Tenancy fraud crackdown saves £5m

Tenancy fraud crackdown saves £5m

Model house, padlock with anti-fraud symbol and house keys representing Birmingham City Council’s crackdown on tenancy fraud.
12:01 AM, 3rd August 2026, 3 weeks ago 4

One city council is claiming to have cracked down on tenancy fraud, which recovered 36 homes and stopped fraudulent housing claims to help save taxpayers nearly £5 million.

Birmingham City Council said its tenancy fraud team made the savings during the past year by investigating illegal subletting, false social housing applications and fraudulent Right to Buy claims.

The work also covered tenants who were not living at their registered addresses and people attempting to take over council tenancies unlawfully after a resident had died.

The recovered council homes were re-let to families in need.

Another 210 housing applications were cancelled, while 12 Right to Buy applications were stopped.

Tenancy fraud not tolerated

Coun Baber Baz, the council’s member for housing, said: “Tenancy fraud deprives people of a much-needed home – we will not tolerate it and will use the full extent of the law to root out people abusing the system.

“Demand for housing in Birmingham is at an all-time high, with more than 35,000 people on the housing register in Birmingham waiting for a good and safe home.”

He added: “It is therefore extremely welcome that we are taking action to ensure each council home goes to someone who needs it, while saving a significant amount of taxpayers’ money.

“I also want to thank the honest tenants and residents throughout the city; their tip-offs and reports are invaluable to help us combat tenancy fraud.”

Fraudulent applications

Almost four times as many Right to Buy applications were cancelled compared with the previous year.

Some applications were halted because fraud had been identified.

Others could not proceed because the applicants did not have the necessary funding.

The council said the higher number of cases detected reflected improved intelligence and not that tenancy fraud had become more widespread.

A stronger officer presence on estates, better referrals and closer working between council teams were also credited with helping investigators identify more cases.


Share This Article

Comments

  • Member Since June 2019 - Comments: 932

    3:58 PM, 3rd August 2026, About 3 weeks ago

    Those figures are or course highly biased – why? Those people evicted from illegal sublets are probably now claiming housing benefit.

    This is also true every time a council jobs worth decides a bedroom is too small or that really cheap HMO is substandard – people chose to live there because it was cheap accommodation but the council claims removing the cheap option is a victory.

  • Member Since September 2018 - Comments: 3710 - Articles: 5

    5:01 PM, 3rd August 2026, About 3 weeks ago

    They need to do a check on every single council property. It is rife.
    “The council said the higher number of cases detected reflected improved intelligence and not that tenancy fraud had become more widespread”
    Laughable – illegal subletting is becoming more frequent simply because there is no physical checking at properties, housing demand increasing so there’s more money in it – hence and so more people are doing it.

  • Member Since October 2020 - Comments: 1317

    5:25 PM, 3rd August 2026, About 3 weeks ago

    If Councils were serious about this, they’d be looking for their own housing stock on Openrent, Rightmove and Zoopla maps. I’m aware of several Council tenants that are sub-letting at higher rates in London

  • Member Since October 2024 - Comments: 226

    6:07 PM, 8th August 2026, About 2 weeks ago

    Reply to the comment left by Reluctant Landlord at 03/08/2026 – 17:01
    That’s true. 24 hour notice means they can change the scenario very quickly
    Even private homes rented cheaply to council tenants or housing benefit people can rent it out at a lot higher rent. So spit check should be allowed. This 24 hour notice is a farce as the tenants can refuse a visit from the council or the landlords until it is convenient for them and sub-let tenants.

Have Your Say

Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.

Not a member yet? Join In Seconds


Login with

or

Related Articles