0:07 AM, 16th February 2024, About 2 years ago 6
Text Size
Categories:
A law firm is warning landlords that they could face difficulties in evicting tenants if they fail to provide Gas Safety certificates before the start of the tenancy.
Nelsons points to a recent County Court case, Byrne v Harwood-Delgado, which could offer more protection to tenants who have been served a Section 21 notice.
According to the law firm, Section 21A of the Housing Act 1988, introduced by the Deregulation Act 2015, requires landlords to comply with certain conditions before they can use a Section 21 – one of these conditions is to give the tenant a Gas Safety certificate, where applicable before the tenancy begins.
Paula Haverkamp, a senior associate and litigation executive at Nelsons, said: “Although, this case is not binding as it is a County Court case, however, it is extremely persuasive and being applied by the courts, it could provide more protection for tenants and improve their ability to be successful in defending Section 21 possession proceedings.
“Tenants may not need this type of protection if the plans to abolish no-fault Section 21 evictions are enforced, however, in the meantime, it’s certainly positive news for tenants as it gives them and their representatives extra defences against Section 21 possession proceedings.”
The firm says that a previous Court of Appeal case, Trecarrell House Limited v Patricia Rouncefield, had ruled that landlords could still issue a valid Section 21 notice if they gave the tenant a Gas Safety certificate before serving the notice, even if they had not done so before the tenancy started.
However, in the Byrne case, the judge, HHJ Bloom, found that the landlord could not use a Section 21 notice at all if they had not given the tenant a Gas Safety certificate before the tenancy began and that this could not be fixed later.
In this case, the landlord had not obtained a Gas Safety certificate at the start of the tenancy but had given one to the tenant after six months.
The judge said that this case was different from Trecarrell House as there had been a clear failure on the landlord’s part.
She also said that the landlord’s failure to provide a Gas Safety certificate before the tenancy could not be remedied by giving one to the tenant after the tenancy had started.
Nelsons is advising landlords to ensure that they comply with all the requirements of Section 21A of the Housing Act 1988, and to seek legal advice if they are unsure of their obligations.
Previous Article
LendInvest unveils enhanced BTL mortgage portalNext Article
Neighbours' anti-social behaviour parking?
Cider Drinker
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments and posts!
Sign Up9:13 AM, 16th February 2024, About 2 years ago
With Section 21 due to be removed from the landlords toolbox, this issue will probably ‘go away’.
In truth, there is no excuse for failing to provide a gas safety certificate at the start of a tenancy.
DPT
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments and posts!
Sign Up12:15 PM, 16th February 2024, About 2 years ago
The RRB proposed that some of the prescribed information requirements be transferred to s8, so I’m not sure this is going away just yet.
Seething Landlord
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments and posts!
Sign Up23:20 PM, 16th February 2024, About 2 years ago
My understanding is that the essential difference between the two cases is that at the start of the tenancy in Trecarrell House a gas certificate existed but had not been given to the tenant whereas in Byrne there was no certificate at the start – that was what could not be rectified by obtaining and serving a certificate later.
Maybe the post says that but it seemed to me that the writer was also suggesting something slightly different i.e that failure to serve a certificate was the problem rather than letting a property before obtaining a certificate.
Giles Peaker
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments and posts!
Sign Up23:39 PM, 16th February 2024, About 2 years ago
For heavens sake, this is nearly two years old! https://nearlylegal.co.uk/2022/06/the-trecarrell-conundrum-revisited/
Jonathan Willis
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments and posts!
Sign Up9:03 AM, 17th February 2024, About 2 years ago
Reply to the comment left by Seething Landlord at 16/02/2024 – 23:20
This is also my understanding. Failure to serve documents can be rectified by serving them. But failure to do the saftey check in the first place cannot be fixed.
There was another case about having to provide all the certificates, and missing one of them caused the s21 to be thrown out. The law isn’t super clear about it which certificates are needed. In many cases a gas saftey check within the last 12 months is usually sufficient
Carchester
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments and posts!
Sign Up10:03 AM, 17th February 2024, About 2 years ago
Reply to the comment left by Giles Peaker at 16/02/2024 – 23:39
Yes, but the legal mafiosa need to perpetuate and regurgitate old news to bolster their income stream.