6 days ago | 36 comments
The government has confirmed that landlords’ information submitted to the PRS Database will not be publicly available before 2027.
In answer to a written parliamentary question, housing minister Matthew Pennycook claims information on the PRS Database will be proportionate for landlords.
The news comes as the government has published guidance setting out how landlords must register with the PRS Database.
In a written question, Conservative MP Mark Garnier asked: “Whether the government plans to make the residential addresses of landlords not publicly accessible on the PRS Database”.
In response, Mr Pennycook said: “Information submitted to the ‘Register your rental property’ service will not be publicly visible before winter 2027.
“Future legislation will set out which landlord and property records will be publicly accessible at the point the public-facing service is launched at a later date.
“Following this, tenants will be able to access certain necessary and proportionate information about landlords and rental properties, to help them better understand whether key legal requirements are being met.
“In considering which information should be published, the government will carefully balance the benefits of transparency with landlords’ privacy rights, safety concerns, and data protection requirements.”
As previously reported by Property118, MPs have raised concerns over landlords’ privacy rights in relation to the PRS Database, with Conservative housing spokesman Gareth Bacon questioning how landlords would be able to check records across their portfolios and establish what had been changed.
He said: “Then there is the lack of an audit trail.
“Because of the system favoured by the government, landlords have no ability to verify and validate data on a portfolio basis.”
He added: “They have no access controls nor an audit trail for data uploads, changes or deletions.”
Mr Bacon warned that these alleged shortcomings could lead to administrative errors, potential fines and wider compliance risks.
In his response, Mr Pennycook did not directly address the concerns over the lack of an audit trail, although he outlined plans for organisations to add employees to their accounts and the possibility of linking the database with property management systems.
The latest guidance confirms that organisation team members will be able to register and update properties. However, it remains unclear whether landlords will have access to a record of changes showing who amended, uploaded or deleted information.
35 comments on this article
A different perspective could help you spot an issue, avoid a mistake or find a better way forward. Read the comments and add your own views if you wish.
Previous Article
Landlord confidence falls despite rising profitability
6 days ago | 36 comments
2 weeks ago | 41 comments
3 weeks ago | 16 comments
Member Since October 2011 - Comments: 156
11:29 AM, 5th November 2026, About 3 days ago
Reply to the comment left by DP at 05/11/2026 – 11:22
what would happen if we ALL said no?
Member Since February 2024 - Comments: 114
11:38 AM, 5th November 2026, About 3 days ago
Reply to the comment left by DP at 05/11/2026 – 11:22
perhaps some of us won’t
Member Since January 2023 - Comments: 357
11:40 AM, 5th November 2026, About 3 days ago
Reply to the comment left by Sally Robinson at 05/11/2026 – 11:38
Perhap some of the 2million LLs wont even know they need to fill in database.
Member Since April 2018 - Comments: 703
11:56 AM, 5th November 2026, About 3 days ago
Reply to the comment left by Crouchender at 05/11/2026 – 11:40
How many don’t even know it exists like MTD, until they get the fines.
Member Since April 2020 - Comments: 135
12:18 PM, 5th November 2026, About 3 days ago
I think we need to consult a lawyer regarding GDPR concerning privacy and what is not permissible and what we can do, can we ask Property 118 team if they know anyone who can advise even of a general nature regarding this and then decide what to do because this cannot be right ??
Member Since November 2017 - Comments: 275
1:09 PM, 5th November 2026, About 3 days ago
Reply to the comment left by DP at 05/11/2026 – 12:18
Excellent idea, only it may be more effective if was run via one of the larger landlord groups? To be honest I’m surprised a legal challenge hasn’t already occurred.
Member Since April 2020 - Comments: 135
1:17 PM, 5th November 2026, About 3 days ago
Reply to the comment left by Tim Rogers at 05/11/2026 – 13:09
Landlord Action might be able to offer some advice?
Member Since January 2015 - Comments: 1656 - Articles: 1
7:49 AM, 7th November 2026, About 1 day ago
Reply to the comment left by Imout Ofhere at 04/11/2026 – 16:27
I am surprised that the database isn’t publicly displaying the religion of the landlord- yet.
Member Since January 2015 - Comments: 1656 - Articles: 1
7:53 AM, 7th November 2026, About 1 day ago
Reply to the comment left by Denise G at 05/11/2026 – 11:29
Could not be published as nothing to publish
Chaos for the government.
Could also bring the court system down.
Member Since January 2015 - Comments: 1656 - Articles: 1
7:57 AM, 7th November 2026, About 1 day ago
Reply to the comment left by Sally Robinson at 05/11/2026 – 11:38
Some isn’t enough. No PRS landlord should.
Should all have served a s21 in 2018 when the Renters Reform Bill rose it’s head. Would have stopped this nonsensical legislation. Some of us did, and are now out. Some did later when the Renters Rights Act rose it’s head and now some are serving s8.
If landlords now served s8 tenants would likely be standing with landlords.