3 weeks ago | 5 comments
The Private Rented Sector (PRS) Database “must not be viewed as an administrative register” but as a tool to empower tenants, a group of organisations has claimed.
In a letter to Housing Minister Matthew Pennycook, the Renters’ Reform Coalition and 30 other organisations have urged the government to expand the PRS Database to include more information, including data on rents charged by landlords.
Under the Renters’ Rights Act, all landlords will need to sign up to the database, which will include information about their properties that tenants can access.
If a landlord lets or advertises a property without first registering it on the database, they could face a civil penalty of up to £7,000. Providing fraudulent information to the database could result in a fine of up to £40,000.
In the letter, the organisations claim the PRS Database registration fees cannot be “too small for landlords”.
The letter says: “The PRS Database should not be viewed simply as an administrative register, it will be critical to ensuring the public feels the impact of the Renters’ Rights Act. It is a cornerstone of the government’s ambition to create a fairer private rented sector, by empowering renters, supporting enforcement and improving public understanding of conditions for renters.
“However, if the Database fails to collect the right data, if the registration fees for landlords are too small, or if the database is not in fact publicly accessible, it risks becoming a bureaucratic hoop, rather than the transformative tool renters’ need in order to exercise their new rights”.
As previously reported by Property118, the government says the PRS Database fee will be “fair and proportionate” and has hinted at combining the registration process for the PRS Database and the Ombudsman, but has not confirmed whether landlords will need to pay separate fees for each.
According to the government’s Renters’ Rights Act roadmap, the PRS Database will include, at a minimum:
However, the Renters Reform Coalition urge the government to expand the information included in the PRS Database, including rent data and eviction.
The letter said: “The Database must require landlords to record all evictions and the grounds on which they were carried out, in order to be able enforce the new legislation. This could be streamlined by enabling
landlords to fill out a notice for possession via their account on the Database. Transparency around the use of new possession grounds introduced by the Act will be essential for identifying and preventing breaches of the legislation.
“For example, where a landlord has evicted tenants in order to sell a property, a publicly accessible record of the use of this ground and whether the property is currently occupied may be the only practical way for previous or new tenants to determine whether the landlord has broken the 12-month restriction on letting the property”.
The letter adds: “Inclusion of rent data in the Database would also provide a significantly more reliable set of data than the market listings currently used by the First-tier Tribunal for rent adjudications. Access to comprehensive data on actual rents is essential following the abolition of rental bidding wars: while this reform is strongly welcomed, there is a risk that some landlords may respond by increasing speculative advertised rents, which in turn could lead to artificial rent inflation if validated by the tribunal.
“Publishing this data would create an invaluable source of information for renters, researchers and the public sector. It would improve understanding of affordability pressures, help identify areas experiencing excessive rent inflation and enable the development of detailed tools and services to support renters”.
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Previous Article
NRLA calls for landlord tax reform to boost the PRSNext Article
Landlord costs surge as income stalls - HMRC
3 weeks ago | 5 comments
1 month ago | 17 comments
1 month ago | 19 comments
Member Since December 2023 - Comments: 1659
8:09 AM, 1st September 2026, About 1 week ago
If applicants provid their last 3 addresses, landlords would be able to see if they have been evicted.
Go for it.
Member Since October 2023 - Comments: 251
10:25 AM, 1st September 2026, About 1 week ago
There has been a PRS database in Northern Ireland for years.
It has zero useful benefit to anyone.
The administration fee seem to be used to pay only for the bureaucracy in the system.
I could be used to advise landlords of upcoming changes to legislation, but they cant be bothered.
So the sum total benefit of registering on the database, is that tenants can see who their landlord is, and where he lives (like we gave them a fake name when they rented)!
Member Since June 2018 - Comments: 21
11:00 AM, 1st September 2026, About 1 week ago
I will absolutely use this to check prospective tenants’ last addresses. It would be an excellent tool to check why they left previous tenancies, and reasons for eviction. Gets my vote.
Good tenants have nothing to fear, so perhaps we should just go all in for a tenants database. .
Member Since May 2016 - Comments: 1585 - Articles: 16
11:17 AM, 1st September 2026, About 1 week ago
Likely Tenant groups asking for merely the number of tenants each “Identifiable” Landlord has evicted, Not, identifying the Rogue, Contract-breaching tenants ( who likely never be able to find another rental property, and thus, rightly, become the state’s responsibility. )
Landlords know full well they are being waged a ‘pseudo’ war upon, with no defences and misleading platitudes about ‘levelling-up’
Member Since October 2020 - Comments: 1343
12:01 PM, 1st September 2026, About 1 week ago
This is not a bad idea, except for the bit about making sure the fee isn’t small. I can see no justification for that. The big concern I have about the database is that landlords will end up paying punitive penalties for forgetting to update the database when something changes. If they can only serve s8 and s13 notices through the database this goes some way toward reducing that risk.
Member Since March 2024 - Comments: 317
2:00 PM, 1st September 2026, About 1 week ago
Watch these hand wringing lefties start screaming from the roof tops if they actually get what they asked for – full details on the register of previous tenants who had to be evicted for rent arrears or anti social behaviour..
Thank goodness this register will be just an administrative excercise for me, if and when my excellent tenants leave all and sundry can look at the register – but nobody will be renting it from me again and not for just this ridiculous twelve months!
Member Since October 2024 - Comments: 228
3:29 PM, 1st September 2026, About 1 week ago
Reply to the comment left by Cider Drinker at 01/09/2026 – 08:09
A lot of tenants get away with giving you the correct previous addresses stating they were at home at the age of 26 to 30.
When you ask where they stayed when at university they are very vague and don’t know is stated.
They are not worth given a property to rent.
Member Since October 2024 - Comments: 228
3:38 PM, 1st September 2026, About 1 week ago
Also the problem is the database will not allow to name the tenants but landlord’s details will be needed. What will ICo say about this? GDPR may say you are volunteering to put your details but we are forced to by the government.
I am not sure landlords will be safe. The government has no concern of landlords safety.
How would this work?
As usual the government do not care. They want mass exodus and reduce or gradually close down the PRS.
However there is shortage of social housing.
Everyone is not happy about social housing or entitled to.
This is a vicious circle which this government are looping it over and over to make it difficult for landlords but more problematic for the tenants in the long run.
Landlords who bought their properties over 15 years ago, have seen good profits can leave if they so wish.
They will still huge profits and CGT once and for all.
There are other investments, some don’t attract any tax.
Member Since July 2023 - Comments: 203
4:13 PM, 1st September 2026, About 1 week ago
Reply to the comment left by Cider Drinker at 01/09/2026 – 08:09
I really don’t think they get it. It WILL become a tenancy database. And the more they press for additional detail the more it will become a useful tool (for LLs and Agents). The main issue is duplication and triplication with Civil penalties for missing any one of them.
Member Since November 2019 - Comments: 199
6:19 PM, 1st September 2026, About 1 week ago
The Government and Councils are determined to Tax, Fine, and regulate the Private Landlord to extinction.