Appeal Court Rejects HMO Legal Challenge

Appeal Court Rejects HMO Legal Challenge

15:02 PM, 20th December 2011, About 12 years ago 3

Text Size

Local councils have lost their fight in the courts to overturn the government’s house in multiple occupation planning laws.

After a bitter and long-running dispute, the Court of Appeal has rejected their challenge and ruled housing minister Grant Shapps made a considered and fair decision to reverse planning laws rushed in by the outgoing Labour Government in April 2010.

The action was headed by Milton Keynes Council, backed by Oxford City Council and Newcastle City Council.
In April 2010, the then Labour government introduced new HMO planning rules stating that any change from a family home to an HMO required planning permission from the local council.

In October 2010, the incoming Conservative government scrapped the planning requirement, telling councils they already had enough powers to deal with any HMO problems they perceived in their areas.

In April, a judicial review in the High Court rejected claims from lawyers representing Milton Keynes Council that the minister’s actions were unfair because he had not consulted fully with local planners, and the case went to appeal.

In ruling that the government’s recent consultation was reasonable, the judge backed the High Court decision.

Both courts decided that a consultation of local councils in 2009 was enough to let Shapps introduce the HMO regulations.

“In that consultation, over a longer period, Milton Keynes and all local planning authorities were given an opportunity to make representations on a series of options, which included that subsequently adopted by the secretary of state in September 2010,” the Court of Appeal said.

“The secretary of state was minded to make the orders challenged notwithstanding the strong, articulated objections to them by local planning authorities, of which he was aware. The decision to make them was a political decision which the secretary of state was entitled to make.”

Effectively, the ruling leaves HMO planning as is – the default is landlords do not need planning permission when opening a new shared house for three to five unrelated tenants.

If the local council has applied for an Article 4 direction under the Town and Country Planning Act, then planning permission is required.

So far, around 30 council areas out of almost 200 are subject to Article 4 HMO planning restrictions.

Share This Article


terry sullivan

8:57 AM, 22nd December 2011, About 12 years ago

yet again councils pursuing a political agenda with our money--the concillors/employees that did this should all be surchaged

Mary Latham

22:02 PM, 22nd December 2011, About 12 years ago

A victory for common sense.

I just wish that they would apply the same logic to Article 4 Directions. Anything at all that reduces the future supply of HMO's, when the under 35's reduction in LHA is about to hit us, is going to drive people onto the streets.  When the homeless numbers begin to climb, as the surely will, they will do a U-turn but the damage will already have been done.

Moths and lampshades come to mind!

Jonathan Clarke

14:52 PM, 11th September 2012, About 12 years ago

Hooray. And I`m sorry to say it was Milton Keynes Council where i live and invest that brought this action. I will considered moving into this market now especially as Mary says with this soon to be crippling under 35 rule coming into play. The demand will soar for shared accommodation. Some of mine are  ripe for conversion! 

Leave Comments

In order to post comments you will need to Sign In or Sign Up for a FREE Membership


Don't have an account? Sign Up

Landlord Tax Planning Book Now