8 months ago | 5 comments
Angela Rayner claims she has been “exonerated by HMRC of deliberately avoiding tax” and does not need to pay a financial penalty.
However, HMRC have declined to comment on Ms Rayner’s claim, with a spokesperson telling the Telegraph it could not respond due to confidentiality laws.
Ms Rayner resigned as Deputy Prime Minister and Housing Secretary after admitting she failed to pay the correct amount of stamp duty on her flat in Hove.
As previously reported on Property118, the row over Ms Rayner’s stamp duty centred on allegations she “dodged” £40,000 on an £800,000 seaside flat in Hove, East Sussex, by declaring it her primary residence.
According to The Times, Ms Rayner removed her name from the deeds of her Greater Manchester home weeks before purchasing the Hove property, enabling her to pay £30,000 in stamp duty instead of the £70,000 that would have applied if the flat were a second home.
However, Ms Rayner claims HMRC has now cleared her of “any wrongdoing”, and that she has since paid the £40,000 in unpaid stamp duty and will not face a fine.
In a statement on X, Ms Rayner said: “I have been exonerated by HMRC of the accusation that I deliberately sought to avoid tax.
“When purchasing a home of my own with a mortgage, I did not own any other property and had no personal financial interest in the court-instructed trust set up to manage my son’s financial award. I was advised by experts that I should pay stamp duty at the standard rate.
“I set out to pay the correct amount of tax. I took reasonable care and acted in good faith, based on the expert advice I received, and HMRC has accepted this.
“I have always sought to act with integrity, and I believe politicians should be held to high standards – that is why I resigned from government and cooperated fully with HMRC.
“I wanted to ensure that I paid every penny that I owed, and have done so.”
However, HMRC has refused to comment on Ms Rayner’s claim.
A spokesperson told The Telegraph it would not deny that she had been cleared of any deliberate wrongdoing in relation to the stamp duty scandal, but said it could not comment further because of taxpayer confidentiality laws.
In an interview with The Guardian, Angela Rayner admitted some people would still feel uncomfortable about a former housing secretary paying the standard rate of stamp duty when HMRC later ruled she should have paid the higher rate.
She told The Guardian: “I understand that, but this is a very complex area of tax. It’s ambiguous and I did get advice at the time. Therefore, I felt like I’d done everything I could to ensure that I complied.”
The developments come as Ms Rayner is being tipped as a potential future Labour leadership contender, with Keir Starmer facing mounting pressure following Labour’s local election losses last week and growing unrest among Labour MPs.
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Previous Article
Higher landlord taxes mean higher rents - NRLA
8 months ago | 5 comments
8 months ago | 6 comments
2 months ago | 53 comments
Sorry. You must be logged in to view this form.
Member Since February 2025 - Comments: 16
10:08 AM, 14th May 2026, About 38 minutes ago
It’s outrageous that this ex minister should not have penalties put on her for transgressing the law. Any other normal LL would have heavy penalties from HMRC for cheating as Rayner did
Member Since July 2013 - Comments: 309
10:30 AM, 14th May 2026, About 17 minutes ago
What a co-incidence that after all this time the announcement came this week.
Member Since June 2020 - Comments: 40
10:33 AM, 14th May 2026, About 13 minutes ago
One set of laws for LLs and another for government members. It will be a farce if she seeks to run fr PM.
Why should we lose trust in the system!
Member Since June 2023 - Comments: 66
10:35 AM, 14th May 2026, About 12 minutes ago
I may be unique, but I think Angela was treated very harshly by HMRC initially. How many of us would expect to need to consult senior counsel when moving home after having already sold their previous property and had their name removed from the Land Registry. Clearly if she had known of the added SDLT payable she would probably have postponed the purchase until her son was 18+ years old.
Member Since June 2019 - Comments: 804
10:46 AM, 14th May 2026, About 27 seconds ago
There was the additional bit about not living in the house after getting the right to buy discount as well but nobody mentions that now.