Government urged to expand PRS Database to include rent and eviction data

PRS Database linking landlord rent and eviction data to support tenant rights
8:59 AM, 1st September 2026, 1 week ago 17

The Private Rented Sector (PRS) Database “must not be viewed as an administrative register” but as a tool to empower tenants, a group of organisations has claimed.

In a letter to Housing Minister Matthew Pennycook, the Renters’ Reform Coalition and 30 other organisations have urged the government to expand the PRS Database to include more information, including data on rents charged by landlords.

Under the Renters’ Rights Act, all landlords will need to sign up to the database, which will include information about their properties that tenants can access.

If a landlord lets or advertises a property without first registering it on the database, they could face a civil penalty of up to £7,000. Providing fraudulent information to the database could result in a fine of up to £40,000.

PRS Database risks becoming bureaucratic hoop

In the letter, the organisations claim the PRS Database registration fees cannot be “too small for landlords”.

The letter says: “The PRS Database should not be viewed simply as an administrative register, it will be critical to ensuring the public feels the impact of the Renters’ Rights Act. It is a cornerstone of the government’s ambition to create a fairer private rented sector, by empowering renters, supporting enforcement and improving public understanding of conditions for renters.

“However, if the Database fails to collect the right data, if the registration fees for landlords are too small, or if the database is not in fact publicly accessible, it risks becoming a bureaucratic hoop, rather than the transformative tool renters’ need in order to exercise their new rights”.

As previously reported by Property118, the government says the PRS Database fee will be “fair and proportionate” and has hinted at combining the registration process for the PRS Database and the Ombudsman, but has not confirmed whether landlords will need to pay separate fees for each.

Expand information on PRS Database

According to the government’s Renters’ Rights Act roadmap, the PRS Database will include, at a minimum:

  • landlord contact details, including information covering joint landlords
  • property details, including full address, property type (flat or house), number of bedrooms, number of households or residents, and whether the property is occupied or furnished
  • safety information, including gas, electricity and Energy Performance Certificates, to help ensure tenants are aware of property safety and energy efficiency standards

However, the Renters Reform Coalition urge the government to expand the information included in the PRS Database, including rent data and eviction.

The letter said: “The Database must require landlords to record all evictions and the grounds on which they were carried out, in order to be able enforce the new legislation. This could be streamlined by enabling

landlords to fill out a notice for possession via their account on the Database. Transparency around the use of new possession grounds introduced by the Act will be essential for identifying and preventing breaches of the legislation.

“For example, where a landlord has evicted tenants in order to sell a property, a publicly accessible record of the use of this ground and whether the property is currently occupied may be the only practical way for previous or new tenants to determine whether the landlord has broken the 12-month restriction on letting the property”.

The letter adds:  “Inclusion of rent data in the Database would also provide a significantly more reliable set of data than the market listings currently used by the First-tier Tribunal for rent adjudications. Access to comprehensive data on actual rents is essential following the abolition of rental bidding wars: while this reform is strongly welcomed, there is a risk that some landlords may respond by increasing speculative advertised rents, which in turn could lead to artificial rent inflation if validated by the tribunal.

“Publishing this data would create an invaluable source of information for renters, researchers and the public sector. It would improve understanding of affordability pressures, help identify areas experiencing excessive rent inflation and enable the development of detailed tools and services to support renters”.


Share This Article

Comments

  • Member Since January 2015 - Comments: 1577 - Articles: 1

    7:43 PM, 1st September 2026, About 1 week ago

    It would breach a landlord’s GDPR to put the rent achieved on the current tenancy on a publicly accessible database.

    To note evictions post 1st May 2026 is fine as long as ALL the grounds used are listed. Might also be beneficial to note on the register how many MCOL a landlord has to the Court for – if not just to show prospective tenants a landlord will not be walked over.

  • Member Since October 2017 - Comments: 116

    8:20 PM, 1st September 2026, About 1 week ago

    If the records also gives the tenants’ names this would not be unreasonable (and we could search on that) – this won’t happen.
    I’m sure my tenants would love everyone to know how much rent they are paying. Would they like to know their salary and other outgoings too?
    The part about properties up for sale and empty – how will we ever get empty property insurance with this is place?
    They want a big registration fee – which the tenants end up paying.
    They walk amongst us.

  • Member Since June 2013 - Comments: 693 - Articles: 1

    4:09 AM, 2nd September 2026, About 1 week ago

    Reply to the comment left by Judith Wordsworth at 01/09/2026 – 19:43
    legal pathways are exempt from GDPR.

  • Member Since July 2023 - Comments: 87

    8:00 AM, 2nd September 2026, About 1 week ago

    Wanting a big fee for registration on the database is spiteful and pernicious.

    The ‘bad landlord’ fallacy continues. The truth is there in the last year the amount of disputed bond return was less than the interest the DPS received for holding deposits. Quite remarkable!!

    I agree with another comment ‘They walk amongst us’.

  • Member Since February 2024 - Comments: 92

    1:50 PM, 2nd September 2026, About 1 week ago

    Cybersecurity for this Database…..??

    I recently came across this little piece of factual information…

    ‘A cyberattack on Liechtenstein’s beneficial ownership database exposed data on 31,000 entities, and now Swiss financial intermediaries want their own transparency register postponed.’

    The beneficial ownership database is the equivalent of the UK Companies House listing of directors which has been ‘improved’ by us having to prove our identities online these past few years…..So I am feeling like a ‘sitting duck’, or should I say a ‘s*itting duck’?

    Now, if this, highly secretive database in Lichetnstein has been hacked, and the Swiss are now wondering whether they should go down the same road….

    I want to know how safe the new PRS landlords database is going to be as well as the security around the Companies House data? Anyone on these databases are property owners or company owners/directors!
    What a juicy and potentially lucrative target for the scammers and fraudsters.

    Once again I feel threatened and ‘fearful’ just because I became a landlord who houses people, because councils and governments have neglected their duty of building social housing for decades.

  • Member Since October 2020 - Comments: 1343

    6:01 PM, 2nd September 2026, About 1 week ago

    Reply to the comment left by Cathie at 20:20
    I don’t think it needs to list the tenants names, just the dates the landlord has evicted and ideally the s8 ground they used. Landlords then just ask applicants for details and dates of their previous landlords prior to referencing and cross check it.

  • Member Since May 2016 - Comments: 1585 - Articles: 16

    9:04 PM, 2nd September 2026, About 1 week ago

    Reply to the comment left by Judith Wordsworth at 01/09/2026 – 19:43
    The database ( nor the Renters Rights Act, for that matter ) is intended to be of any help to Landlords !

Have Your Say

Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.

Not a member yet? Join In Seconds


Login with

or

Related Articles