10 months ago | 4 comments
The government has set out plans to tighten Right to Rent checks as part of a new consultation.
Under the proposals, it makes clear that prospective tenants must not be treated unfairly if they choose a method of completing the mandatory checks that differs from a landlord or letting agent’s preferred approach.
Landlords and letting agents have until 29 April to submit their responses.
Right to Rent rules were introduced in England under the Immigration Act 2014. They require landlords to verify the immigration status of potential tenants before a tenancy begins, ensuring they have the legal right to live in the UK.
The National Residential Landlords Association (NRLA) writes on its website that, under the proposals, landlords would be “explicitly banned from treating prospective tenants less favourably because their right to rent is time-limited or because of how they choose to prove their status, for example, by preferring a passport over other forms of identification, or favouring online checks over physical documents.”
It adds that “the plans will also make it a requirement for landlords to ensure any Digital Verification Services (DVS) used to carry out online checks are officially certified.”
In the draft code of guidance published by the government, landlords and letting agents are advised on how to avoid discrimination when carrying out Right to Rent checks.
The guidance says the best way to prevent discrimination is to “treat all prospective tenants fairly and consistently”.
It says that, to avoid discrimination under the Right to Rent Scheme, landlords and letting agents should:
It also says that landlords and agents should not:
The guidance warns that landlords who discriminate in the course of Right to Rent checks, contrary to the Equality Act 2010, may face discrimination claims in court.
Landlords can view the consultation by clicking here.
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
10 months ago | 4 comments
7 months ago | 8 comments
Sorry. You must be logged in to view this form.
Member Since June 2019 - Comments: 800
8:34 AM, 21st April 2026, About 3 weeks ago
So how easy is it to evict someone when their time limit to stay expires. Fully automatic without fuss – not a chance, expensive court hassle – now almost certain, so why would we not discriminate against such people?
Member Since January 2017 - Comments: 117
10:34 AM, 21st April 2026, About 3 weeks ago
At the end of the day, sensible landlords will choose who they want, not someone who does not fit their criteria. I’d rather leave a property empty than have a tenant who does not fit MY criteria. MY HOUSE – MY CHOICE.
Member Since April 2021 - Comments: 95
11:48 AM, 21st April 2026, About 3 weeks ago
Requiring landlords to ascertain the legal status of a prospective tenant always was a deliberate dereliction of duty by the Home Office. Another example of the camel’s nose under the tent.
Member Since October 2020 - Comments: 1194
2:19 PM, 21st April 2026, About 3 weeks ago
Asking for 6 or 12 months rent in advance has been quite common with tenancies offered to foreign nationals who have no credit history here. Now that this is illegal, many landlords are already saying they can no longer accept them. Ensuring that this reason is carefully documented when assessing their applications is going to be essential to avoid claims of discrimination on the basis of rent to rent or ethnic/national origin.
Member Since April 2026 - Comments: 1
6:33 PM, 22nd April 2026, About 3 weeks ago
Reply to the comment left by Lordship at 21/04/2026 – 10:34
Except the way things are going its going to be your house not your choice, the greens have already said if they get voted in they will take control of the PRS through legislation and effectively ban private landlords, and yes thats the extreme side of it, but in all reality it will probably end up where you cant legally leave a property empty and if it is for a certain period the local council will step in to begin the process of allocating you a tenant, at which point youll jump to put on in and it may be one you dislike but atleast it will be one you’ve chosen and not one you’ve had zero choice in.
Member Since May 2024 - Comments: 123
8:34 PM, 22nd April 2026, About 3 weeks ago
Blimey. Not only is it our legal responsibility (for some reason) to check that a prospective tenant has the right to be in the UK, we also have to pander to the criteria which that individual is ‘comfortable’ to share.
I think I am one of many landlords who’s current tenants will be their last. The government wins. They can bring in their corporate buddies from Thames Water Rentals and get on with it.