0:04 AM, 6th June 2024, About 2 years ago 4
Text Size
Categories:
London’s housing crisis could be eased by building on vast swathes of unused brownfield land, according to new research.
The analysis by SBA Property Management, found that the capital has enough derelict land to accommodate at least 414,273 new homes.
This brownfield space, defined as previously developed land no longer in use, covers a staggering 3,515 hectares – that’s roughly 25 times the size of Hyde Park.
Despite the potential, only 56% of brownfield sites currently have full planning permission for development so thousands of plots remain idle despite an acute housing shortage.
Habib Mogul, a director at the firm, said: “London’s vast reserves of brownfield space hold the key to alleviating the city’s housing shortages and catalysing local economic growth, while also reducing pressure to build on precious Green Belt land.
“At present, however, thousands of brownfield sites lie empty across London, with development made difficult by complex planning regulations.”
London’s 2021 target of delivering 52,000 new homes annually remains unmet, highlighting the urgency of the situation.
While brownfield development offers a solution, strict planning regulations and high costs continue to hinder progress.
SBA says that Southwark boasts the most significant brownfield potential, with a capacity for at least 54,550 new homes.
However, just 37% of its brownfield sites have full planning permission.
Other boroughs with substantial potential include Brent, Wandsworth, Waltham Forest and Haringey, each capable of accommodating more than 25,000 new homes.
The firm says that developing brownfield sites offers several advantages including having existing infrastructure like transport and amenities.
Also, bringing derelict land back into use will create jobs, help with environmental improvements and boost property values.
However, overcoming challenges like site contamination is crucial and there’s a government fund worth £180 million to help.
SBA also says that relaxed planning rules are needed to encourage brownfield applications in areas struggling to meet housebuilding targets.
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Previous Article
Tenants offered deposit alternative at new BTR sites
Cider Drinker
Read Full Bio
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since December 2023 - Comments: 1539
8:53 AM, 6th June 2024, About 2 years ago
London’s housing crisis will only ever be solved by reducing migration.
Building more homes will soon be swallowed up by allowing millions more migrants to move to Treasury Island over the course of 2 to 3 years. Then, where do we build?
Judith Wordsworth
Read Full Bio
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since January 2015 - Comments: 1389
11:22 AM, 6th June 2024, About 2 years ago
Most derelict brownfield sites have been land banked by developers.
Only option for Local Authorities is to compulsorily purchase, if they have the funds.
northern landlord
Read Full Bio
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since March 2022 - Comments: 353
14:30 PM, 6th June 2024, About 2 years ago
Reply to the comment left by Judith Wordsworth at 06/06/2024 – 11:22Nobody wants to build on brownfield sites, even those rare Councils that actually build houses. Building on brownfield sites is more costly. Sites need to be cleared, old buildings demolished and the ground itself in some cases, especially on old industrial sites, needs to be de-toxified. Anybody who builds prefers a nice greenbelt site close to a main road surrounded by existing infrastructure on which to stick expensive houses. In our area building on greenbelt goes ahead apace while brownfield sites are ignored.
Southern Boyuk
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since August 2023 - Comments: 94
8:36 AM, 7th June 2024, About 2 years ago
And meanwhile OUR £12 b given the Mr K, ruler of all London specifically to build more homes has not built 1 home, where has that money gone?