Landlords: Email or post this letter to your MP about the disastrous Renters’ Rights Bill TODAY!

Landlords: Email or post this letter to your MP about the disastrous Renters’ Rights Bill TODAY!

Knight-themed Landlord Crusader logo symbolizing landlord advocacy
9:06 AM, 16th May 2025, 11 months ago 20

All private landlords know that Labour’s Renters’ Rights Bill will be a nightmare for tenants, and now it’s about to leave the Lords and go back to the Commons for a final vote. It’s not too late to have your voice heard! We MUST work together and ensure that MPs understand the unintended consequences of this poor legislation.

The big issue is that Labour is desperate for a positive headline, and what’s better than dangling ‘tenant protections’ in front of voters?

There’s just one problem: this Bill will hit tenants harder than any landlord ever could. It’s time to grab your pens, fire up your emails and send a letter to your MP – because if this bill passes, the fallout will be on them, and they need to hear it now.

Let’s cut through the spin. The Renters’ Rights Bill sounds noble, but it’s a masterclass in unintended outcomes. There’s so much to criticise (see my previous articles!), but here’s a quick run down on some of the more egregious examples.

Rent control fiasco

By banning offers above advertised rent, it forces landlords to list properties at the maximum market rate. No more holding rents down to secure long-term tenants or avoid voids – Scotland’s rent control fiasco already proved that landlords can, and will, max out rents when squeezed.

Add to that the tax rules blocking small-portfolio landlords from offsetting finance costs against rents, and the crippling costs of upgrading properties to EPC Band C or above (which, without a cap on costs, means spending £20-£50K per property).

The numbers don’t add up, so what do we do? We sell. We exit. And we’re already doing it, despite the Housing Minister’s bizarre claim that there’s ‘no evidence’ of this.

Fewer landlords mean fewer rental homes so tenants will face rocketing rents – don’t be surprised if they end up paying 50% of their wages, not 30%.

Also, be prepared for landlords being reluctant to sign up to the proposed landlord database with lots of personal information that means some tenants can abuse them. It’s no surprise either that there’s no mention of a database for bad tenants.

Periodic tenancy wrecking ball

Plus, MPs need to appreciate that the Bill’s aim of ending six-month Assured Shorthold Tenancies (ASTs) to periodic tenancies is a wrecking ball for the student accommodation sector.

Students typically rent for fixed academic terms, and private landlords rely on these short-term ASTs to align with university calendars, ensuring predictable turnover and income.

Forcing rolling contracts onto the student PRS – where they can leave with minimal notice – will create chaos, leaving landlords exposed to voids mid-year when student demand plummets.

Undoubtedly, many will abandon the student market entirely, slashing rental options for students already struggling with housing shortages.

Also, if fixed-term ASTs remain for purpose-built student accommodation (PBSA), why are private student landlords being saddled with this unworkable periodic tenancy system?

It’s a blatant double standard that will drive up student rents and push more properties to Serco or to private sales.

Labour is being arrogant

Ah, yes, the Serco deal. The government is handing contracts to Serco and others to house asylum seekers, pitting them against tenants for a dwindling supply of private rentals.

With the Bill making it harder to manage HMOs, student lets or private tenancies, many landlords will find Serco’s contracts far more appealing.

Why bother screening tenants or dealing with voids when Serco offers guaranteed income? This isn’t speculation – it’s already happening, and the Bill will turbocharge it. Quality homes will be cherry-picked for asylum seekers, leaving tenants to fight over the scraps.

Labour’s arrogance is staggering. They’ve ignored landlords’ warnings in the Commons and Lords debates, dismissing sensible amendments and are treating us like the enemy.

But we’re not the ones who’ll pay the price.

Small-portfolio landlords, the backbone of the private rental sector, are being squeezed out.

Larger corporate landlords, who can still offset finance costs, will dominate, jacking up rents to boost dividends and profits. That leaves tenants as the real losers, along with students.

Labour is punching down

This isn’t just about the Renters’ Rights Bill. It’s the cumulative punching down of Labour’s policies: tax changes, EPC mandates, Serco contracts and now this new law.

Together, they’re a recipe for a housing crisis. When rents soar and homelessness spikes, Labour will point fingers, but the blame lies with them. They were warned. They didn’t listen.

Landlords, you know the numbers. If the costs don’t add up, you’ll do what any rational businessperson will do: sell, move family in, or pivot to easier options like Serco.

The Renters’ Rights Bill isn’t about protecting tenants – it’s betraying them.

So, act today and write to your MP. Use the letter below to spell out the disaster awaiting tenants if this bill passes.

Make it clear: when tenants are furious at the next election, MPs who vote for this Bill will own the consequences.

Until next time,

The Landlord Crusader

Find your MP’s contact details on the Parliament website.

You can copy the letter below to your MP or download it from the Property118 website – Here is the Word version, and here’s the PDF version. Either print it off and post it or copy and paste as an email.

 

Email subject: Urgent: Please reconsider support for the Renters’ Rights Bill

Dear [MP’s name],

As a private landlord in your constituency, I urge you to reconsider supporting the Renters’ Rights Bill in its upcoming Commons vote. While intended to protect tenants, this Bill will have severe unintended consequences that will harm the very people it claims to help.

The Bill’s ban on accepting offers above advertised rent will force landlords to set rents at maximum market rates, as seen in Scotland’s rent control experiment. This will drive rents higher, not lower. Combined with existing tax policies preventing small-portfolio landlords from offsetting finance costs, and new pressures like costly EPC upgrades, many landlords, including myself, face unsustainable margins. That means we will be forced to sell properties or exit the market entirely.

This exodus is already happening, contrary to the Housing Minister’s claims, reducing the supply of rental homes. The government’s deal with the likes of Serco to house asylum seekers further strains this finite supply, as landlords may find it more viable to rent to Serco than to private tenants.

Tenants will bear the brunt: sky-high rents, fewer homes and increased homelessness. The Renters’ Rights Bill, alongside other policies, creates a punitive environment for renters, not landlords. Larger corporate landlords may weather these changes, but small landlords, who form the backbone of the private rented sector, cannot.

You were warned in the Commons and Lords debates. Voting for this bill risks creating a tenant’s housing crisis for which MPs will be held accountable. Please vote against the Renters’ Rights Bill to protect tenants – your constituents – from its devastating consequences.

Yours sincerely,
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[Your Contact Details]
Landlord in [Constituency Name]


Share This Article

Comments

  • Member Since December 2015 - Comments: 292

    3:28 PM, 16th May 2025, About 11 months ago

    Reply to the comment left by Person Of The People at 16/05/2025 – 14:31
    Yea but it’s not just labour. The cons were on the same page.

  • Member Since September 2018 - Comments: 3508 - Articles: 5

    4:22 PM, 16th May 2025, About 11 months ago

    I’ve just fired off 6 emails to MP’s where I have properties.

    I don’t expect to get a reply as they auto responses state they will only respond to people who live in their constituencies.

    Yet I pay council tax at these properties in void periods so as a local taxpayer I expect to be represented!

  • Member Since March 2023 - Comments: 3

    8:39 AM, 17th May 2025, About 11 months ago

    Good Morning,
    Thank you for taking the initiative. Landlords have to raise their voice as all of our rights have been taken over by this legislation, and in the future, we will suffer. We should act now; tomorrow is too late. We should ask the NRLA and other Landlord Associations to support us in this matter, as no one is representing the landlord’s voice, and we put our hard-earned savings to provide good accommodation to the public.

  • Member Since January 2025 - Comments: 90

    10:26 AM, 17th May 2025, About 11 months ago

    Reply to the comment left by Manoochehr Jafari -Nahad at 17/05/2025 – 08:39
    A commendable sentiment, Manoochehr—but hopelessly naïve. This Labour government doesn’t value personal wealth, aspiration, or reward for hard work. It views success not as something to be celebrated or emulated, but as something to be dismantled and redistributed.

    Their strategy is brutally simple: strip wealth from the productive minority and hand it to the dependent majority in return for votes. It’s not governance—it’s electoral bribery on a national scale. This isn’t new, but we’ve now reached the point where the tipping scale of voter dependency will soon make this model irreversible.

    Ask yourself why over 11,000 of the UK’s wealthiest have already left—this is the largest capital flight in the democratic world, surpassed only by China, a one-party state with twenty times our population. People with means see what’s coming. The question is—why don’t more others?

  • Member Since November 2019 - Comments: 150

    11:06 AM, 17th May 2025, About 11 months ago

    One idea may be to localise it to the post code in their area .
    Log on to EPC Register to show no properties in the area have anything like an EPC. grade C
    This would be any 1930 built semies . and pre 1970.
    Also list the decline in Properties to Rent in their area IE only 5 , 3 Bed semies in x square miles from Right Move .
    I don`t think it will make any difference.

  • Member Since June 2024 - Comments: 7

    2:35 PM, 19th May 2025, About 11 months ago

    Sent the letters off last week, only to get a return email today saying that the MP’s could not consider my letter because ‘there is strict parliamentary protocol in place which restricts members from representing people who live outside their own constituencies’. You can’t make this stuff up, it’s a joke.

  • Member Since August 2022 - Comments: 10

    5:11 PM, 20th May 2025, About 11 months ago

    Cant edit or copy/paste any version of this so not a lot of use!!

  • Member Since September 2018 - Comments: 3508 - Articles: 5

    7:24 PM, 20th May 2025, About 11 months ago

    Reply to the comment left by Leicester Landlord at 19/05/2025 – 14:35
    reply back stating that as a council tax payer in the area (which is within their constituency) you are raising the issues highlighted in your letter because the RRB will have clear implications on the increased costs of temp accommodation that the council will have to pay for from CT receipts ie. Tenants again will bear the brunt of all of this via increased rents, fewer homes and the inevitably of more homelessness (for which the council will owe more a homelessness duty and will have to accommodate)

    Stick it back to them!

  • Member Since May 2022 - Comments: 89

    12:19 PM, 31st May 2025, About 10 months ago

    Well, having used the template provided and also adding some additional concerns I have received a reply from the Labour MP for my constituency.

    It appears to be a typical generic response, drafted by someone in Whitehall, which simply promoted the Government’s erroneous beliefs that all they are doing is for the good of the Private rented sector.

    The focus of the response was, as expected, to support tenants in every way possible, to the detriment of landlords, without realising that such behaviour will impact upon those renting as more landlords say they have had enough and leave the market.

    Nowhere in the response does it offer any benefit to landlords, because it seems to be based on the premise of “not listening” to those who know what is happening, preferring instead to listen to those who only “think they know”.

    The response refers to “unfair rent increases” being imposed by landlords (not appreciating that many costs are created by this Labour Government) whilst conversely, the Government states that under the current plans for reaching net zero, landlords in England and Wales will be allowed to “raise rents” to offset the cost of mandatory energy efficiency improvements needed to achieve an EPC rating of C by 2030. This means they can pass on the costs of upgrades, potentially leading to rent increases of up to £4,000 per year.

    Knowing of this newly elected MP, it is clear that the wording of the response is not hers, but nothing more than yet another example of a Government so out of touch, its decline in popularity is matched only be the potential decline in the number of landlords.

    With reference to the issue of Serco etc, I asked her

    “if you are aware of local landlords evicting tenants who are UK residents, to enable them to use the Labour Government’s financially benefit Serco Scheme, designed to assist illegal immigrants secure homes?

    Was it intended to be at the expense of current tenants?

    If it is at the expense of current tenants, are you still supportive of it please?”

    Apparently, she forgot to answer this very important issue: or perhaps did not want to confirm her position.

    From my point of view, the message is a worthless exercise as this Government (as did the previous) appears set to implement changes to the PRS, whether they are to the unintended detriment of tenants, whilst clearly visibly disadvantageous to landlords.

  • Member Since September 2015 - Comments: 1013

    5:33 PM, 31st May 2025, About 10 months ago

    Reply to the comment left by Ray Guselli at 31/05/2025 – 12:19As far as this Government (and previous Tory Governments) are concerned they both want to eradicate the small private Landlord under the auspices of helping tenants. Any suffering that tenants endure is just collateral damage.

Have Your Say

Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.

Not a member yet? Join In Seconds


Login with

or

Related Articles