Landlord MPs set to ‘torpedo’ Renters (Reform) Bill

Landlord MPs set to ‘torpedo’ Renters (Reform) Bill

9:28 AM, 18th March 2024, About 2 months ago 22

Text Size

Momentum is growing to torpedo the Renters (Reform) Bill that will abolish Section 21 ‘no-fault’ evictions and end fixed term tenancies, the Telegraph reports.

The news comes just days after The Sun revealed that angry Tory MPs have brought the Bill ‘close to collapse’.

Michael Gove, the housing secretary, vowed last month to pass the Bill before a General Election this year.

However, around 50 backbenchers have proposed amendments to the controversial legislation, which risks highlighting fractures in the Tory party.

The MPs are also warning that the Bill will lead to more homelessness and make housing more expensive.

Use a Section 21 notice to evict a tenant

Currently, landlords can use a Section 21 notice to evict a tenant but MPs worry about the new plans which will need court permission before a tenant can be eviction.

Landlords – including some sitting on the Commons benches – fear this could add months to evictions, with courts still unable to clear a pandemic-era backlog.

Under reforms, tenants who fall into arrears will also have a black mark placed against them – making it tougher to find a property in the future.

Marco Longhi, Conservative MP for Dudley North and a landlord, said while the Bill was ‘well-meaning’ it would backfire on the very tenants it was designed to help.

He added: “There will be a sustained move of private landlords exiting the market.

“It’s already happening, because they think it’s easier to invest elsewhere.

“A smaller pool of rental homes will lead to higher prices. That’s a simple economic fact.

“We need to build homes. Whatever attempts the Government makes to manipulate the market will always come back to this.”

‘Parts of this bill are bad for tenant’

Mr Longhi continued: “I absolutely know that parts of this bill are bad for tenants.

“It’s the law of unintended consequences.

“The bill was well-meaning, but I wish the Government would have involved all MPs – especially those of us who actually have a lot of experience in property.”

MPs from across the House have amended the Bill, including a mandatory review of the courts before a ban on no-fault evictions can be introduced.

Another amendment states that landlords cannot use the intention to sell or move in with a family member for at least the initial two years of a tenancy.

‘The big sticking point’ is rolling tenancies

One MP told the Telegraph that ‘the big sticking point’ between ministers and backbenchers is rolling tenancies, with the Government refusing to budge on the issue.

He said: “We want an amendment to be added so that if a landlord and tenant both agree to a fixed term, this will be allowed under the bill.

“Why is it the right of the Government to interfere in a contract between two parties?”

Critics are also pointing to the black mark on a tenant’s record following a court judgment would prevent many from finding somewhere else to live.

A Tory MP, who is a landlord, said: “An inadvertent consequence of abolishing section 21 is the risk of tenants who fall into arrears getting a court judgment against their name and ending up on the streets.

“Local authorities won’t help them and this will only add to the homelessness problem.”

He added: “The advantage to tenants of section 21 is that it’s no-fault, so even if they haven’t paid that won’t get written down.”

Yet to schedule sessions for amendments

The Bill is currently at the report stage and Tory whips are yet to schedule sessions for amendments to be debated by MPs in the Commons.

Chris Norris, of the National Residential Landlords Association (NRLA), said that MPs with personal experience as landlords are well-placed to pick holes in the draft policy.

He told the Telegraph: “If you’re a landlord yourself, you’re going to be more alive to those nuances and understand what the consequences will be.

“If you want to keep your business going, you want solid legislation.”

He added: “There’s criticism about the number of landlord MPs, but it should be beneficial that we leverage the wealth of experience we have in Parliament – from landlords running businesses to those doing casework on the part of tenants.”

Landlords are holding the Bill hostage

Shelter’s chief executive, Polly Neate, said landlords are holding the Bill hostage.

She added: “It is outrageous the government would allow the Renters (Reform) Bill to be held hostage by a small minority of MPs, many of them landlords, while renters are put through hell.

“With a General Election on the horizon, an overt betrayal of England’s 11 million renters will not be forgotten.

“The government must show its strength and oppose attempts to destroy or delay the bill from within its own ranks.”

Tom Darling, of the Renters’ Reform Coalition, said the bill would help to rebalance the ‘unequal relationship that results in tenants afraid to ask for basic repairs, stuck in unhealthy homes and unable to put down roots’.

He added: “It is outrageous that landlord MPs – all of whom were elected on a manifesto to deliver these moderate reforms – are now seeking to undermine the legislation.”


Share This Article


Comments

Cider Drinker

15:41 PM, 18th March 2024, About 2 months ago

Reply to the comment left by Ian Narbeth at 18/03/2024 - 14:55
The Labour Party, backed by a landslide victory in the next election, will make their ‘wretched changes’ regardless of whether or not the RRB is passed into Law by the Tories.

The ‘unintended consequences’ are well publicised and fully understood by Gove and co.

Monty Bodkin

15:43 PM, 18th March 2024, About 2 months ago

Reply to the comment left by JB at 18/03/2024 - 11:26
The effects of the faux Conservatives attacking landlords is starting to snowball. By the time Labour get in the PRS will be in a very poor state and they will have to deal with the consequences.

Realpolitik will decide.

Monty Bodkin

15:48 PM, 18th March 2024, About 2 months ago

Reply to the comment left by Ian Narbeth at 18/03/2024 - 14:55That's a really poor argument for supporting an awful Bill.

Even if it wasn't, the NRLA should be representing the views of the majority of landlords not their individual view.

Stella

16:02 PM, 18th March 2024, About 2 months ago

Reply to the comment left by Monty Bodkin at 18/03/2024 - 15:43
If you think that Labour will be forced to take a sensible approach given the mess the PRS will be in when they get into power well I just cannot see that happening.
When all the lefties who are lying low at the moment come out to play it will spell disaster for the PRS and of course for tenants but they are so blinkered they are not willing to see it.

Tony Phillips

20:49 PM, 18th March 2024, About 2 months ago

Reply to the comment left by JB at 18/03/2024 - 15:34
I just read a tiny bit, ot The UNs 2030 proposal. see below. Its a lovely warm fluffy fairytail of childishly impossible dreams. I've no idea what planet they're on but it ain't this one!

"Our vision
7. In these Goals and targets, we are setting out a supremely ambitious and transformational vision. We envisage a world free of poverty, hunger, disease and want, where all life can thrive. We envisage a world free of fear and violence."

It rambles on in this ludicrous vision of utopia. Wonder if Hammas and Putin have read it!

JC

21:33 PM, 18th March 2024, About 2 months ago

Reply to the comment left by Tony Phillips at 18/03/2024 - 20:49
There is more information available with a simple google search. Which raises the questions “why hasn’t this been reported in the media?”
And “why weren’t we offered a vote before adopting this as policy?”
Everything else is just white noise with the purpose of distracting us until 2030

Phil T

22:13 PM, 18th March 2024, About 2 months ago

Already sold up and enjoying no stress. No tax on turnover rather than profit. And no worries about maintenance, finding tenants, fixing problems, redecorating, insurance, mortgage rates and all the other things that were worth putting up with once but not anymore.

JC

7:19 AM, 19th March 2024, About 2 months ago

Reply to the comment left by JB at 18/03/2024 - 15:34
Its actually worse JB we are all going to become Democratic Socialists which is a term that will sound very similar to some used circa 1939 to 1945.
The amazing fact is that this whole idea started after WWI in the 1920's.
See the following link which is again freely available and again unreported by the press/media.
https://www.cvce.eu/content/publication/2006/4/24/87035567-586c-4a12-99e7-6857ee13f146/publishable_en.pdf

Mike Thomas

22:52 PM, 19th March 2024, About 2 months ago

Reply to the comment left by JB at 18/03/2024 - 11:26
Whether this bill goes through or not with the Tories is immaterial, as Labour would just seek to amend it even further if it does get passed.

Reluctant Landlord

9:41 AM, 20th March 2024, About 2 months ago

Reply to the comment left by Cider Drinker at 18/03/2024 - 15:41
i question that the consequences are actually 'unintended'....

Leave Comments

In order to post comments you will need to Sign In or Sign Up for a FREE Membership

or

Don't have an account? Sign Up

Landlord Tax Planning Book Now