renters (Reform) Bill spells trouble for tenants and landlords, warns a legal expert.

Ian Narbeth, a commercial property lawyer and BTL and HMO landlord, tells Property118 in a video interview that can be seen below that some Tory MPs have “woken up too late” to the damaging effects the Bill will bring.

Mr Narbeth also explains the big problem that councils are causing by telling tenants threatened with eviction to stay put until the bailiffs arrive.

If a Labour government passes the Renters (Reform) Bill, it may be even worse

The Renters (Reform) Bill has passed its final stage in the House of Commons and is now heading to the Lords.

However, Mr Narbeth warns that damage has already been done. Landlords have been frightened by the prospect of the Bill. He emphasises that the Bill is being brought in because of a few bad landlords in the private rental sector.

He explains: “The small minority of bad landlords who behave badly are the ones causing the problem which is why we are getting this legislation.

“Most landlords don’t want to evict their tenants for no good reason but there are a minority that do. Their tenants justifiably complain and go to people like Shelter and the politicians have been listening to them.”

He says: “The abolition of Section 21 is coming, and landlords need to realise that Labour will not hold off this legislation.

“If the Tories get this Bill passed before the Election, then it’s done, and Labour should leave it alone. If they don’t pass it, then just think about what Labour might do? They will embellish it and may add in provisions that will not be landlord-friendly. It will be a worse Bill than it is already which is my big fear.”

MPs should just get on and make the best out of a bad job

Mr Narbeth says several Conservative MPs have been slow to grasp the potential pitfalls of the Bill.

He said: “A number of Tory MPs have woken up rather too late to realise the problems the Bill will bring and are trying to delay it.

“Saying that ‘until the courts are reformed, we won’t abolish Section 21’ isn’t going to work. The MPs should just get on and make the best of a bad job. It is a bad job, but the Bill has been promised by the Tories, and they should deliver on it.

“I think Michael Gove thought he would get votes from renters but he’s not going to get any extra due to the delay in passing the Bill and now tenants are finding their rents are going up and there is a shortage of housing.

“The Tories have achieved the worst of all worlds: they have a Bill they shouldn’t have been promoting, it’s not winning them any votes and it will harm tenants and landlords.”

Councils are swamped

Property118 has previously highlighted that there is a common practice for councils to tell tenants to remain in their rented home when facing eviction and after receiving a court order to leave – causing stress not just for the tenant but also for the landlord as they deal with the legal costs and complications.

Mr Narbeth comments: “The issue for landlords is having a tenant who’s not paying rent, making the landlord an involuntary creditor. Each day that passes, the debt grows, and the longer it goes on, the harder it is to get the money back, especially if the tenant disappears.”

The Homelessness Code of Guidance says where applicants are threatened with homelessness, councils must take reasonable steps to help prevent it from occurring.

The first step the guidance says: “Housing authorities should not consider it reasonable for an applicant to remain in occupation until eviction by a bailiff.”

Mr Narbeth explains councils are facing a huge strain in trying to re-house people due to shortages.

He said: “Councils are hoping they don’t have to re-house these tenants, and that something will turn up. Councils are swamped already. They are having to pay for people to live in B&Bs and other short-term accommodation.”  By rejecting those who are “voluntarily homeless” (meaning those who actually obey a court order to leave) councils can wash their hands of a problem.

Furthermore, a lot of landlords are now not willing to rent to the council to house tenants because they end up with the worst tenants going into those properties.

Completely unacceptable

The Housing Minister, Jacob Young recently told NRLA members that councils telling tenants to stay put until the bailiffs arrive is ‘completely unacceptable’.

However, Mr Narbeth says this intervention is ineffective.

He said: “The housing minister saying this is completely unacceptable is too little, too late. It’s a shame it’s taken years for the government even to realise that this has been going on, but we’ve had a revolving door of housing ministers so by the time they’ve got their feet under the table they are out doing another job.

“It is a big problem and Parliament needs to impose sanctions on councils, but I don’t see that happening.”

Long process to evict a tenant

Mr Narbeth says the reality for many landlords is that evicting a tenant takes months or even a year or more.

He tells Property118: “It’s one thing trying to get a tenant out after giving them two months’ notice and then dealing with the prolonged court proceedings.

“It’s a long process. It’s two months for the notice, and then if the tenant doesn’t go, you have to apply to get a court date, which could be in six to eight months’ time.

“If the tenant doesn’t leave after the court order, it might be another six to eight weeks before you can get a bailiff.

“You are looking at nine months to a year, and sometimes a lot longer, to get a tenant out.”

Regarding the current massive backlog of cases in the courts, Mr Narbeth emphasises the urgent need for increased funding.

He said: “If I could wave a magic wand, I would sort out the courts! The courts need more judges, and a lot of court buildings are in disrepair and can’t be used which is a huge problem, so we need to have more courts.

Dealing with Anti-social behaviour will be a lot harder

When it comes to evictions and dealing with problem tenants, Mr Narbeth explains that anti-social behaviour is a major issue.

He tells Property118: “Anti-social behaviour is a big problem, and landlords are in the firing line to try and sort it out. One of the main reasons for introducing selective licensing was to deal with anti-social behaviour. By abolishing section 21 evictions, Parliament will take away the most effective tool landlords have for dealing with it.

“If you have to prove anti-social behaviour in court, you need to provide evidence.

“The person giving evidence will be the one on the receiving end of the anti-social behaviour. This could be the neighbour who’s very frightened because the tenant is abusive.

“Can you expect the victim to wait six to nine months and then turn up in court in the hope that the anti-social tenant will be evicted?

“The answer is no as a lot of people will not put themselves through that. If the person on the receiving end of the anti-social behaviour is a tenant, they will likely move out to escape a nasty situation.”

Mr Narbeth explains the Renters (Reform) Bill changes the criteria for proving anti-social behaviour, but it does little to help.  “MPs have just not thought this through at all. They claim they will make it easier to evict for anti-social behaviour but it’s a tiny, tiny change.

“Instead of having to prove conduct likely to cause nuisance or annoyance, it will be conduct capable of causing nuisance or annoyance.

“I can’t imagine people are going to be arguing about the subtle difference. By the time a case gets to court, there will actually be anti-social behaviour.

“I fear this is going to be a problem and the weak and the vulnerable neighbours and other tenants who are affected are going to be the ones that suffer.”

Mr Narbeth says that when s21 goes, there will be no easy way to deal with problem tenants. Approaching a guarantor may help but it’s only a partial solution to the problem. The guarantor may persuade the tenant to moderate their behaviour or to leave.

“However, some guarantors will not want to get involved in the situation.”

EPC targets scrapped

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak scrapped EPC targets last Autumn which would have required landlords to ensure their properties had a minimum EPC rating of C.

The mooted deadline was 2025 for new tenancies and by 2028 for all tenancies.

Landlords would have had to spend thousands of pounds to try to upgrade their properties.

Mr Narbeth says: “Given that upgrading EPC ratings has not been and probably will never be required for owner-occupied properties, a fair solution is that landlords must declare what the EPC rating is. Tenants can then decide whether to pay the asking rent.

“Many properties are difficult, and some all but impossible, to upgrade at reasonable cost. Without vacant possession, it is even harder and more expensive. The suggested figures in EPC certificates vastly under-estimate the true cost and don’t take rental voids into account.

“The clumsy hand of government proposed Draconian fines for landlords and the requirement to spend substantial sums every five years, regardless of the location or value of the property or whether such expenditure would achieve a C rating.

Fortunately, the Civil Service appears to have realised that rendering hundreds of thousands of properties unlettable would not be good for tenants or landlords.

“Whether Labour has the brains to work this out remains to be seen. Furthermore, once section 21 goes, landlords may be stuck with a tenant but unable to upgrade the EPC rating.”

Tenant charities lumps all landlords in the same boat

Mr Narbeth points out a common frustration among landlords that pro-tenant groups tend to paint all landlords with the same brush.

He criticises the current imbalance, noting the lack of support and understanding for responsible landlords.

He says: “There doesn’t seem to be any kind of slacking off and giving landlords a break. It is all stick and very little carrot.

“We do need housing charities to help tenants who are living in substandard accommodation or have abusive landlords, but Shelter and others tend to lump all landlords together.

“The tenant lobby groups don’t seem to realise that what they are asking for often makes things worse overall.

“There are now so many additional risks in being a landlord and obstacles put in a landlord’s way to get their property back that it increases costs, discourages investors and does not increase the supply of houses. Indeed, the opposite which puts upward pressure on rents.”

He laments: “I don’t see the government doing much to change that situation.”


Share This Article


Comments

Michael Booth

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

15:24 PM, 17th May 2024, About 2 months ago

Amazing after a home sec tells councils to stop the practise of telling tenants to remain in property after a court order.it still continues ,they are also contravening two housing laws , so l have come to the conclusion there is two laws in this country one for the landlords and general public and another for councils.

Cider Drinker

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

15:59 PM, 17th May 2024, About 2 months ago

Reply to the comment left by Reluctant Landlord at 17/05/2024 - 10:55If 10 people come in, that’s around 5 to 10 homes that are removed from the available stock. If it’s 10,000, that’s a new small town needed to house migrants.
Of course, it is hundreds of thousands that flood our small country every year (millions over the term of a Parliament).
If this isn’t the number one cause of the housing crisis, I’m Tommy Cooper.

Stopping migration overnight would allow us build new homes to satisfy the current population. It won’t end well.

TheMaluka

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

16:23 PM, 17th May 2024, About 2 months ago

Reply to the comment left by Cider Drinker at 17/05/2024 - 15:59
Now your real identity is revealed, just like that!

Cider Drinker

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

17:18 PM, 17th May 2024, About 2 months ago

Reply to the comment left by TheMaluka at 17/05/2024 - 16:23
Thank you very much.

Peter Merrick

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

22:45 PM, 17th May 2024, About 2 months ago

Reply to the comment left by John Nyari at 17/05/2024 - 10:51
Spot on John, I don't know why most people aren't aware of this. Government and GR, et al were quite open about their belief that landlords were forcing people to rent by buying up all the available inventory, thereby making money at others' expense, and had to be stopped. Hence the draconian anti-landlord measures that have been enacted, starting in the mid 2010s. Nothing has changed since then, other than seeing the consequences of their policies of reducing supply play out amid a background of growing demand and immigration. In the meanwhile, they stick doggedly to the script, hoping that the country will eventually wean itself off it's reliance on the evils of the PRS, as they did a few generations ago.

Mick Roberts

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

8:03 AM, 18th May 2024, About 2 months ago

Ha ha great Ian, watching Crown Court.

Great words Ian.

And loads of others including this: “Whether Labour has the brains to work this out remains to be seen.

Very good, What they are asking for, makes things worse overall.

Wow so the reform bill is bringing in Prescribed stuff to Section 8 as well. They certainly gonna' make more tenants homeless now cause of this. Where is the common sense in this. A paperwork error 10 years ago. More houses with Letting Agents = More expensive rents.
We all saying Ian, we all being more discriminative, much more picky.

GlanACC

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

10:20 AM, 18th May 2024, About 2 months ago

Reply to the comment left by Mick Roberts at 18/05/2024 - 08:03
I guess a possible way round paperwork error of 10 years ago is to issue a completely new AST now with all the correct paperwork (ie this will terminate a periodic tenancy and start a new one)

Jim K

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

11:30 AM, 18th May 2024, About 2 months ago

Reply to the comment left by Reluctant Landlord at 17/05/2024 - 10:55
Hi. To RL and CD.
I read a fair bit of your commentary.
On this occasion I believe you sare both right.
Stopping unfettered arrivals today still leaves hundreds of thousands needing accommodation (a home).
However not stopping it will only make the present situation more imbalanced.
There is a story about a mountain shepherd seeing his sheep being swept past him down a stream.
Does he:
Stay where he is and pull them out one by one or
Does he leave those in the river, go upstream and fix the hole in the fence?
An imperfect analogy I know but the tenet is in both f your conments

Mick Roberts

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

17:54 PM, 18th May 2024, About 2 months ago

Reply to the comment left by GlanACC at 18/05/2024 - 10:20
Easier said than done if you've fell out with tenant & that's why we're going to court.
If this carries on, I'm gonna' to force all mine to sign new with more bulletproof paperwork with 2024 Letting Agents.

Cider Drinker

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

19:24 PM, 18th May 2024, About 2 months ago

Reply to the comment left by Mick Roberts at 18/05/2024 - 17:54
And how do you intend to FORCE them to sign a new AST?

You can threaten Section 21 or Section 8 if you have Grounds. You can encourage them to sign by ordering something on return (longer fixed term or lower rent).

But you can’t force them to sign against their will.

Leave Comments

In order to post comments you will need to Sign In or Sign Up for a FREE Membership

or

Don't have an account? Sign Up

Landlord Tax Planning Book Now