Freeholder has not provided full EC coverage?

Freeholder has not provided full EC coverage?

Pic of landlord insurance document non-resident cover property118
12:06 AM, 24th July 2024, 2 years ago 5

Hi, What right does a landlord have when the freeholder of a block of flats has failed to include ‘accommodation cover if flat becomes uninhabitable’?

I am the long leaseholder of a flat in a block of 37 flats and the freeholder has omitted this coverage.

Do I have any rights to make the freeholder include this cover?

Who can I turn to in order to enforce it?

Thank you,

Jean


Share This Article

Comments

  • Member Since January 2020 - Comments: 559

    9:46 AM, 24th July 2024, About 2 years ago

    First question – what does your lease say? Is the freeholder obliged to provide this cover? If not, it’s down to you.

    On the blocks we manage I don’t believe we ever provide cover to indemnify leasheolders who have let their flats for loss of rent. This is a matter for the leaseholder/landlord to secuer cover for.

  • Member Since July 2013 - Comments: 233

    1:36 PM, 24th July 2024, About 2 years ago

    Reply to the comment left by Graham Bowcock at 24/07/2024 – 09:46
    Is it not usual (Almost universal) for residential buildings insurance to include alternative accommodation for occupiers in this situation? It’s not strictly loss of rent cover although i suppose it could be equated to be.

  • Member Since January 2020 - Comments: 559

    1:40 PM, 24th July 2024, About 2 years ago

    Reply to the comment left by Ray Davison at 24/07/2024 – 13:36
    I don’t disagree with you, but the key will be what his lease requires the freeholder to provide.

  • Member Since January 2023 - Comments: 145

    2:40 PM, 24th July 2024, About 2 years ago

    Insurers such as Zurich include as standard on their blocks of flats cover 20% of the sum insured for AA/LOR (thats alternative accommodation or loss of rent).
    There are lower grade “el cheapo” insurers who dont include this cover as standard.

  • Member Since October 2017 - Comments: 67

    8:38 AM, 27th July 2024, About 2 years ago

    this is a issue The freholder is the policy holder thus does the loss of rent merely mean the loss of his rent which is usually just the fround rent income.

    However on a recent incident with WCC although my flat was not the cause of the water damage I had to male a claim in my name on the policy for damage to my flat -and meet the excess Sedgwicks are refusing to pay my loss of rent The counil said to pusue a liability claim against them ( it was a council occupied flat that caused the escape of water)

Have Your Say

Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.

Not a member yet? Join In Seconds


Login with

or

Related Articles