17:26 PM, 9th December 2020, About 5 years ago 6
Text Size
Categories:
Havering Council has agreed to the extension of its landlord licensing gravy train. The current scheme was launched in March 2018 and has bagged the council the best part of a £million with £417,500 in financial penalty fines, and £350,000 from 314 HMO licences issued to landlords and paid for by increased tenant rents.
Announced by the usual twaddle, the scheme which currently covers 12 wards and will be rolled out to a further six – Cranham, Emerson Park, Hacton, Hylands, St Andrew’s and Upminster. So that should be worth a good extra £half million to the council a tax ultimately paid by the tenants they claim to help.
Councillors have also agreed to the introduction of a new revenue generation aka selective licensing scheme to cover single-family properties in Romford Town and Brooklands wards which will swell the council coffers even further. It will come into force on January 25 and will operate for five years.
A consultation was apparently held in September last year to get views on the extension and selective licensing. Of course the results of his consultation which the council claims “there was support to extend this scheme” are not to be found on the council’s consultation webpage or by a search of their website – even though they promised to make them public. https://consultation.havering.gov.uk/environment/property-licensing/
One imagines that, rather like the plans for the demolition of the Earth in Hitchhikers’ Guide to the Galaxy, they are probably on public display in a locked safe in a locked and guarded basement deep below the town hall.
Justifications set out by the council follow the lines of many past schemes – that is to ensure “safe, quality and well-managed accommodation”, reduce anti-social behaviour in the private rented sector, and giving “support to landlords who meet requirements and already provide good quality accommodation and service.” Little of which happens in practice and strangely no independent research is ever published.
Councillor Viddy Persaud says: “After a consultation last year, there was support to extend this scheme. It means we can further look to help increase protection to tenants, support landlords and further support our aim of tackling poor management, overcrowding and anti-social behaviour.”
Council press release https://www.havering.gov.uk/news/article/867/cabinet_agree_to_landlord_scheme_extension
Phil Turtle M.Sc.
[email protected] | W: www.landlordsdefence.co.uk
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
TrevL
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since September 2020 - Comments: 158
17:46 PM, 9th December 2020, About 5 years ago
If there’s £400,000 worth of fines then there was surely some issues, they can’t all be spureous, no matter how money grabbing the local authority is.
If the landlords that incurred these fines had taken there responsibilies seriously, and fines were low, it would be a lot harder for the council to justify the licensing scheme.
Monty Bodkin
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since June 2014 - Comments: 1549
18:17 PM, 9th December 2020, About 5 years ago
Reply to the comment left by TrevL at 09/12/2020 – 17:46
“they can’t all be spurious”
From the link;
Issued 23 legal notices requiring improvements related to poor conditions
Issued 131 financial penalties for failing to licence
Falco van der Gragt
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since November 2017 - Comments: 8
9:37 AM, 10th December 2020, About 5 years ago
Reply to the comment left by Monty Bodkin at 09/12/2020 – 18:17
Even without these additional money making schemes the councils already had all the same powers. No new powers, other than charging Landlords to register, become available when these schemes are set up.
It is somehow allowed that these councils rip off Landlords and do very little to make conditions better for Tenants.
LaLo
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since October 2019 - Comments: 382
19:09 PM, 10th December 2020, About 5 years ago
I’ve heard landlords are to be ‘burned at the stake’ !
Ian Narbeth
Read Full Bio
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since July 2013 - Comments: 1970 - Articles: 21
11:30 AM, 11th December 2020, About 5 years ago
Reply to the comment left by LaLo at 10/12/2020 – 19:09Hanging’s too good for them said Mr Cruelty. (apologies to John Bunyan)
LaLo
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since October 2019 - Comments: 382
9:41 AM, 12th December 2020, About 5 years ago
I’ve sold up as its not worth the risk – there’s a thumb print on the window which is against reg’s! The tenant is now looking for a vacant park bench but can’t find one!