Selective licencing on a BTL residential?

Selective licencing on a BTL residential?

0:03 AM, 14th July 2023, About 10 months ago 17

Text Size

Hello, my property is a BTL residential freehold property. I have been approached by a business owner through an intermediary who is willing to rent the property on an AST.

My property has a selective licence. The business owner will be renting the property but his staff will stay at the property. Am I allowed to let my property to the business owner?

Thank you,

Dave


Share This Article


Comments

Angelin Perry

9:30 AM, 14th July 2023, About 10 months ago

I would've thought not if he's charging the staff rent. It'd be the same as subletting. Ask mortgage company and buildings insurance. Pretty sure not allowed. Not sure how selective licensing comes into it. It could possibly become an HMO depending on what staff he wanted to accommodate there. Too many complications. I wouldn't do it

Crossed_Swords

9:32 AM, 14th July 2023, About 10 months ago

It would not be an AST but a company let - these are not covered by tenancy regulations but have their own set of rules

ROSS SMITH

9:34 AM, 14th July 2023, About 10 months ago

Do a Rent to Rent contract

David Smith

10:06 AM, 14th July 2023, About 10 months ago

Yes you can rent to a company.

Selective Licensing is irrelevant.

I’ve personally let to companies previously.

The Contract will be a Company Contract and not an AST as some. Previously mentioned.

The tenant will be the Company and the person living in the property will be classed as the occupier.

You will be able to take 6 weeks deposit and not the usual 5 on an AST.

You must have a guarantor never let to a company without.

Have a maximum number of occupiers at any one time.

Judith Wordsworth

10:45 AM, 14th July 2023, About 10 months ago

It should be let as a company let ie a commercial contract and not an AST.
You could draft the contract as a full insuring and repairing lease. Just a thought.
This also should take it out of residential selective licensing, I would have thought

Simon F

11:23 AM, 14th July 2023, About 10 months ago

I agree with others -- it would not meet the legal definition of an AST. The contract would be worthless. But that also tells you that the intermediary is incompetent (or worse), so best to steer well clear.

David

15:49 PM, 14th July 2023, About 10 months ago

I would strongly suggest you read more about the potential problems and then turn him down.

Graham Bowcock

17:11 PM, 14th July 2023, About 10 months ago

I agree with others that it's not an AST.

I have done such lets several times over the years without issue. Some responders are perhaps too cynical. However, you do need to have an understanding of the tenant company and how they are to use the property. The best will simply be housing their own staff for no rent; find out exactly what they are proposing.

Get a proper lease done. The tenant can pay for this as (I believe) it's outside the tenant fee ban.

Get the directros to be guarantors. No guarantors, no lease.

If the intermediary is an agent they should (a) be propelry regulated and (b) ought to know what to do.

David Smith

17:23 PM, 14th July 2023, About 10 months ago

The Guarantors would need to pass strict referencing .
Also you could ask for 12 months rent in advance.

N. T

22:09 PM, 14th July 2023, About 10 months ago

Yes, you are allowed to rent, with your own usual checks etc.

1 2

Leave Comments

In order to post comments you will need to Sign In or Sign Up for a FREE Membership

or

Don't have an account? Sign Up

Landlord Tax Planning Book Now