Squatters Rights – what’s not changed
In this blog I intend to dispel a few urban myths which appear to be forming, both amongst landlords and squatters themselves judging from some of the readers emails I have received. As of today a person occupying a residential property without the owners permission is committing a criminal offence which is punishable by up to six months in prison and a £5,000 fine and can no longer claim squatters rights.
Yesterday evening I appeared on BBC News 24 and completed a down the line interview with Catherine Brogan representing SQUASH (Squatters Action for Secure Homes) who also appeared on the same 6 minute interview.
Catherine does not match most peoples stereotype of a squatter. I couldn’t see her during the interview and had no prior knowledge of who she was. I watched a recording of the interview later at a friends house and decided to Google her. She is on Facebook, Twitter, You Tube and even has her own blog. Clearly she is also an aspiring poet and to be perfectly honest was quite impressed. Nonetheless, from the interview it was also clear that even for Catherine, some of the lines were still a bit blurred in terms of todays new laws criminalising squatters.
So, let’s dispel a few urban myths and answer a few questions for landlords and squatters:-
- If a person has been subject to a tenancy agreement and fails to pay rent on time or leave the property when a section 21 or section 8 notice is issued this does not make them a squatter and no crime has been committed. This remains a civil offence and a court order is still required for any eviction to be legal.
- The new law does not apply to commercial properties, therefore, the method of removing squatters is the same as it was before the new law.
- Don’t expect the Police to raid and arrest every squatter in a residential building today. It’s not going to happen. The reality is that they will only act once they receive a complaint from the owner. Given that several squatted properties have remained empty for years due to neglect by the owner it is highly unlikely that such owners will even be aware of the new law, let alone make a complaint.
I read a very interesting post written by David Lawrenson on the Inside Housing Blog which suggested that squatters are likely to use the following tactics to avoid prosecution. I thought long and hard about whether to re-publish his words here but I decided to do so on the basis that forewarned is forearmed and the matter should be discussed and ideas shared. David’s comments are in blue:-
“We think all that a squatter now has to do under the new law, is the following….
- Go to the Land Registry website and find out who is the owner of the property. This costs £4 currently per enquiry and takes about 3 minutes to do.
- Make up a plausible looking tenancy agreement with a false name for the tenant and the true name of the landlord. Blank up to date agreements can be found on line in a minute or so, and can be bought for a few pounds.
- Show the agreement to the policeman or bailiff or owner.
- If queried, the squatter will say they pay rent in cash to to the landlord. Naturally there is no trail for cash and they can say that the nasty landlord never issues a receipt.
What can landlords do to protect themselves against this strategy?
I once spent an evening with a landlord who was a previously a squatter in the late 1970’s and early 1980’s. We sat in a hotel bar following a networking meeting swapping stories until the early hours. I was fascinated by his stories of why he became a squatter. He too was a very intelligent man, articulate, well spoken, educated and very much into the psyche of people. He became a squatter to rebel and he beleives that several squatters are of this mindset. He knew he could go home to Mum and Dad at any time but it was the Punk Rock era and “Anarchy rules OK“.
The Short and the Longer Term Solution
A short term solution to the housing problem is for Councils to provide land with planning permission for temporary accommodation. The post war pre-fabs worked, these days pre-fabs are far better. People pay a small fortune to stay in a Winterised Caravan for a coastal holiday these days. I know a park operator who would invest up to £200 million in a Joint Venture with councils to provide such short term accommodation. All he needs is a field with planning permission on a 99 year peppercorn lease from the council and a promise that they will rent the units back from him for 5 years at the same rate as single persons Local Housing allowance rates. He will fund the entire infrastructure, install the units and even contract to cut the council into 25% of the rent after the initial five year term. It seems like a no brainier to me but so far he’s drawn a blank. Crazy really as he knows at least 50 other European park operators who are likely to want to do exactly the same deal.
And the government say they want to solve the housing crisis and work with the private sector – PAH!!!
Anyhow, I’ve gone on for long enough. This blog started out as a professional sharing of information and is turning into a political rent so I’ll stop there and hand over to you.
PRESS INFORMATION
Mark Alexander can be contacted via:-
email: [email protected]
Twitter: @iAmAlandlord
Phone: 01603 428501
Comments
Have Your Say
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Previous Article
New laws scrap 'squatters rights'Next Article
Mary Latham questions landlords rights to reposess
6:52 PM, 3rd September 2012, About 14 years ago
think we have to firstly understand the true definition of ” homeless ”
a chap that has left home, ie; mum and dads house, is not in the true sense of the word ” homeless ” just because he has ‘nowhere else’ to go.
he has somewhere to go. back to mum and dad.
unless of course the individual is recently orphaned and the property was let to mum and dad in which case the lease naturally goes to the successor.
homelessness is, in all reality, a choice.
i was made ‘homeless’ as a result of an acrimonious divorce.
but I was not homeless. I just went back to mum and dad and started all over again. they had to put up with me for 3 months while I got my life together.
the other CHOICE was to sleep rough in the streets.
but it would have been a CHOICE from a number of options available.
if someone chooses to live rough on the streets, we should respect their choice. but we should not be forced to pay for their choice.
Member Since November 2013 - Comments: 40
9:29 PM, 3rd September 2012, About 14 years ago
Cosmo there are those for whom there is no safe parental home to return to.
What is unclear is any legal definition of ‘squatter’. To my knowledge none exists.
Member Since January 2011 - Comments: 12212 - Articles: 1417
12:35 AM, 4th September 2012, About 14 years ago
Hi Rich, a legal definition of a squatter does exist, please see >>>
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/squatter
5:02 AM, 4th September 2012, About 14 years ago
Excellent article. I also read that you could not evict a squatter if they had occupied the house innocently having being duped by a bogus agent. That being the case, they would not need to know the landlords name, or signature. A simple made up AST an untraceable cover story and away you go…
Member Since November 2013 - Comments: 40
3:30 AM, 22nd September 2012, About 14 years ago
Cheers Mark, I’m on a bit of a catch-up mission and I missed this…
A. That is an American website and
B. It is expressing an opinion, that definition has no status in law.
Another bit of useful info I gathered yesterday from my good friend Ken Edmondson is that Trespass remains a civil matter whereas Trespass with the Intention to Occupy Residential Property has become illegal. This is very valuable to me as it means I can continue business as usual on properties advertised as ‘No Access to View’ without committing a criminal act 😉
Good site by the way!
Member Since January 2011 - Comments: 12212 - Articles: 1417
5:36 AM, 22nd September 2012, About 14 years ago
That’s an interesting point on trespass as I heard that the new squatters law had an impact on the right to protest. I’ll get it checked out.
10:57 PM, 5th February 2013, About 13 years ago
In Spain, or in England?