4 weeks ago | 10 comments
Two in five landlords are unlikely to continue letting homes following the implementation of the Renters’ Rights Act, according to new data.
Research by property consultancy firm Allsop found that 41% of landlords said they are unlikely or very unlikely to continue letting, rising to 51% among single-property landlords, following the abolition of Section 21.
The findings come as the Renters’ Rights Act came into force on 1 May 2026.
According to the data, nearly a third of landlords (30.3%) said they plan to sell all of the homes they let out, with a further 18% planning to reduce the number of homes in their portfolios (representing a combined 48.4% of landlords who are planning to reduce their exposure to or exit the sector)
More than 70.3% of landlords said they would respond to increased compliance costs by raising rents, while a further 23.2% said they would sell their properties.
Seb Verity, head of research at Allsop, said: “England’s private rental sector isn’t simply shrinking, it’s also consolidating. Smaller, often accidental landlords are exiting while larger, more institutional operators are selectively holding or growing.
“The Renters’ Rights Act looks likely to succeed in its ambitions to professionalise the private rented sector and to drive up standards, which is certainly to be welcomed. Greater security of tenure and clearer redress mechanisms are a good thing.
“But the cumulative weight of regulatory change, layered on top of mortgage rate rises, tax reform and EPC obligations, is testing the resolve of a large cohort of smaller landlords, many of whom provide well-managed, good quality homes for families and many of whom seem no longer to feel they’ll be able to continue doing so.”
“This will increase the cost of renting at a time when simply too few homes are being built to meet our housing needs.”
Mr Verity adds: “The Renters’ Rights Act represents the latest transformation of England’s housing stock. Whether that structural shift ultimately serves tenants well remains an open question.
“Much of what it seeks to do is welcome but, in the absence of a more effective strategy in parallel to increase housing supply and affordability, it may well end up serving only to add to or compound existing housing challenges.”
The data also reveals 44% of landlords with 26 or more properties plan to increase or maintain their investment levels over the coming years, compared to just a quarter (25%) of single-property landlords.
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Previous Article
Landlords sitting on significant idle equity
4 weeks ago | 10 comments
4 weeks ago | 10 comments
4 weeks ago | 1 comments
Sorry. You must be logged in to view this form.
Member Since January 2017 - Comments: 117
10:05 AM, 6th May 2026, About 3 weeks ago
The full impact may not be seen straight away as some landlords will wait for current tenants to leave before putting their properties on the market to sell. (Not wanting to risk letting to the new unknown who doesn’t have a history with them)
Member Since August 2015 - Comments: 29
11:44 AM, 6th May 2026, About 3 weeks ago
My Section 21 was rejected by the Judge last week because the How to Rent Guide had not been served on tenancy renewals with the same tenant but it had been served with the original agreement. The law states you can rectify the situation by serving the Guide late before issuing the Sectrion 21. So we served the Guide on the tenant and then issued the Notice but that was not good enough for the Judge.
Member Since December 2023 - Comments: 1613
2:01 PM, 6th May 2026, About 3 weeks ago
Reply to the comment left by russell branch at 06/05/2026 – 11:44
Were you represented in court or did you do it yourself.
Judges are rarely competent and need form direction from a professional.
Member Since August 2015 - Comments: 29
5:22 AM, 7th May 2026, About 3 weeks ago
Reply to the comment left by russell branch at 06/05/2026 – 11:44
I was represented.
Member Since January 2015 - Comments: 1486 - Articles: 1
12:57 PM, 9th May 2026, About 2 weeks ago
Formal complaint as the black and white government requirement ie the law, was followed.
https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/hm-courts-and-tribunals-service/about/complaints-procedure
If don’t get satisfaction then complaint to then ask your member of Parliament to refer your case to the the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman https://www.ombudsman.org.uk/
Member Since August 2015 - Comments: 29
4:31 AM, 10th May 2026, About 2 weeks ago
Reply to the comment left by Judith Wordsworth at 09/05/2026 – 12:57
Thank you for a useful recommendation. The Judge has asked us to return to Court with proof that the Guides were issued at the renewals which they were not. I will tell the Court that my agent advised that as the Guide had been served at the start of the original tenancy it was not necessary to provide the same at renewals. I will also remind him that prior to issuing the Section 21 a copy of the Guide was provided to the tenant by process server. I acted in good faith and believed that I was following the letter of the law. So we shall see what he has to say.