8 months ago | 8 comments
A Labour politician has expressed support for the Renters’ Rights Bill, despite pushback from local landlords and letting agents.
Labour MP for Basingstoke Luke Murphy claims to the Basingstoke Gazette that “tenants do not have control over their homes.”
However, landlords and letting agents in the area have voiced concerns over the bill, particularly over the cost of stricter enforcement rules.
Mr Murphy told the Basingstoke Gazette: “For too long, we had a rental market where tenants could be kicked out with short notice without thought of eviction, and don’t have enough control over their homes, or pets that they may be able to have in their building or how they decorate.
“But ultimately these are people’s homes, people rent and live here, so I really welcome and back the Labour government’s plan.”
However, a letting agent in the Basingstoke area hit back at the comments and claimed the bill will have a huge impact on landlords.
Andrew Sheldon, sales and letting manager at Martin & Co, in Basingstoke says he is holding an event for landlords to understand how the bill will impact them.
In a Facebook post, reported by the Basingstoke Gazette, Mr Sheldon warns: “The new Renters’ Rights Bill will scrap fixed-term tenancies and every tenancy will become periodic. This means tenants can give just two months’ notice at any time, leaving landlords with unexpected voids.
“On top of that, stricter rules on evictions, higher property standards, and limits on rent increases are getting worse, and could cost landlords thousands in fines or lost income.”
Under the Renters’ Rights Bill, landlords will face higher fines with civil penalties for non-compliance, starting at £7,000 and rising to a maximum civil penalty of up to £40,000.
The Labour government says the bill will give tenants more power to challenge excessive rent increases. Landlords will only be allowed to raise rent once a year and must provide tenants with two months’ formal notice using a Section 13 notice.
If tenants believe the proposed increase is above the market rate, they can challenge it at the First-tier Tribunal, which will decide the appropriate market rent.
Mr Murphy defended the Renters’ Rights Bill and said he hopes landlords will take a positive approach.
He told the Basingstoke Gazette: “I recognise that many landlords are good landlords, and that we have to design a system that works for both good landlords and tenants, and I think this is the system that we are designing.
“But ultimately, this is about providing the very best homes for tenants in Basingstoke, and I think these are positive reforms, which I hope landlords will engage with in a positive manner.”
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Previous Article
Rising costs push second homeowners toward holiday letsNext Article
London council takes control of landlord's 18 homes
8 months ago | 8 comments
9 months ago | 9 comments
10 months ago | 2 comments
Sorry. You must be logged in to view this form.
Member Since February 2020 - Comments: 360
9:58 AM, 27th August 2025, About 8 months ago
“tenants do not have control over their homes.”
Where’s the balance.
It’s not their home, it’s their lease.
What about the other party, the landlord. Don’t they deserve some control over what they paid for?
No respect for property rights.
Member Since July 2013 - Comments: 754
10:24 AM, 27th August 2025, About 8 months ago
Tenants have the same (or greater) “rights” over their rented home whether or not they pay the rent or look after the property. Where in that scenario does the LL have any control?
Member Since May 2015 - Comments: 2197 - Articles: 2
11:45 AM, 27th August 2025, About 8 months ago
It is fortunate for Mr Murphy that the asylum is full.
Member Since September 2018 - Comments: 3524 - Articles: 5
12:08 PM, 27th August 2025, About 8 months ago
“tenants do not have control over their homes.”
Correct, they don’t have control because my name is on the property deeds.
They rent the space. A contract was offered regarding obligations. They agreed and signed it. They can give notice anytime and it will be accepted.
Next applicant please…..
Member Since June 2015 - Comments: 333
1:43 PM, 27th August 2025, About 8 months ago
If they want total control they should buy their own house. Then make sure they pay the mortgage every month so they don’t get repossessed. Obviously make sure it’s freehold, not leasehold, if they don’t want to comply with rules regarding pets, noise and maintenance.
Member Since March 2024 - Comments: 281
2:28 PM, 27th August 2025, About 8 months ago
Very telling that Angela Rayner had £800k capital / borrowing ability to chuck at further property purchase after sorting her own housing needs (owned detached house and free use of a London flat near where she is based for work although she appears to struggle with that concept) but is astute enough to realise that keeping a property empty with some personal use is preferable to becoming a landlord.
Even one of her Labour supporters was quoted as saying ‘at least she’s never been a landlord’.
I’ll take my lead from the organ grinder, most of my portfolio gone now but I’ll be keeping my second home.