2 years ago | 102 comments
The government has tabled amendments to make it illegal for landlords and letting agents to have blanket bans on renting to people who receive benefits or who have children.
Other amendments include introducing a Decent Homes Standard to the private rented sector.
The amendments will be considered at the Committee stage for the Renters Reform Bill in the House of Commons.
Housing Secretary Michael Gove said: “Everyone deserves a home that is safe, warm and decent. But far too many live in conditions that fall well below what is acceptable.
“As part of our long-term plan for housing, we are improving housing standards across the entire private rented sector, while also ending discrimination against vulnerable people and families who are being unfairly denied access to a home.”
Mr Gove assured landlords they will still be able to carry out reference checks to make sure a tenancy is affordable and have the final say on who they let their property to.
This will apply to England and Wales and will be extended to Scotland via a further amendment at the Report Stage.
Alongside this, a Decent Homes Standard (DHS) will be applied to the private rented sector for the first time.
The new standard will set a clear bar for what tenants should expect from their home ensuring it is safe, warm and decent.
Local Authorities will be given new enforcement powers to require landlords to make properties decent, with fines up to £30,000 or a banning order in the worst cases.
Tenants will also be able to claim up to 24 months rent back through rent repayment orders up from 12 previously.
Councils will also be given stronger powers to investigate landlords who rent substandard homes, providing them with the tools they need to identify and take enforcement action against the criminal minority and help drive them out of the sector.
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
2 years ago | 102 comments
3 years ago | 3 comments
3 years ago | 5 comments
Sorry. You must be logged in to view this form.
Member Since September 2018 - Comments: 3538 - Articles: 5
9:23 AM, 16th November 2023, About 2 years ago
‘unfairly denied access to a home’.
totally irrelevant if they cant afford it.
So another ard hitting ‘ban’ where it it completely meaningless.
Member Since May 2014 - Comments: 620
10:10 AM, 16th November 2023, About 2 years ago
Reply to the comment left by Reluctant Landlord at 16/11/2023 – 09:23
Now they are becoming even more greedy giving Local Authorities more powers to fine us up to £30,000 if the property does not meet decent home standards and the tenant can claim up to 24 months rent money.
What is to prevent a tenant from turning the property into a mould – ridden home or doing something else to the property that will make it sub – standard so they can claim 24 months back rent.
I have an ex – local authority flat and from my experience the council are much worse at dealing with repairs and keeping the standards up.
For example it took them 6 months to fix a downpipe that caused penetrating damp to one of the bedrooms and resulted in having to move my tenants out so that we could take the wall back to the brickwork and tank the whole wall.
This could all have been prevented if the problem was dealt with in a timely manner by the local authority.
The wall was covered with black mould as a result of the local authorities negligence so I wonder who would be responsible for paying the tenants their 24 months back rent under these circumstances?
Member Since May 2014 - Comments: 148
10:15 AM, 16th November 2023, About 2 years ago
Gove is diliberately destroying the PRS to allow the pension companies/banks/LA`s to control this form of tenure. This isnt about protecting tenants, its clearly to destroy landlords ability to invest in property.
Member Since January 2015 - Comments: 1450 - Articles: 1
10:32 AM, 16th November 2023, About 2 years ago
Government shifts away from blanket bans on benefit recipients and families?????
But the government has tabled amendments to make it illegal for landlords and letting agents to have blanket bans on renting to people who receive benefits or who have children.
Member Since May 2022 - Comments: 90
10:33 AM, 16th November 2023, About 2 years ago
Yet, despite the message to Local Authorities from Brandon Lewis, the then Housing Minister, telling Local Authorities not to routinely advise tenants to stay until Bailiffs arrive, where the tenant has received a valid S21 notice, i.e. “a blanket approach”, some (most?) Local Authorities still have this blanket policy approach and ignore the statutory guidance.
The guidance states that housing authorities should not, in every case, insist upon a court order for possession and that no local authority should adopt a blanket policy in this respect…..some (all?) do!
I am afraid it is one rule for them and another for us.
Michael Gove apparently seems oblivious to the problems and needs of landlords, preferring instead to listen to those who think they know what is happening rather than those who actually know.
This Conservative Government has completely lost my faith and support and would not be getting my vote if it were not for the fact that Rayner and mob are even worse.
What a shambles.
Member Since January 2016 - Comments: 50 - Articles: 1
11:01 AM, 16th November 2023, About 2 years ago
Reply to the comment left by Stella at 16/11/2023 – 10:10
What is to stop the tenant doing those things? Nothing – however if you have for eg a window and extractor fan in the bathroom you will have a defence against bathroom being mouldy for (having read the mould guidance released a few months back). And just having a extensive inventory at the beginning of tenancy and a periodic inspection also. So these sort of things would be help a lot in regards to your fears I would suggest.
Member Since May 2014 - Comments: 620
12:05 PM, 16th November 2023, About 2 years ago
Reply to the comment left by Sam B at 16/11/2023 – 11:01
Yes I agree
However if the Local Authority as freeholder are negligent by not maintaining the block (as in my case) and as a direct result have caused the the sub let property to become substandard and the tenants exercise their right to demand 24 months rent, it would be interesting to see how the Local Authority dealt with the problem.
Would there be provisions in the bill to take account of this scenario.
Member Since October 2019 - Comments: 401
1:43 PM, 16th November 2023, About 2 years ago
‘BYE !
Member Since September 2023 - Comments: 173
1:49 PM, 16th November 2023, About 2 years ago
I’d agree that every rent-paying tenant deserves a home that is safe. This must include social housing.
They also deserve a home that is affordable.
If I am forced to install a new kitchen based on age rather than its suitability, rents will rise. Of course, government has a vested interest in demanding things are replaced unnecessarily. The VAT on bathrooms/kitchens and income tax from the tradespeople will be a nice little earner for HM Treasury.
I’m watching the RRB with interest. Section 21 and Section 8 being prepared for April. CGT is minimal for my properties.
It will be a sad day for good tenants that look after their kitchens.
How much should I raise the rent on a 4 bed semi-detached? Currently just £500 per month (s lot less than market rate and a lot less than the LHA which has been frozen at 2020’s value). I’m guessing a new kitchen would be £8k and a new bathroom around £5k. So, the decent homes standard could easily add £50 per month.
Member Since June 2023 - Comments: 6
2:05 PM, 16th November 2023, About 2 years ago
Well I think they need to target BTL lenders as most stipulate no letting to benefit claimants plus the insurance companies who also have it in the small print.