Labour announces major overhaul of homebuying system to cut costs and delays

Labour announces major overhaul of homebuying system to cut costs and delays

Model house in a shopping cart with coins and keys, symbolizing first-time homebuyer reforms
9:47 AM, 6th October 2025, 7 months ago 9

The Labour government has announced the biggest shake-up to the homebuying system in decades.

Under the proposals, which aim to cut costs and stress for homebuyers, sellers and estate agents will be required to provide buyers with vital information about a property upfront, including the condition of the home, leasehold costs, and any chains of people waiting to move.

The government says this could speed up the long, drawn-out and costly process of buying a home by up to four weeks.

Our reforms will fix the broken system

The government say the proposed plans will save first-time buyers  £710 on average when buying a home.

Housing Secretary, Steve Reed, said: “Buying a home should be a dream, not a nightmare.

“Our reforms will fix the broken system so hardworking people can focus on the next chapter of their lives.

“Through our Plan for Change, we are putting more money back into working people’s pockets and making a simple dream a simple reality.”

Under the proposed plans, binding contracts could be introduced to stop people walking away from agreements after buyers painstakingly spend months in negotiations. According to government figures, failed transactions cost the economy £1.5 billion a year.

Other plans include introducing mandatory qualifications and ‘Code of Practice’ for estate, letting and managing agents.

Sellers and estate agents must publish information from searches and surveys before a property listing is published.

The full list of proposed mandatory upfront information includes: tenure, council tax band, EPC rating, property type, legal and transactional information such as title information and seller ID verification, leasehold terms, building safety data, standard searches, property condition assessments tailored to property age and type, service charges, planning consents, flood risk data, chain status, and clear floor plans.

Industry reaction to proposals

Nathan Emerson, CEO at Propertymark, said: “Propertymark welcomes the UK Government’s renewed commitment to reforming the home buying and selling process, with a clear focus on digitisation, transparency, and stronger consumer protection – all underpinned by mandatory professional qualifications for property agents.

“Embedding recognised standards is essential to raising professionalism, giving consumers greater confidence, and ensuring consistently higher levels of service.

“Equally, it is vital that reforms are evidence-based and informed by those who understand the realities of the sector on the ground. Agents work with buyers and sellers every day, and their experience will be crucial to ensure changes are practical, proportionate, and effective.”

RICS CEO Justin Young, said: “RICS have long supported reform of the home buying and selling process, which is too often stressful, costly, and brings uncertainty to buyers and sellers.

“The government’s commitment to an industry consultation is a vital step forward, and RICS will brings its expertise to the table. By embedding transparency, professionalism, and innovation into the buying and selling process, we can help build a housing market that works better for everyone.”

Paul Whitehead CEO at Zoopla said: “The homebuying process in the UK remains far too long, too complex, too uncertain and has seen far less digital innovation than many other sectors.

“Consumers are clear in their desire for greater transparency and confidence when making life’s biggest purchase and improving the visibility of trusted information earlier in the buying process is a key part of speeding up the journey.

“The property industry recognises the benefits that greater certainty and digital transformation could bring. Introducing legally binding contracts alongside better use of digital solutions has the potential to unlock significant demand and reduce failed transactions.”


Share This Article

Comments

  • Member Since July 2013 - Comments: 2002 - Articles: 21

    10:48 AM, 6th October 2025, About 7 months ago

    This looks like a re-run of the debacle of Home Information Packs.
    An unavoidable problem is that searches have a limited shelf life. Lenders, in particular, won’t accept them after a period of time, typically 3 months, So the seller has to renew the search or take out indemnity insurance at additional cost.. A survey also speaks at a particular point in time. Buyers and lenders, in particular, may not be happy with a survey that is 6 months old. So the seller’s costs will increase.
    Apart from a few local authorities, local searches are turned around quickly. Surveys can be commissioned within a few days.
    It is chains that cause delays as everyone has to move at the speed of the slowest and if anyone drops out the whole chain may collapse.
    The assertion that “Through our Plan for Change, we are putting more money back into working people’s pockets and making a simple dream a simple reality” is pie in the sky. Sellers’ increased costs may be passed on (rather as many auction special conditions now require the buyer to pay the commission and the seller’s solicitors’ fees).
    House buying is rarely simple unless you are a cash buyer with a reasonable tolerance for risk and time and resources to sort out any problems after completion.

  • Member Since August 2016 - Comments: 508

    11:18 AM, 6th October 2025, About 7 months ago

    I am not a conveyancer, so must write with care. Looking at my former colleagues in this field, I realise it’s not just paper for its own sake and stamp swaps but does have real problems. Chains breaking, even if number three decides not to move after all, messes up for everyone? Gazumping and gazundering should be illegal – why not learn and borrow from the Scots system where I am told that a handshake commitment disposes of that as the agreement is there?
    I don’t recall Home Information Packs being acclaimed as a roaring success, is the new framework any real improvement?
    Need specialist conveyancers to come to the aid of the party, please?

  • Member Since September 2018 - Comments: 3538 - Articles: 5

    11:38 AM, 6th October 2025, About 7 months ago

    another load of waffle and not understanding of the REAL reasons why delays occur in the process.

    Nothing ‘reforms’ a broken system. By default it’s broken and there are many reasons for this – rarely one simple easy ‘fix’ works.

  • Member Since September 2019 - Comments: 15

    4:16 PM, 6th October 2025, About 7 months ago

    Buying a home should be a dream, not a nightmare.
    What do they think a nightmare is then ?

  • Member Since July 2013 - Comments: 2002 - Articles: 21

    4:33 PM, 6th October 2025, About 7 months ago

    Reply to the comment left by Blodwyn at 06/10/2025 – 11:18
    I am a conveyancer, albeit I don’t do much residential buying and selling. Home Information Packs were suspended in 2010 – see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Home_Information_Pack

    A better pre-contract commitment would be a good idea, e.g. buyer and seller put up say 1% of the price as a good faith deposit, forfeitable if one party withdraws without good reason. (Devil in detail as to what is a good reason but it would include the seller not having good and marketable title or serious defects that made the property unmortgageable).

  • Member Since May 2024 - Comments: 74

    10:06 AM, 11th October 2025, About 6 months ago

    Reply to the comment left by alan thomas at 06/10/2025 – 16:16
    Five years of a Labour government!

  • Member Since March 2023 - Comments: 4

    11:24 PM, 12th October 2025, About 6 months ago

    Reply to the comment left by Ian Narbeth at 06/10/2025 – 10:48
    Home Info Packs work fine in Scotland – even if the odd one would need to be updated because of a slow market, that would be simple and more economic than paying for a full one. It also stops multiple potential buyers paying surveyors for a survey (which the surveyor only did once yet charges multiple times for) before they make up their mind. And some Estate Agents could do with being regulated…

    So bring on the changes.

  • Member Since March 2023 - Comments: 1506

    8:47 AM, 13th October 2025, About 6 months ago

    HIPS 2 .. HIPS was a good idea with one fatal flaw – the included survey didn’t have to be accepted by lenders, thereby a waste of money. As I understand it HIPS 2 does not include a survey so very good chance it might work.

  • Member Since August 2016 - Comments: 508

    11:31 AM, 14th October 2025, About 6 months ago

    If it’s put forward by these stumblebums, it will be designed to fail?

Have Your Say

Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.

Not a member yet? Join In Seconds


Login with

or