9:08 AM, 29th August 2018, About 3 years ago 15
Hope I can get some advice, which is always appreciated from the 118 community
Briefly, our freeholder took us to First Tier Tribunal in July over numerous issues and lost on all counts.
The main issue was service charges. He charged us in advance, does NOT issue any service demands which do not comply with s21b(1) landlord and tenant act 1985, don’t contain statements of our rights etc.
“under this demand, the landlord is unable to recover due service charges until he complies with the act and process. This he has now done, however, the tribunal also stated “the tribunal was only asked to consider the service charges for 2017/18, but the principles will be relevant to the subsequent years. THE PARTIES MAY NEED TO CONSIDER WHETHER THOSE PRINCIPLES HAVE APPLICATION TO CHARGES DEMANDED IN PREVIOUS YEARS”
So, my question is simple, I guess the tribunal is saying that maybe we are also not liable for the previous3 years of service charges, does anyone else come to this conclusion or whats implied and does anyone have an opinion?
He took us to court on 5 issues and lost all 5 issues, ranging from him supplying fake quotes for works submitted and charging is 000’s, to demanding a service charge each year and wanting a kitty which is not allowed in our lease for this provision, to charging us for work he cant prove he paid, to charging service charges and splitting the % as he deems fit, not as a set % based on xyz formula (the tribunal also said this was not fair and was not legal)
Rambled on a bit but tempted to inform him that he did not comply with the process of how demands should be met and we are due to a refund and if he’s unhappy we can always go back once again to tribunal. Its many 000’s of £, so it’s not a few hundred quid!
Please Log-In OR Become a member to reply to comments or subscribe to new comment notifications.
Advice and implementation provided by a practising Barrister-At-Law with £10,000,000 of Professional Indemnity InsuranceBook Now
Previous ArticleShelter shocked at result of 10%, no make that 4.7% or maybe zero
|“Account”||means an account required to access and/or use certain areas and features of Our Site;|
|“Cookie”||means a small text file placed on your computer or device by Our Site when you visit certain parts of Our Site and/or when you use certain features of Our Site. Details of the Cookies used by Our Site are set out in section 13, below;|
|“Cookie Law”||means the relevant parts of the Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive) Regulations 2003;|
|“personal data”||means any and all data that relates to an identifiable person who can be directly or indirectly identified from that data. In this case, it means personal data that you give to Us via Our Site. This definition shall, where applicable, incorporate the definitions provided in the EU Regulation 2016/679 – the General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”); and|
|“We/Us/Our”||Means Property118 Ltd , a limited company registered in England under company number 10295964, whose registered address is 1st Floor, Woburn House, 84 St Benedicts Street, Norwich, NR2 4AB.|
|Name of Cookie||Purpose||Strictly Necessary|
|JSESSIONID||Used only to collect performance data, with any identifiable data obfuscated||No|
|__cfduid||This cookie is strictly necessary for Cloudflare's security features and cannot be turned off.||Yes|
|Name of Cookie||First / Third Party||Provider||Purpose|
|__utma, __utmb, __utmc, __utmt, __utmz||First||Helps to understand how their visitors engage with our website|
|_fbp||First||Helps to understand how their visitors engage with our website|