Latest Comments

Create an Article or Discussion

Emergency supplies including a solar panel, power bank, lanterns and food for HMO tenants during utility disruptions.

What to do in case of disruption to an HMO?

Author: Readers Question

2 comments so far

Judith Wordsworth left the latest comment

Arrows missing a target marked 1.5 million homes, illustrating the government's projected 500,000-home shortfall.

Government set to miss 1.5 million homes target by 500,000

Author: Property118.com Landlord News Team

2 comments so far

Judith Wordsworth left the latest comment

House on stacked inflation and real gain blocks beside a capital gains tax reform notice, highlighting landlords' tax concerns.

NRLA urges capital gains tax reform

Author: Property118.com Landlord News Team

1 comments so far

Judith Wordsworth left the latest comment

Big Ben wrapped in a Union Jack with raised fists and a question mark, symbolising concerns over UK housing policy.

When will H M Government wake up?

Author: Readers Question

3 comments so far

Judith Wordsworth left the latest comment

A person holding a question mark and an EPC graph hanging next to them

What happens to tenants in 2030 if the property is not up to a "c" on the EPC?

Author: Readers Question

16 comments so far

PH left the latest comment

Property keys with a £4,500 price tag outside temporary housing, highlighting asylum accommodation rental payments.

Landlord offered £4,500 for asylum accommodation

Author: Property118.com Landlord News Team

10 comments so far

Lucas Radebee left the latest comment

Child holding a magnifying glass highlighting housing hazards linked to Awaab’s Law compliance

Awaab’s law is not just about damp and mould – Inventory Base

Author: Property118.com Landlord News Team

2 comments so far

DPT left the latest comment

Illustration of Awaab’s Law highlighting stricter housing safety rules for social landlords and rental property standards.

Government expands Awaab’s law for social housing landlords

Author: Property118.com Landlord News Team

2 comments so far

DPT left the latest comment

Two interlocked wedding rings beside a Section 24 cushion, symbolising spouse partnerships and landlord tax planning.

Could a partnership with your spouse soften Section 24?

Author: Mark Alexander

1 comments so far

Ryan Stevens left the latest comment

Golden pound symbol squeezed by rent controls clamp beside LHA coins, illustrating proposals to curb rent rises.

Charity wants rent controls to cut LHA costs and reform landlord taxes

Author: Property118.com Landlord News Team

14 comments so far

Mick Roberts left the latest comment

Landlords queue towards a landlord database and ombudsman, highlighting low awareness of Renters’ Rights Act requirements.

Landlord database awareness trails Renters' Rights Act understanding

Author: Property118.com Landlord News Team

3 comments so far

Jim K left the latest comment

Tightening of Gas Safe requirements?

Author: Readers Question

2 comments so far

Barbara Grimshaw left the latest comment

To Let sign with rising arrow beside For Sale sign illustrating UK rent increases and slowing house price growth.

Rents rise as house price growth slows - ONS

Author: Property118.com Landlord News Team

3 comments so far

Beaver left the latest comment

The government has reassured landlords it will safeguard their privacy in the PRS Database, but has provided no details on how. Property118 contacted the government after concerns were raised by landlords about privacy and how their data will be handled under the PRS Database. Under the PRS Database, landlords will be required to provide information about their properties, including the address, number of residents and bedrooms, as well as copies of gas, electricity and EPC documents. Safeguard the privacy of landlords The government told Property118 that data will be handled in line with data protection legislation, with further details to be announced in due course. A Ministry of Housing spokesperson told us: “The new database will help tenants make vital and informed decisions when entering into a tenancy agreement. “However, we will ensure we safeguard the privacy of landlords, and any data shared will be in line with data protection legislation.” The government adds that under future legislation, landlords will also be required to register any unoccupied properties before marketing them for let. Letting agents and landlords will need to include registration numbers on adverts. Transparency must be balanced with landlords’ privacy The PRS Database will launch regionally, with the first rollout set to begin in the West Midlands in December. Industry bodies have urged the government to clarify what information will be publicly available on the PRS Database ahead of its launch. Propertymark says a redacted version of a landlord’s address should be made available to help protect landlords’ privacy. Timothy Douglas, the head of policy and campaigns at Propertymark, told Property118: “We support the principle of a national PRS Database, but transparency must be balanced with landlords’ privacy and personal safety. “When it comes to databases, Propertymark has previously supported making a redacted version of a landlord’s address available, rather than publishing a full personal address. That distinction remains important as information may need to be held for regulatory and enforcement purposes without being made publicly searchable. “The UK government should therefore clarify exactly what information will be publicly accessible and what safeguards will protect landlords from unnecessary privacy and security risks. Effective enforcement and transparency should not come at the expense of personal safety.” Landlords need urgent clarity The National Residential Landlords Association (NRLA) also echoed Propertymark's stance and urged the government to give more clarity on the information accessible on the database. A spokesperson for the NRLA said: “At the moment it’s unclear exactly what the architecture underpinning the PRS database is set to look like and how the new system will work in practice. “Given that the roll-out of the PRS database is set to start from December, landlords urgently need clarity on these points. “When it comes to data privacy, we believe that all safeguarding processes must be followed rigorously considering the vast quantities of data the new system is likely to possess.” Cost the PRS £327 million a year The NRLA has also warned that England’s planned landlord database could cost the private rented sector at least £327 million a year, with tenants ultimately footing the bill. Landlords will have to pay a £65 annual fee per property to register on the PRS Database. The NRLA spokesperson added: “More broadly, the ‘year one’ cost implications per property for landlords across the sector are likely to be considerable. The position of those landlords already complying with local licensing schemes under the new regime isn’t clear either. “Landlords need to have sufficient time to make the transition to the new system, so the government must take all the steps it can to allay landlords’ concerns.” The database fee will be charged alongside licensing fees in areas where councils operate their own schemes - which can reach as much as £2,300 per property, as charged by Arun District Council. Raise rents to cover cost Landlords are already factoring in the additional costs, with some warning they may need to raise rents to cover them. One landlord has said he will need to charge an extra £6 a month to cover the new database fee. Mick Roberts, one of Nottingham’s largest landlords providing homes to benefit tenants, wrote in an article for Property118 that councils already hold much of the information required for the database through selective licensing schemes. He wrote: “The government has just brought in yet another charge, a £65-a-year fee for each property to be registered on the PRS Database. That means you’ll need a rent increase of around £6 per month just to cover it. “All the information needed for the property database, the council already has for selective licensing. The council already charges around £1,000 every five years for this, which works out at £200 per year, or another £20 per month in rent.” The government has also warned that landlords who let or advertise a property without first registering it on the database could face a civil penalty of up to £7,000. Those who provide fraudulent information to the database could face a fine of up to £40,000. More questions than answers With the first rollout of the PRS Database only weeks away, landlords are being asked to pay for a system while concerns remain over privacy, costs and how the database will work in practice. For now, many questions remain unanswered, and whether the government can deliver greater transparency for tenants while adequately protecting landlords’ privacy remains to be seen.

Government fails to explain how landlord privacy will be protected under PRS Database

Author: Property118.com Landlord News Team

56 comments so far

Mick Roberts left the latest comment