9:31 AM, 30th July 2024, About A year ago 6
Text Size
Categories:
The Labour government has committed to build 1.5 million homes during the next parliament and has pledged to adopt a strategic approach to the green belt.
A new report by property consultants Carter Jonas explores what this means for green belt land.
Labour intends to build on ‘grey belt’ land and brownfield sites rather than the green belt.
According to Carter Jonas’s report, the green belt has recently expanded by 25,443 hectares (1.6%), bringing its coverage back to levels last seen in 2004.
Despite Labour’s ambitious target of constructing 300,000 homes annually, Carter Jonas’ research suggests that even if all these homes were built on green belt land—which is highly unlikely—the area affected would only be about 3% of the current green belt extent.
David Churchill Partner at Carter Jonas said: “Our research shows that housing needs can be met without substantial loss to the green belt. We are not advocating all new homes being located on the green belt but are suggesting that there are strategic benefits in releasing some green belt land for housing.
“For example, it could reduce the number of ‘leapfrogging’ developments – those located further from urban areas than is desirable, which increase residents’ carbon footprints through extensive commutes and impacts on both businesses’ and residents’ proximity to urban centres.”
The report also looks at regional impacts. In London, meeting the housing target would require using 21.1% of green belt land.
In contrast, in five other regions—South East, North West, North East, East of England, West Midlands, and Yorkshire and the Humber—less than 3% of green belt land would be needed.
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Previous Article
£20M To Fix Housing Crisis?Next Article
Landlords face £34,000 repair bill nightmare
northern landlord
Read Full Bio
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since March 2022 - Comments: 346
11:06 AM, 30th July 2024, About A year ago
There are lots of definitions about what constitutes Green Belt and Brownfield sites but “Grey Belt” is nothing more than a made up slogan for publicity purposes like “night Starvation” and boomerang smells”. Who decides what is Grey Belt? Could be any of what you night have previously assumed was Green Belt is the most likely answer
DAMIEN RAFFERTY
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since September 2022 - Comments: 176
11:16 AM, 30th July 2024, About A year ago
Lots of farmland being built on in Cheshire.
Lots of brownfield sites available but extra cost of clearing and removing both old buildings and contaminated ground means developers won’t touch it
Paul Essex
Read Full Bio
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since June 2019 - Comments: 647
18:35 PM, 30th July 2024, About A year ago
Grey belt = former green belt not visible from a labour mp’s house. Ideally in a Conservative voting area.
Reluctant Landlord
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since September 2018 - Comments: 3335 - Articles: 5
20:16 PM, 30th July 2024, About A year ago
Grey belt – a polluted brownfield area which is too expensive to bio-remediate/ clear and so is economically non viable to be utilised.
If it were that easy/viable there would be no ‘grey belt’ land in existence.
Are Labour plans to ‘boost the economy’ really about setting targets that are completely unachievable and expecting private finance to fund it all where there is no viable profit/return?
Question – how was there permission to utilise virgin green belt land in the first place for it to later become deemed ‘grey belt’?
Tom Jenkin
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since March 2023 - Comments: 37
22:01 PM, 30th July 2024, About A year ago
If you think labour will meet there target of 300,000 houses a year, then I have a bridge to sell you.
This year only 134,567 houses will be built and next you only 125,450 are planned .
The house builders cannot get the trades people required to build anymore houses , they need to recruit 52,000 people this year to complete 230,000 homes in 2025 . There is a huge skills shortage in the housing industry.
Beaver
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since May 2018 - Comments: 1959
15:02 PM, 2nd August 2024, About A year ago
Reply to the comment left by Tom Jenkin at 30/07/2024 – 22:01
Even if they build them they still need someone to pay for them.
This post:
https://inews.co.uk/news/thousands-unused-affordable-homes-empty-housing-scandal-3204602#:~:text=The%20snapshot%20survey%20of%2013,under%20Section%20106%20planning%20deals
Says that thousands of unused affordable homes are sitting empty because housing associations can’t afford to pay for them.
Labour’s “golden rules” are supposed to drive 50% affordable housing.
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/housing-targets-increased-to-get-britain-building-again
These “golden rules” do not appear to include “…knowing how to pay for them.”