James Cleverley blames Labour’s Renters’ Rights Act after receiving Section 21 notice
The Shadow Housing Secretary has said he has received a Section 21 notice, blaming Labour’s housing reforms for prompting landlords to sell up.
Speaking at a London Housing Conference, James Cleverly said the notice was issued after his landlord decided to sell the property.
He also warned that the Renters’ Rights Act will do more harm than good.
Renters’ Rights Act will not protect tenants
Mr Cleverly said his experience of receiving a Section 21 notice is “replicated thousands of times across the country”.
He blamed the Labour government for the Renters’ Rights Act, arguing that despite claims it is meant to protect tenants, it will have the opposite effect.
Speaking to PoliticsHome, he said: “The key bit of this is the arrogance with which Labour approached this process. They just refuse to listen to the points we’re making because it was we who were making those points.
“Unfortunately, now the people who are suffering are the people who could and should have a decent supply of properties in the private rented sector, and they don’t.
“The people who they claim to want to protect are the very people who are being disadvantaged by this and it didn’t have to be like this. If the Labour Party weren’t so arrogant and unwilling to listen, it wouldn’t be happening.”
Conservatives failed to ban Section 21
A Labour source hit back and told PoliticsHome: “The Shadow Housing Secretary will be furious when he finds out who is responsible for allowing no-fault evictions to continue.
“It’s his Conservative Party that failed to ban them during their 14 years in office.
“Labour in government is putting things right and ending this unfair practice to protect renters from suddenly being thrown out of their homes for no reason. If he has changed his views and now agrees with us, he should cross the floor and join Labour.”
The news comes ahead of the Renters’ Rights Act coming into force on 1 May 2026.
Comments
Have Your Say
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Previous Article
Councils with selective licensing schemes must think we are stupid
Member Since December 2023 - Comments: 1590
9:00 PM, 24th April 2026, About 9 hours ago
Reply to the comment left by Robert M at 24/04/2026 – 12:45
Robert said…
It should be remembered of course that some of the s21 Notices that have been served recently, are just precautionary, i.e. they have been served before the RRA kicks in and prevents them being served in the future, as this means that they can be used within the next 12 months, IF NEEDED. It does not necessarily mean that the landlords will instigate possession proceedings (unless the tenant gives them cause to do so).
***
This is not true.
Landlords only have until 31st July 2026 to seek possession through the courts.
I trust you are not a landlord.
Member Since May 2024 - Comments: 117
10:08 PM, 24th April 2026, About 8 hours ago
Reply to the comment left by Cider Drinker at 24/04/2026 – 08:57
Also a 3% increase in mortgage/saving rates since 2022 changes the dynamic of rental economics completely. With no large capital gain in sight to save the day, we are looking at returns only slightly better than bank bonds if we are lucky with our tenants.
Member Since January 2023 - Comments: 28
12:30 AM, 25th April 2026, About 6 hours ago
Reply to the comment left by Beaver at 24/04/2026 – 13:50
For the Labour Party, it is ideological. Even if it knew for certain, in advance, what the negative consequences would be, it did not really care.
Member Since January 2023 - Comments: 28
12:30 AM, 25th April 2026, About 6 hours ago
For the Labour Party, it is ideological. Even if it knew for certain, in advance, what the negative consequences would be, it did not really care.
Member Since October 2024 - Comments: 25
1:07 AM, 25th April 2026, About 5 hours ago
Reply to the comment left by Beaver at 24/04/2026 – 14:09
Agreed. Surely nobody in their right mind would vote for the “Green” thickos”? Due to old age and “all of the above”, I Praise the Lord that I am now almost out of this unholy mess 🙂