Profile incomplete
0:01 AM, 9th February 2024, About 3 months ago 5
Text Size
A landlord has expressed his worries about the possible problems that tenants could cause for him and other landlords with properties in selective licensing areas, due to councils delaying renewing their licenses.
The landlord, who wished to remain anonymous, owns an HMO (house in multiple occupation) in a London borough that requires a license to operate.
He applied for a renewal of his five-year license a year ago, but the council has not issued him a new one yet.
He told Property118: “I supplied all the necessary information and paid the fees. Since that moment, the council concerned still has not provided the new license stating that they ‘have a backlog’ and not enough people and resources to renew the license.”
He added that he has contacted the council several times, but he always gets the same response.
He now fears that a tenant might notice the expired license and create issues for him, such as withholding rent or demanding compensation.
The landlord said: “I am concerned that there will be a bad tenant who at some point will see the license – now expired – and make issues.
“I am taken aback because whatever I as a landlord need to supply to the council – they as standard state ‘within five business days otherwise a fine of £30,000 will be levied’ which I find disproportionately heavy-handed and quite impolite and unprofessional.”
He also wonders what his legal position is in this situation.
He said: “I have kept email records and have chased the council regularly every couple of months.”
According to the government website, landlords who operate an HMO or a property in a selective licensing area must have a valid license from the local council.
Failing to do so can result in prosecution and unlimited fines.
The website also states that landlords who have applied for a license and are waiting for the council’s decision are allowed to continue to let their property, if they have proof of their application.
However, the website does not specify how long the council can take to process the license applications, or what the landlords can do if the council fails to issue the license within a reasonable time.
Landlords who rent out properties that require a selective or HMO licence are at risk of being fined by councils for not having a licence, even if they have applied for one.
This is according to Phil Turtle, a director of Landlord Licensing & Defence, and he warns that the penalties for not having a licence are ‘draconian’.
He says these are criminal offences, but a landlord is protected from prosecution if they have ‘duly made’ an application for a licence.
Mr Turtle said: “Unfortunately, councils will rarely confirm that an application is duly made so it falls to the landlord or their licensing application company such as Landlord Licensing & Defence to keep records that demonstrate beyond reasonable doubt that the application has been duly made.
“It is not unknown for councils to claim that an application was not duly made so that they can help themselves to a £15,000+ fine.”
He advises landlords to keep records that prove that they have duly made an application, and to inform their tenants of this fact to prevent tenants from trying to claim back their rent or stop paying it, as the property is licensed as long as an application has been duly made.
Mr Turtle also criticised councils for being ‘incompetent’ at issuing licences, and for misusing the legislation to exploit landlords who are not supposed to be a ‘cash cow for councils’.
Next Article
Landlords face a property licensing boom in 2024
Arthur Oxford
10:56 AM, 9th February 2024, About 3 months ago
I am constantly baffled by the public sector and what their costs must be in relation to these licensing schemes. My understanding is that they have to be run as "not for profit", so that all of the monies gathered are 100% spent on the running of the schemes. They rake in £100s of thousands, enough to employ dozens of people/inspectors and yet they all seem to be in utter chaos. A private business simply couldn't operate in this way, but I guess that's the answer, as these public bodies have historically been awash with money, which has resulted in lazy, incompetent people running the show, happy to waste tax-payer's money as there never seems to be any comeback.
David
11:03 AM, 9th February 2024, About 3 months ago
Once the renewal application is duly made and the required fee (or part fee) paid, the landlord is covered and neither the Council nor the tenant would be able to exploit the situation. This is a non-story
DAMIEN RAFFERTY
11:58 AM, 9th February 2024, About 3 months ago
Well David I hope your right.
Having just completed my HMO licence renewal and paid the fee as soon as the the email arrived even though it does not expire till April.
Have had the HMO Inspection done for another 5 years and the new online application is More complex than ever!
Fingers crossed
Michael Booth
12:28 PM, 9th February 2024, About 3 months ago
Is it worth the hassle folks.?
Tim
13:20 PM, 9th February 2024, About 3 months ago
I relish reading these cases where LAs clearly feel that there is a battle and war out there to be vented against this unwieldy beast the private landlord. The press releases that I see where they wax lyrical about a court case won is unnecessarily gloating. Thst every LA seems to have different terms, conditions, rules and regulations and they themselves I think don’t have to comply with Gas Cert, EPC, EICR. But the icing on the cake when they make a mistake and people die as a result - nothing. No fine, no lost jobs, no criminal sentence. Grenfell a case in hand. Why no property journalist is picking the inequity of this beggars belief🤷♂️