Section 21 evictions rise as homelessness hits record highs

Section 21 evictions rise as homelessness hits record highs

Illustration of houses with the word eviction, symbolising Section 21 rental evictions
12:05 AM, 3rd March 2025, 1 year ago 7

Government statistics reveal a rise in the number of tenants facing Section 21 evictions – though the number of households at risk of homelessness fell by 1.3%.

The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) data reveals that 6,800 households were threatened with homelessness due to a Section 21 eviction notice between July and September last year.

That’s a 0.6% increase from the same quarter in 2023.

The termination of private tenancies remains the leading single cause of homelessness, the department says, accounting for more than a quarter of all cases.

Spiralling homelessness crisis

In response to the government figures, Lord Bird, the founder of Big Issue and a crossbench peer, is urging for the immediate outlawing of Section 21 evictions when the Renters’ Rights Bill becomes law.

Legal experts say that could happen in May or June.

He told the Big Issue: “Section 21s undermine the security of all tenants living in private accommodation – regardless of whether their landlord has any intention of using them.

“Too many tenants hit by these evictions end up homeless, adding to this country’s spiralling homelessness crisis and increasing the pressure on local councils and public finances.”

The director of the Renters’ Reform Coalition, Tom Darling, told the magazine: “Everyone should be able to have peace of mind in their own home, but section 21 powers mean millions of private renters are forced to endure day-to-day insecurity, afraid to even ask their landlord for basic repairs for fear of eviction.

“The statistics released today show the urgency of ending section 21 immediately as it grows as a cause of homelessness.”

Homeless and temporary accommodation figures

The government statistics also show that a record 164,040 children are currently homeless and living in temporary accommodation, a 15% increase – 21,650 more children – from last year.

This is the seventh consecutive record high in two years.

Also, 126,040 households in England are homeless and in temporary accommodation, up 16% in a year and hitting yet another all-time high.

Among them, 24,360 households are living in B&Bs and hostels, reflecting a 17% annual increase.

Build more social housing

The news has prompted Shelter to urge the government to build more social housing to accommodate the homeless.

Its chief executive, Polly Neate, said: “It is unacceptable that homelessness continues to rocket when the government has the power to end it entirely.

“Homelessness has a simple solution – a safe, secure social rent home gives everyone the chance to succeed, but there’s nowhere near enough.

“If the government is serious about tackling the housing emergency, we must see ambitious investment in social housing in June’s Spending Review.

“Investing in 90,000 social rent homes a year for 10 years would give families a fighting chance and end homelessness for good.”


Share This Article

Comments

  • Member Since May 2015 - Comments: 2203 - Articles: 2

    11:22 AM, 3rd March 2025, About 1 year ago

    Lord Bird should live beside an antisocial tenant before he condemns Section 21.

  • Member Since September 2018 - Comments: 3538 - Articles: 5

    1:36 PM, 3rd March 2025, About 1 year ago

    “Homelessness has a simple solution – a safe, secure social rent home gives everyone the chance to succeed, but there’s nowhere near enough.

    Simply reality – they cost too much to build to be able rent at social rent levels and where do you build them.

  • Member Since December 2023 - Comments: 1587

    1:40 PM, 3rd March 2025, About 1 year ago

    MHCLG should be advised that 6,800 households were threatened with homelessness NOT due to a Section 21 eviction notice, as they’d like us to believe.

    The real reason is unfair taxation, unnecessary regulation and the promise of more unnecessary regulation to come.

    Section 21 is a vehicle to effect possession. When it’s gone, Section 8 will be the vehicle of choice.

    I hear another 600 tenants crossed the Channel yesterday.

    Labour had better get building.

  • Member Since July 2013 - Comments: 754

    1:41 PM, 3rd March 2025, About 1 year ago

    Its astonishing that Bird and his fellow cronies can’t join the dots – its this awful legislation and its impact on LLs that’s driving the S21s, not vice versa.

    I used to admire Bird and his efforts for the homeless, but no longer; he’s currently a destructive force.

  • Member Since December 2023 - Comments: 1587

    1:42 PM, 3rd March 2025, About 1 year ago

    Reply to the comment left by Reluctant Landlord at 03/03/2025 – 13:36
    Exactly RL.

    We had lots of council homes in the 60s and 70s. They were too expensive to maintain, with many tenants in massive rent arrears and councils unwilling (or unable) to manage the properties effectively.

    My local Social Housing provider is, so they say, not for profit. My rents are similar to their SH rents yet I get to pay tax on ‘profits’. How does that work then?

  • Member Since March 2025 - Comments: 7

    10:03 AM, 5th March 2025, About 1 year ago

    If a landlord has an exceptional tenant who pays rent, bills and assists with property improvement including cleaning of communal areas, why oh why would he need such a tenant to move on? It does not make sense.

    Although the alternative is not the street corner but better housing elsewhere….

    The renters rights reforms do not look particularly helpful to tenants, even if S21 were not to be used (often instead mistakenly of S8 or S13).

    If, for example, there were to be an issue affecting the rent that the tenant is wholly unaware of? A simple letter outlining an issue from the landlord would clear things up.

  • Member Since July 2013 - Comments: 90

    4:24 PM, 8th March 2025, About 1 year ago

    Reply to the comment left by Cider Drinker at 03/03/2025 – 13:42
    I see what you say about council houses being too expensive to maintain in the 1960s and 1970s. I expect you are right. But where is the evidence please?

    My recollection is the opposite of yours. But maybe I’m wrong.

Have Your Say

Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.

Not a member yet? Join In Seconds


Login with

or

Related Articles