Landlord cleared of knifepoint eviction charges

by Property118.com News Team

9:19 AM, 24th May 2011
About 9 years ago

Landlord cleared of knifepoint eviction charges

Make Text Bigger
Landlord cleared of knifepoint eviction charges

A landlord was cleared of harassment after his son tried to evict two tenants from a shared house at knife-point with a gang of men.

The case arose from a dispute over an illegal eviction from a house in multiple occupation (HMO) Mohammed Qureshi managed for his niece in Peterborough.

A defective notice to quit was served on two men living in the house. The day the notice expired, the tenants had not left, so Qureshi’s son and five other men demanded they should go.

One of the men with Qureshi’s son produced a knife to threaten the tenants and urged the others to throw the tenants’ belongings in to the street.

The gang then left. Qureshi visited the house and the tenants complained about what had happened.

Later, he returned to the house with his son who racially abused the tenants.

Qureshi was subsequently prosecuted for harassing the tenants. The judge decided there was no case to answer because the Protection from Eviction Act 1977 places no responsibility on the landlord for the actions of others.

Section 1(3A) of the act states: “the landlord of a residential occupier or an agent of the landlord shall be guilty of an offence if— (a) he does acts likely to interfere with the peace or comfort of the residential occupier or members of his household, or … and … he knows, or has reasonable cause to believe, that that conduct is likely to cause the residential occupier to give up the occupation of the whole or part of the premises or to refrain from exercising any right or pursuing any remedy in respect of the whole or part of the premises.”

The case was appealed by the Crown, and at the Court of Appeal, Lord Justice Laws dismissed the appeal and acquitted Qureshi.

The judgment did not cover what the likely outcome of the case would have been if Qureshi and his son were jointly charged with the offence, as no such allegation was made in court.



Comments

22:08 PM, 30th May 2011
About 9 years ago

I think this is really bad, why on earth would the judge let them off with this, after all its clear that the son was acting for his father why else was he there. And why is it acceptable for people of colour to throw racial insults at white people without any consequences.


Leave Comments

Please Log-In OR Become a member to reply to comments or subscribe to new comment notifications.

Forgotten your password?

OR

BECOME A MEMBER

Hackney adds a £50k Social Housing contribution from developers!

The Landlords Union

Become a Member, it's FREE

Our mission is to facilitate the sharing of best practice amongst UK landlords, tenants and letting agents

Learn More