NRLA says the Renters (Reform) Bill ‘delivers a fair deal for tenants and responsible landlords’

NRLA says the Renters (Reform) Bill ‘delivers a fair deal for tenants and responsible landlords’

9:52 AM, 24th April 2024, About 2 weeks ago 52

Text Size

As the Renters (Reform) Bill heads back to Parliament, the proposals have led to criticism from both renter campaign groups and the National Residential Landlords Association (NRLA).

MPs will debate the Bill today with 122 pages of nearly 200 amendments to debate and agree on.

But while the NRLA says the Bill is a fair compromise, with the abolition of Section 21 ‘no-fault’ evictions and new protections for tenants, like a Decent Homes Standard and a property portal.

Landlords would also be banned from discriminating against families or benefit recipients.

That’s not the view of the Renters’ Reform Coalition and Generation Rent – who say the Bill ‘will be a failure’ because the government has made too many concessions to backbench MPs.

‘Bill delivers a fair deal for tenants and responsible landlords’

The NRLA’s chief executive, Ben Beadle, said: “This Bill delivers a fair deal for tenants and responsible landlords. In the interests of certainty for the sector it is now time to ensure the Bill passes through Parliament.

“For renters, the Bill will abolish section 21 repossessions and fixed term tenancies, introduce a Decent Homes Standard for the sector, a new Ombudsman and Property Portal which landlords will have to join as well as measures to protect families and those in receipt of benefits from discrimination.

“Going forward, it will always be for the courts to decide if landlords have met the threshold to repossess a property based on a series of legitimate reasons.

“This includes tenant anti-social behaviour, serious rent arrears or where a landlord plans to sell a property.”

He adds: “A number of the amendments proposed to the Bill enact recommendations by the cross-party housing select committee.

“Taken together they would ensure a balanced Bill that protects tenants and ensures it is viable for responsible landlords to continuing renting properties out.”

The Bill ‘will be a failure’

The Renters’ Reform Coalition says that the Bill ‘will be a failure’ in its current form.

The group says that the Bill would need major changes to meet its aims of achieving a ‘better deal for renters’.

A spokesperson said: “We have been clear from the outset that the Renters (Reform) Bill would have no chance of achieving these aims without significant changes.

“Unfortunately, as groups representing and working alongside private tenants in England, our concerns have not been taken seriously.

“It is revealing that ministers have met with lobbyists for landlords and estate agents twice as often as they have met groups representing renters.”

‘A bill that abolishes section 21 in name only’

They added: “The result of all the government’s backtracking is that we have now have a bill that abolishes section 21 in name only – there is no guarantee it would ever fully abolish section 21, and even then, the new tenancy system set to replace it will be little better.

“This legislation is intended to give the impression of improving conditions for renters, but in fact it preserves the central power imbalance at the root of why renting in England is in crisis.”

The group says that tenants face insecurity with more than a quarter living in three or more private rented homes in the previous five years.

They also claim that poor conditions ‘are rife’ and that 22% of privately renting households don’t make complaints because they fear eviction.

There are also worries over affordability and ‘record numbers’ are being made homeless.

All concessions made to backbench MPs to be reversed

The coalition says it wants all concessions made to backbench MPs to be reversed, tenants to get four months’ instead of two, not ‘trapping’ tenants into six month tenancies.

They also don’t want the selective licensing burden on landlords to be reviewed and protecting tenant evictions in the first two years of a tenancy.

And give the courts discretion over whether an eviction should take place.

They also want rent rises restricted so there are no Section 21 ‘economic’ evictions, so the rise is not unaffordable to the tenant.

‘Government committed to end section 21’

Ben Twomey, the chief executive of Generation Rent, said: “Everyone deserves to feel secure in their own home, which is why the government committed to end section 21 ‘no-fault’ evictions over five years ago.

“The Renters (Reform) Bill does not deliver the original promise that landlords will ‘no longer be able to unexpectedly evict families with only 8 weeks’ notice’.

“Renters were promised once-in-a-generation change but if this Bill passes in its current form, we could still be just a couple of months away from homelessness, even if we play by all the rules set by landlords.”

He added: “That’s why as a bare minimum we’re calling on the government to double eviction notice periods to four months, while increasing the time tenants can spend in their home without fear of eviction from six months to two years.”


Share This Article


Comments

Fed Up Landlord

7:08 AM, 25th April 2024, About 2 weeks ago

NRLA subscription cancelled due to the music emanating from the new pop group "Barmy Ben Beadle and his Tenant Loving Trio"

Ben Loony Twoomey lead guitar, Polly Bleat on drums and Dan Wilson Stick In Your Craw on keyboards. Barmy Bens on vocals. Too vocal for his own good.

PH

7:51 AM, 25th April 2024, About 2 weeks ago

Reply to the comment left by Stella at 24/04/2024 - 23:24
No judge will tell me if I can sell or not as I'll be out before then. Who do these people think they are !

Retired GasMan

8:01 AM, 25th April 2024, About 2 weeks ago

We saw a similar stance with the CEO of ARLA, when they were changing the legislation about tenant fees and requirement to register with a body.

So whilst you may think the NRLA will lose members, watch this space, Ben Beadle has a job to do and it will be interesting to see how this pans out.

For clarity, as a professional and ethical landlord I am dead against the proposals, yet again we are getting penalised for the slumlords, and political posturing of course.

Cider Drinker

8:44 AM, 25th April 2024, About 2 weeks ago

NRLA will be pinning their hopes on more selling more memberships and more ‘build once sell many times’ courses if accreditation becomes mandatory.

In truth, I’d expect fewer members as landlords choose to sell.

Cider Drinker

8:58 AM, 25th April 2024, About 2 weeks ago

According to the 2021 census,

62.5% of us own our homes either outright or with a mortgage.

20.3% were in privately rented accommodation

17.1% were in social housing accommodation.

That 20.3% (in the PRS) represents 5 million people.

It is reported that landlords are selling up in large numbers and others are switching to holiday lets.

We know that social housing cannot accommodate a significant number of these 5 million people because there are not sufficient SH properties.

By the time of the next census (2031), the population will have increased by another 3 million people.

The numbers are scary.

My instinct tells me to hold on to my properties because their value is far greater than the money that they are worth. My heart tells me to get rid and retire but maybe keep one as a holiday let.

Reluctant Landlord

9:49 AM, 25th April 2024, About 2 weeks ago

Reply to the comment left by Cider Drinker at 25/04/2024 - 08:58while yes it is clear accommodation is needed now more than ever and its ALWAYS going to be needed going forward, while it makes total sense to hold onto properties, the key issue is what you do with them while you hold them.
The current government (and next one?), seem hell bent on ensuring that anyone you rent to stays there indefinitely (because they don't want to deal with any more being unhoused) and also that short term lets are minimised. (they idea being to try push them back into longer rentals)
That leaves you with either letting to a long term tenant and literally hoping all goes well, using a R2R provider and just handing it over, converting into an HMO if you are able (save all the planning, costs and hassle that brings), sticking with holiday lets/going into holiday lets where clearly more legislation/tax is inevitable, or leaving the property empty wherein there's an increasing CT charge creeping up to 400% or just selling lock stock and barrel???

Sally Robinson

12:45 PM, 26th April 2024, About 2 weeks ago

Now I know for certain why I will NEVER join the NRLA, Cearly someone wants an honours list gong at our expense!!

Whiteskifreak Surrey

7:26 AM, 27th April 2024, About 2 weeks ago

BB's actions are highly praised on Linkedin, by some well known (and lass well known) property people.
I wonder why?

David100

9:21 AM, 27th April 2024, About 2 weeks ago

Headline says it all, only landlords have to be "responsible" As for Tenants............not so much. I wont be buying anymore property to rent in the UK, from now on I will be buying overseas. Politicians here are only interested in pandering, not improving.

GlanACC

9:35 AM, 27th April 2024, About 2 weeks ago

The NRLA had a turnover of £9m last year, so extropolating they probably represent around 100,000 landlords. Which is nowhere near the estimated 2.8 million private landlords and 300,000 private LTD companies. The NRLA is basically a money making machine now. Having said that they are probably the nearest thing to a landlord organisation. I wonder how much the beagle gets paid.

Leave Comments

In order to post comments you will need to Sign In or Sign Up for a FREE Membership

or

Don't have an account? Sign Up

Landlord Tax Planning Book Now