9 months ago | 4 comments
The government has set out plans to tighten Right to Rent checks as part of a new consultation.
Under the proposals, it makes clear that prospective tenants must not be treated unfairly if they choose a method of completing the mandatory checks that differs from a landlord or letting agent’s preferred approach.
Landlords and letting agents have until 29 April to submit their responses.
Right to Rent rules were introduced in England under the Immigration Act 2014. They require landlords to verify the immigration status of potential tenants before a tenancy begins, ensuring they have the legal right to live in the UK.
The National Residential Landlords Association (NRLA) writes on its website that, under the proposals, landlords would be “explicitly banned from treating prospective tenants less favourably because their right to rent is time-limited or because of how they choose to prove their status, for example, by preferring a passport over other forms of identification, or favouring online checks over physical documents.”
It adds that “the plans will also make it a requirement for landlords to ensure any Digital Verification Services (DVS) used to carry out online checks are officially certified.”
In the draft code of guidance published by the government, landlords and letting agents are advised on how to avoid discrimination when carrying out Right to Rent checks.
The guidance says the best way to prevent discrimination is to “treat all prospective tenants fairly and consistently”.
It says that, to avoid discrimination under the Right to Rent Scheme, landlords and letting agents should:
It also says that landlords and agents should not:
The guidance warns that landlords who discriminate in the course of Right to Rent checks, contrary to the Equality Act 2010, may face discrimination claims in court.
Landlords can view the consultation by clicking here.
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
9 months ago | 4 comments
6 months ago | 8 comments
Sorry. You must be logged in to view this form.