Possession Increasingly Obtained Without Money Orders

Possession Increasingly Obtained Without Money Orders

15:59 PM, 6th December 2011, About 13 years ago 18

Text Size

Landlords across the country appear to be changing tack as the amount of successful possession orders appears to be on the rise.

Let Insurance Services have found the amount of possession orders without a money judgement is up a third on 2010 as landlords appear to be cutting their losses.

“Landlords and agents are facing mounting rent arrears and with no alternative, but to seek a quick resolution in the courts. Tenants have become more savvy with rental law and much more conversant with the legal detail. This trend, combined with the fact that many tenants have fallen on bad times and have no financial resources to clear arrears debt has led many agents and landlords to pursue possession only, foregoing any attempts to secure rent arrears through the courts. Landlords and agents often face better odds securing new tenant rental income than they do securing rent arrears from an existing tenant.” said Michael Portman, Managing Director of Let Insurance Services.

They also expect rent arrears to continue to increase and they themselves have seen a rise in rental arrears notifications, plus a 24% increase in rent guarantee insurance taken out by landlords in the first nine months of this year.

Michael Portman explained why, “We have seen a sharp rise in demand for rent guarantee insurance as landlords and agents look to find ways to protect their rental income. It is clear that this problem is not going to go away. The labour market is starting to feel the strain of public sector job losses and the economy is far from healthy. Ever increasing fuel and food prices could place more tenants in difficulty and the labour market has much ground to make up as the private sector struggles to compensate for public service job losses.

“Against this backdrop, as rents rise over the medium-term, a growing number of tenants will see their finances come under mounting pressure – and we expect tenant arrears cases to climb over the next 12 months.

“The message to landlords and agents is make sure that they consider the strength of the tenant when letting the property by taking out full references and to consider specific insurance through a specialist company for loss of rent if the tenant defaults and the cost of legal expenses to obtain possession.”

Share This Article


Ben Reeve-Lewis

18:09 PM, 6th December 2011, About 13 years ago

Landlords have used S21 proceedings instead of S8 for years, knowig they are throwing good money after bad.

So much so, that it is common practice in homelessness units to presume intentional homelessness where there are rent arrears but the landlord has not claimed them, using S21 on the basis that if not for the arrears the landlrod would have continued the letting.

What is interesting about this article is that fact that it is being acknowledged that rent arrears are on the increase, at the same time as rent being at an all time high. Is this not telling landlords something?

Are these not signs that the market is at breaking point?

If the tenant simply cant afford to pay more rent where does that leave the landlord? especially when mortgage interest rates rise.

Ian Ringrose

13:48 PM, 8th December 2011, About 12 years ago

"What is interesting about this article is that fact that it is being acknowledged that rent arrears are on the increase, at the same time as rent being at an all time high. Is this not telling landlords something?"

It’s telling me, “to store up as match as possible in the good years, to cope with the bad years” as leaving grain in the fields does not stop the bad years coming. A single landlord does not reduce the likelihood of problems by charging below market rent, if anything I would expect more problems.

I also don’t expect any tenant to be willing to pay over the market rent, if the market drops, regardless of paying below the going rent at present.

However If I was a landlord in London, I would be thinking very carefully about selling up (Sorry not what a hosing officer wishes to here).

If only rents in the Midlands were going up as much as London! Cambridge seems to be going up slowly, but with good demand.

Ben Reeve-Lewis

14:45 PM, 8th December 2011, About 12 years ago

Ian I have tweeted someting out this afternoon. An article about how the Midlands is heading for a new housing crisis because of high rents and sale prices.

When I was in Brum the other week I drooled over the low level of rents in estate agents windows but forget that wages are lower so everything is relative really.

I have every sympathy with landlords, even consider myself the landlord's friend in most things but I will never agree on the morality of current rent levels, especially in London. they are blatant profiteering in my book I'm afraid. You may store up while things are good Ian but you are storing up at the expense of others having to turn to pay day loans just to help you store up for the winter

70% of possesion cases are being driven by rent arrears http://www.24dash.com/news/housing/2011-12-08-Over-70-of-tenants-evicted-over-rent-arrears-in-private-sector-research

It also doesnt make business sense to kill the goose that lays the golden egg.

The Bank of England have already warned of mortgage rate interest rises in the new year. If tenants are so maxed out on paying thier rents that arrears are increasing and people are turning to pay day loans just to stay in their homes, how are landlrods going to raise rent to meet interest rates when people already cant cope?

This week I have interviewed 2 landlords who are in mortgage arrears and threatened with repossession because their tenants are behind on the rent. The market can only bear so much and it is the tenant's who are supporting the market whilst slowly going into financial meltdown, while landlords store up for the winter.

Taking a holistic view, which I believe I am one of the few around who is, it doesnt make business sense to set rents so high that people cant afford them. there will be a backlash. I dont know if anyone is monitoring figures but I wonder, in this current climate of grim austerity, if rent arrears will rise over the Xmas period with people saying 'Sod it, enough is enough. My kids come first f***k the landlord's profits'. Which is what I am hearing in interview rooms lately.

I agree with Shelter on many of their campaigns apart from their rogue landlord one, which I think is over-simplistic and misplaced and I agree with landlords in much of what they are trying to achieve but not on the subject of rent levels. Not just on moral grounds but on business ones too. It makes no sense to set something up for a short term gain that could destroy you long term.

I stand back, naked in the light of these comments on P118 and await the kicking haha

Ian Ringrose

15:11 PM, 8th December 2011, About 12 years ago

"It also doesnt make business sense to kill the goose that lays the golden egg. "

The problem is that a single landlord can't stop other landlords killing the goose. Anyway I would not call about 4% yield after charges/voids etc. a "golden egg" - that is about what we get, but we are renting out nice homes we brought to live in - rather than low end BLT props.

Ben Reeve-Lewis

15:23 PM, 8th December 2011, About 12 years ago

BLT???? Bacon Lettuce and Tomato?

Ian Ringrose

15:37 PM, 8th December 2011, About 12 years ago

Sorry I meant BTL, now how do I edit a post?

Ben Reeve-Lewis

15:41 PM, 8th December 2011, About 12 years ago

Seriously though Ian. I dont expect a single landlord to stop other landlords killing the goose. It is simply a matter of not killing your own goose when things go belly up for your properties and tenants.

I know several landlords whose rents are kept well below current market level for exactly that reason, they realise that thier finances are inextricably entwined with those of their tenants, who are their source of income - taking the long term view with reliable tenants who can afford to live in the homes they provide. This landlords will survive.

Also I dont think for a minute that BTL properties are necessarily low end, nor that landlords rent out homes they originally bought to live in. I appreciate that this may be how you got into the business but it isnt across the board.

I regularly read on this site of landlords saying how hard it is to find good tenants and persuade them to stay on long term, if that is the case then surely it makes sense to help keep them there.

I would love to carry on living in my place at the end of my agreement in March but I am sure my landlord will simply jack the rent up another £200 a month (which happened to the flat above mine 2 months ago) and me and Frazzy will be forced into a 3rd expensive move in 18 months. If even 2 decent wage earning middle aged professionals cant afford to even pay rent where does that leave so many others?

Mark Alexander - Founder of Property118

15:41 PM, 8th December 2011, About 12 years ago

Sorry Ian, you can't, but it was quite funny from this side of the screen 😉 Coffee spray now removed from mine thanks to Mary's cleaning tips

Mark Alexander - Founder of Property118

15:57 PM, 8th December 2011, About 12 years ago

Hi Ben

I do feel for everybody in the same position as you and Frazzy but the issue goes back to the most basic laws of economics "scarcity" better known as supply and demand. Economics is a social science at best, it's very much like nature, it sorts itself out in the end. I remember when I was a kid and one summer there was a plague of ladybirds, walls were covered in them an inch thick, but the balance was soon restored. It's anybody's guess as to what will happen to the London property market for it to level out but right now it's foreign buyers that are inflating the market and creating the scarcity issues, not buy to let landlords. Across the UK there is a lot less new BTL business occuring than there was 3 or 4 years ago, about 75% less in fact. There is also a lot less property being built. Are those two things coincidental? Only when supply of property is increased beyond the point of demand will rents fall. What are the short term prospects of that though? none I'd suggest.

The trouble is, there are not enough properties being built because so few would be homeowners and BTL investors can raise the finance to buy them at a price that justifies them being built. That seems like a stalemate but I suspect it isn't. With the advancements of technology combined with the issues surrounding affordability it may well be that the London property market finds its level as a result of more people moving further out of the city, thus causing the ripple effects across the UK which you so often see me write about.

Ben Reeve-Lewis

16:14 PM, 8th December 2011, About 12 years ago

I dont disagree with your analysis Mark but one thing that I think should be significantly different with market forces determining rent is that people's homes arent turnips, or maybe, less facetiously, not charter flights.

If cheap flight prices rise as a result of market forces pushing up airport costs and fuel, people just cut back on holidays. Annoying but no more than that, whereas if market forces push rents beyond the levels people can afford people end up homeless or being driven from the areas where they grew up and where their family, freinds and work is and I dont think that is acceptable.

Communities thrive by being just that, communities. but if people are forced to move because of high rents, and the insecurity of assured shorthold tenancies communites get destroyed and nobody cares about anyone else, thats how riots happen, through people not caring about the area they live in because they have no vested interests in it.

I totally agree about foreign investors affecting the market. My landlords are a couple of non resident Greek brothers, thats why I know they will jack the rent up, based on the info on rent levels that their London based national agents will tell them is achievable and on a daily basis I am seeing a massive rise in clients coming in to see me whose landlrods are Chinese, whereas from 1990 to 2001 I think I only ever saw 1 Chinese landlord.

I read last week of some mortgage companies coming up with deals to make it easier for first time buyers to get in which, the article warned, if succesful could take the presure off the PRS and drive rents down. Obviously as a tenant I would wlecome that but as a housing profesional it is not lost on me what will happen to PRS landlords who have to lower rents if, as Ian suggests about they are only making 4% on top of everything else. We cant afford for PRS landlords to drop in number.

The whole system seems cockeyed to me, just permanently in boom and bust, either tenants suffer because rents are ridiculous or landlords suffer when the market forces their margins down. There has to be a more sustainable way of working than this

1 2

Leave Comments

In order to post comments you will need to Sign In or Sign Up for a FREE Membership


Don't have an account? Sign Up

Landlord Tax Planning Book Now