8 months ago | 5 comments
Angela Rayner claims she has been “exonerated by HMRC of deliberately avoiding tax” and does not need to pay a financial penalty.
However, HMRC have declined to comment on Ms Rayner’s claim, with a spokesperson telling the Telegraph it could not respond due to confidentiality laws.
Ms Rayner resigned as Deputy Prime Minister and Housing Secretary after admitting she failed to pay the correct amount of stamp duty on her flat in Hove.
As previously reported on Property118, the row over Ms Rayner’s stamp duty centred on allegations she “dodged” £40,000 on an £800,000 seaside flat in Hove, East Sussex, by declaring it her primary residence.
According to The Times, Ms Rayner removed her name from the deeds of her Greater Manchester home weeks before purchasing the Hove property, enabling her to pay £30,000 in stamp duty instead of the £70,000 that would have applied if the flat were a second home.
However, Ms Rayner claims HMRC has now cleared her of “any wrongdoing”, and that she has since paid the £40,000 in unpaid stamp duty and will not face a fine.
In a statement on X, Ms Rayner said: “I have been exonerated by HMRC of the accusation that I deliberately sought to avoid tax.
“When purchasing a home of my own with a mortgage, I did not own any other property and had no personal financial interest in the court-instructed trust set up to manage my son’s financial award. I was advised by experts that I should pay stamp duty at the standard rate.
“I set out to pay the correct amount of tax. I took reasonable care and acted in good faith, based on the expert advice I received, and HMRC has accepted this.
“I have always sought to act with integrity, and I believe politicians should be held to high standards – that is why I resigned from government and cooperated fully with HMRC.
“I wanted to ensure that I paid every penny that I owed, and have done so.”
However, HMRC has refused to comment on Ms Rayner’s claim.
A spokesperson told The Telegraph it would not deny that she had been cleared of any deliberate wrongdoing in relation to the stamp duty scandal, but said it could not comment further because of taxpayer confidentiality laws.
In an interview with The Guardian, Angela Rayner admitted some people would still feel uncomfortable about a former housing secretary paying the standard rate of stamp duty when HMRC later ruled she should have paid the higher rate.
She told The Guardian: “I understand that, but this is a very complex area of tax. It’s ambiguous and I did get advice at the time. Therefore, I felt like I’d done everything I could to ensure that I complied.”
The developments come as Ms Rayner is being tipped as a potential future Labour leadership contender, with Keir Starmer facing mounting pressure following Labour’s local election losses last week and growing unrest among Labour MPs.
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Previous Article
Higher landlord taxes mean higher rents - NRLA
8 months ago | 5 comments
8 months ago | 6 comments
2 months ago | 53 comments
Sorry. You must be logged in to view this form.
Member Since April 2017 - Comments: 166 - Articles: 1
4:18 PM, 14th May 2026, About 21 hours ago
Reply to the comment left by Martin Hicks at 14/05/2026 – 10:35
I have no time for her, and would have taken to the cleaners anybody from the opposite side of the house had they done the same. That said in this particular case in her circumstances I would’ve done the same as her and I wouldn’t have thought I would’ve needed to pay any more than the standard rate. The problem is our tax system is extremely complicated which is one of its huge problems
Member Since January 2015 - Comments: 1467 - Articles: 1
7:30 PM, 14th May 2026, About 18 hours ago
Absolutely disgusting.
One law for Labour MPs and one for everyone else.
Rayner also still needs prosecuting for her s95 Housing Act strict liability offence.
Precedents for ordinary UK citizens?
Member Since January 2015 - Comments: 1467 - Articles: 1
7:34 PM, 14th May 2026, About 18 hours ago
Reply to the comment left by Baker Street Property Meet at 14/05/2026 – 15:46
Has she paid the interest?
Member Since January 2020 - Comments: 135
12:53 PM, 15th May 2026, About 42 minutes ago
Reply to the comment left by Judith Wordsworth at 14/05/2026 – 19:34
There’s been no mention of interest in the reports – only that she has paid the bill and not been fined.
I PRESUME that she will have paid interest, but would like to find out for sure.