4 months ago | 6 comments
The government claims its reforms will reduce the number of possession cases reaching the courts, despite industry experts warning of an overload in the court system.
In answer to a written question, Baroness Leavitt said that because only cases with clear, well-evidenced grounds will be able to proceed, court demand should fall.
However, as the Renters’ Rights Act has now come into effect, one landlord association warns that time will tell whether the courts can handle an influx in cases.
Under the Act, Section 21 is now abolished, and all landlords will need to use Section 8 grounds for possession.
Conservative Lord Jamieson asked: “Whether the government expect a reduction in the average time it takes for a landlord to regain possession through the courts as a result of the Renters’ Rights Act and if so, when?”
Baroness Leavitt claimed the reforms would help reduce court demand
She said: “The Ministry of Justice publishes quarterly possession statistics which monitor the volume and timeliness of possession claims in the County Court. The Civil Procedure Rules state that possession hearings should be listed between 4 and 8 weeks of a claim being issued.
“The latest possession statistics for October to December 2025, show a mean average of 7.3 weeks from claim to order, down from 8.0 weeks for the same period in 2024.
“In the longer term, we expect the reforms to reduce the volume of possession claims as only those cases where there is a clear, well-evidenced ground for possession will be able to proceed. We are also developing a new digital possession service, doing away with outdated paper processes and reducing the chance of mistakes being made.
“The timeliness of the court possession process is influenced by a number of factors, including user behaviour.”
However, the National Residential Landlords Association (NRLA) has warned time will tell if courts can handle possession cases quickly and fairly.
Ben Beadle, chief executive of the NRLA, said on the NRLA website: “The housing minister, Matthew Pennycook, has stressed more than once that landlords will still be able to regain their properties quickly when necessary and that the courts can cope. Time will tell.
“In the meantime, it is essential we and the government actively monitor implementation and consider litigation and the impact of case law as parts of the Act are tested in court.”
As previously reported by Property118, in a letter to the Justice Select Committee, the NRLA warned that the government has not provided clarity on how the courts will be prepared for the digital possession process.
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
4 months ago | 6 comments
3 months ago | 5 comments
2 weeks ago | 2 comments
Sorry. You must be logged in to view this form.
Member Since July 2013 - Comments: 18
4:13 PM, 8th May 2026, About 5 days ago
On 04.05.26 I Issued a S8 to my tenants, who are 10 months in arrears, with the intention to make a claim for possession once the official four week notice period expires in early June. Of course they are now pursuing a Disrepair claim against me. They pointed out that I hadn’t had an Electrical Installation Check performed. They were correct, I wasn’t aware they became Mandatory in 2021. I mediately instructed an Electrician to perform the check.
I have two questions 1) As the S8 was issued prior to the Electric check do I now have to re-issue the S8 once the Electric check has been done. Any good advice would be appreciated.
2) Under the new Renters Riot Act do I still use Form N5B to claim possession or is it Form N5
Member Since February 2025 - Comments: 74
4:50 PM, 8th May 2026, About 5 days ago
Reply to the comment left by Tom Doolin at 08/05/2026 – 16:13
The rules encourage tenants not to point out that their landlord hasn’t given them the electricity etc paperwork, or that they don’t have a licence when they need one, or that they haven’t protected the rent deposit, so that they can use it as a reason later to resist your claim for vacant possession or to claim back their rent payments. So tenants are deliberately living in “unsafe” conditions. Crazy.
Member Since March 2018 - Comments: 191
7:55 PM, 8th May 2026, About 5 days ago
Reply to the comment left by Jill Church at 08/05/2026 – 14:10
Apparently screen shots of the property listed on Rightmove and Zoopla are encouraged as evidence of commitment to sell, but this ignores the emotional impact on the renter. And if course this assumes the tenant allows photographers in to prepare for those adverts.
Member Since June 2019 - Comments: 803
10:28 AM, 9th May 2026, About 5 days ago
Reply to the comment left by Peter G at 08/05/2026 – 19:55
But you will not want to list a property at the same time as issuing the form, not only are we looking at four months notice but the tenants lifestyle may not reflect your property in the best light and you may not even be able to show prospective buyers round.
This is partly why I was concerned about the implications of evidence required – in reality that section should only apply to arrears and ASB.
Member Since February 2022 - Comments: 72
9:39 PM, 9th May 2026, About 4 days ago
Reply to the comment left by Tom Doolin at 08/05/2026 – 16:13
Not sure how much money they owe, but if you can, issue a separate money claim against. That should be very quick. Get that CCJ against them asap. Do them over….make life really difficult for them.
Member Since September 2018 - Comments: 3571 - Articles: 5
10:00 AM, 11th May 2026, About 3 days ago
Yes because now making every single possession claim go to a hearing will reduce court time obviously.
This government is as thick as mince.