1 week ago | 4 comments
Rent controls could save the average private tenant in England £2,400 a year, according to a report welcomed by Green Party leader Zack Polanski.
The report, published by the UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose, argues that controlling rents could reduce housing benefit spending while improving affordability for lower-income households.
It was written by Dr Beth Stratford, an honorary research fellow at the institute, and Dr Joe Beswick of the Rosa Luxemburg Foundation.
Researchers calculated that, had rents been frozen in November 2022, the government could have restored housing support to cover the cheapest 30% of local rents and still be spending £2 billion less each year on housing benefit.
Combining the freeze with increased housing support would now be saving the average renting household £2,400 annually, the report claims.
Also, disposable income among renters in the poorest fifth of households would be 22% higher.
Mr Polanski welcomed the findings, saying on social media: “Great to see how well the new report into rent controls has landed!
“It saves renters money and it saves government money.
“And some of that money should be used on building new social housing stock, too!
“Win/win all around!”
He has previously promoted the report by saying it was time to “take back control of rents”.
The Green Party has already called for rent controls as part of its response to the cost-of-living crisis.
During its 2026 local election campaign, it said councils should be given powers to restrict rent increases.
The Wales Green Party proposed a one-year freeze as a longer-term system was developed.
The new analysis also challenges claims that substantial rent reductions would make large numbers of landlords financially unviable.
Using HM Revenue & Customs data, the researchers estimated that a 20% reduction would cut the mean pre-tax profit margin among mortgaged landlords from 70% to 64%.
That margin, they said, would still be 4.5 times the average pre-tax margin recorded by businesses across the economy.
However, the calculation excludes capital gains arising from house price growth.
Unmortgaged landlords, who account for 58% of unincorporated landlords in the report’s analysis, would retain higher margins.
A 10% rent reduction would make an estimated 2.3% of landlords unprofitable.
The authors accept that controls would prompt some landlords to sell, including to councils and housing associations.
Savings generated by a 20% reduction could, within 10 years, support the purchase of at least 48% of the properties made unprofitable by the policy, the report estimates.
Half of those acquired homes could then be converted to social rent.
The proportion that could be purchased would rise to at least 56% with changes to council financing, according to the calculations.
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Previous Article
Survival of the fittest?
1 week ago | 4 comments
2 weeks ago | 17 comments