Labour calls for a ‘Renters’ Charter’

Labour calls for a ‘Renters’ Charter’

10:47 AM, 3rd April 2023, About A year ago 103

Text Size

Labour MP Diane Abbott appeared on ITV’s ‘Good Morning Britain’ today (Monday) to push for a renters’ charter that will help protect tenants.

The segment highlighted that the number of available homes for renting in the UK has dropped by a third in the last 18 months – but rent prices have seen a 20% increase in the last three years.

Now, Ms Abbott is calling on the government to encourage more responsible private landlords.

‘One of the problems of stratospheric rents’

She said: “Rents are stratospheric and one of the problems of stratospheric rents is that a lot of younger people are not going to be able to buy because every penny is going on rent.

“With landlords, we want to encourage good landlords, but we want to bear down on bad landlords.”

When asked what a bad landlord is by the presenter Kate Garraway, Ms Abbott replied: “A bad landlord is somebody that first of all uses the no-fault eviction to get you out, and a bad landlord is someone who puts up the rent every six months, every three months and that is what is causing renters so many problems.

“There’s no certainty because bad landlords just want to exploit the market.”

Government is set to end Section 21 ‘no-fault’ evictions

Ms Garraway highlighted that the government is set to end Section 21 ‘no-fault’ evictions, but Ms Abbott said there was no sign of the legislation.

She added: “It’s not down for debate in Parliament and a Labour government would put an end to no-fault evictions.”

Co-presenter Richard Madeley then asked Ms Abbott about the anecdotal stories of landlords charging potential tenants just to view a property.

Ms Abbott said: “They are now charging just to look at a property, some of them are charging a relatively small amount, £30, but some of them are charging hundreds of pounds.”

Ms Garraway said that a programme journalist had investigated and could find no evidence that landlords are charging potential tenants to view a property, other than in one or two anecdotal cases.

She added that the law, since 2020, has made the paying of these fees illegal and asked Ms Abbott where she was getting her evidence.

Accepted that hers was anecdotal evidence

Ms Abbott accepted that hers was anecdotal evidence and there was no survey evidence but ‘a lot of estate agents’ are saying that tenants are being charged and ‘this is something that needs to be cracked down on’.

Ms Abbott continued: “One of the things a Labour government would do is to bring in a renters’ charter and one of the things that would say is in no circumstances can landlords charge just to view a property.”

The presenter highlighted that there is already a law to prevent this from happening, so there would be no reason to bring in a law to deal with the issue but Ms Abbott replied: “But it doesn’t seem to be biting, does it? Because you hear too much anecdotal evidence, certainly in London, of people charging to view.”

This is the interview on Twitter from Good Morning Britain with Ms Abbott.


Share This Article


Comments

steve p

9:39 AM, 10th April 2023, About A year ago

Reply to the comment left by Beaver at 03/04/2023 - 11:58
Well I have used S21, to remove a tenant that was a drug taking anti social tenant that made life hell for neighbours, last month she stopped paying rent, damaged the property, moved out without telling me.. couple years later she was imprisoned for driving while disqualified and high on drugs she crashed through an old ladys house and killed her..

But yeah im the bad landlord lets protect tenants like her, poor innocent tenants, not a single one of them deserved a S21 notice..

John

11:44 AM, 12th April 2023, About A year ago

That woman is as thick as rice pudding.
Why do the broadcasters give air time to someone who is so ignorant and ill informed.
She is dangerous.

TheMaluka

11:51 AM, 12th April 2023, About A year ago

Reply to the comment left by steve p at 10/04/2023 - 09:39
You used section 21 because she had done nothing wrong?

Luke P

11:52 AM, 12th April 2023, About A year ago

Reply to the comment left by John at 12/04/2023 - 11:44
Because she's a box-ticker and darling of the Left.

Ian Narbeth

12:48 PM, 12th April 2023, About A year ago

Reply to the comment left by TheMaluka at 12/04/2023 - 11:51I suspect he along with many landlords used s21 because it is quicker. Reckless driving and killing someone are not per se reasons to evict. Non-payment of rent is but if all bar just under two months arrears are paid off before the court date, the s8 claim may fail.
Damage to the property sufficient to ground an eviction claim is difficult to prove and if the tenant lies about it, the judge may accept her word.
In the case of a tenant such as the one described, why can people not accept that landlords should just want to end the relationship, full stop, without having to air everything in court?

TheMaluka

12:53 PM, 12th April 2023, About A year ago

Reply to the comment left by Ian Narbeth at 12/04/2023 - 12:48Ian it was intended as an ironic comment, irony verging on sarcasm with a touch of humour..

Beaver

13:42 PM, 12th April 2023, About A year ago

Reply to the comment left by steve p at 10/04/2023 - 09:39
So if there was a tenants and landlords charter (as opposed to a landlord-bashing, vote-grabbing sound-bite from a left-wing activist) what would this tenants and landlords charter need to look like for private landlords like you and me not to need S21?

Contendedted

9:45 AM, 13th April 2023, About A year ago

Reply to the comment left by Ian Narbeth at 05/04/2023 - 11:39
Thanks for pointing this out Ian. This is a strong argument for S21 that most reasonable people should understand and hopefully agree with.

Contendedted

9:56 AM, 13th April 2023, About A year ago

Reply to the comment left by NewYorkie at 06/04/2023 - 11:28
Thanks for your comment. My situation is similar to Dylan’s. Incorporation with all the associated costs is not worth it and our kids would be burdened as there is not enough equity to cover properties being auctioned off, or sold to a fast cash buyer.

Luke P

10:22 AM, 13th April 2023, About A year ago

Reply to the comment left by Ian Narbeth at 12/04/2023 - 12:48
Because Judges are really in place to ensure the will of their masters, the Government. It *always* gives final day to them and not action at the behest of the LL.

When LLs are (legitimately) winning all their S.8 evictions and they can’t really cheat, they’ll either use paperwork ‘technicalities’ or simply Court backlogs to delay as long as possible…every extra night as the LLs problem is one less night in (expensive) emergency accommodation, right?

Leave Comments

In order to post comments you will need to Sign In or Sign Up for a FREE Membership

or

Don't have an account? Sign Up

Landlord Tax Planning Book Now