Government launches review to tackle discrimination in Right to Rent checks

Government launches review to tackle discrimination in Right to Rent checks

Illustration of tenant screening with one applicant singled out, symbolising discrimination in Right to Rent checks.
12:01 AM, 21st April 2026, 3 weeks ago 6
Categories:

The government has set out plans to tighten Right to Rent checks as part of a new consultation.

Under the proposals, it makes clear that prospective tenants must not be treated unfairly if they choose a method of completing the mandatory checks that differs from a landlord or letting agent’s preferred approach.

Landlords and letting agents have until 29 April to submit their responses.

Explicitly banned from treating prospective tenants less favourably

Right to Rent rules were introduced in England under the Immigration Act 2014. They require landlords to verify the immigration status of potential tenants before a tenancy begins, ensuring they have the legal right to live in the UK.

The National Residential Landlords Association (NRLA) writes on its website that, under the proposals, landlords would be “explicitly banned from treating prospective tenants less favourably because their right to rent is time-limited or because of how they choose to prove their status, for example, by preferring a passport over other forms of identification, or favouring online checks over physical documents.”

It adds that “the plans will also make it a requirement for landlords to ensure any Digital Verification Services (DVS) used to carry out online checks are officially certified.”

How to avoid discrimination

In the draft code of guidance published by the government, landlords and letting agents are advised on how to avoid discrimination when carrying out Right to Rent checks.

The guidance says the best way to prevent discrimination is to “treat all prospective tenants fairly and consistently”.

It says that, to avoid discrimination under the Right to Rent Scheme, landlords and letting agents should:

  • be consistent in how they carry out checks for all prospective tenants, including those they believe are more likely to be British citizens
  • ensure that no prospective tenants are discouraged or excluded, either directly or indirectly, because of a known or perceived protected characteristic
  • ensure that automated or digital onboarding processes do not create or reinforce discriminatory outcomes

It also says that landlords and agents should not:

  • discriminate when conducting Right to Rent checks
  • only check the status of people they believe appear to be, or are likely to be, migrants
  • treat tenants with a time-limited right to rent more or less favourably
  • treat those using the Home Office online checking service differently
  • show preference for, or disadvantage those providing, manual documents from the approved list
  • make assumptions about a person’s right to rent or immigration status based on colour, nationality, ethnic or national origins, accent, or length of time in the UK

The guidance warns that landlords who discriminate in the course of Right to Rent checks, contrary to the Equality Act 2010, may face discrimination claims in court.

Landlords can view the consultation by clicking here.


Share This Article

Comments

  • Member Since June 2019 - Comments: 800

    8:34 AM, 21st April 2026, About 3 weeks ago

    So how easy is it to evict someone when their time limit to stay expires. Fully automatic without fuss – not a chance, expensive court hassle – now almost certain, so why would we not discriminate against such people?

  • Member Since January 2017 - Comments: 117

    10:34 AM, 21st April 2026, About 3 weeks ago

    At the end of the day, sensible landlords will choose who they want, not someone who does not fit their criteria. I’d rather leave a property empty than have a tenant who does not fit MY criteria. MY HOUSE – MY CHOICE.

  • Member Since April 2021 - Comments: 95

    11:48 AM, 21st April 2026, About 3 weeks ago

    Requiring landlords to ascertain the legal status of a prospective tenant always was a deliberate dereliction of duty by the Home Office. Another example of the camel’s nose under the tent.

  • Member Since October 2020 - Comments: 1194

    2:19 PM, 21st April 2026, About 3 weeks ago

    Asking for 6 or 12 months rent in advance has been quite common with tenancies offered to foreign nationals who have no credit history here. Now that this is illegal, many landlords are already saying they can no longer accept them. Ensuring that this reason is carefully documented when assessing their applications is going to be essential to avoid claims of discrimination on the basis of rent to rent or ethnic/national origin.

  • Member Since April 2026 - Comments: 1

    6:33 PM, 22nd April 2026, About 3 weeks ago

    Reply to the comment left by Lordship at 21/04/2026 – 10:34
    Except the way things are going its going to be your house not your choice, the greens have already said if they get voted in they will take control of the PRS through legislation and effectively ban private landlords, and yes thats the extreme side of it, but in all reality it will probably end up where you cant legally leave a property empty and if it is for a certain period the local council will step in to begin the process of allocating you a tenant, at which point youll jump to put on in and it may be one you dislike but atleast it will be one you’ve chosen and not one you’ve had zero choice in.

  • Member Since May 2024 - Comments: 123

    8:34 PM, 22nd April 2026, About 3 weeks ago

    Blimey. Not only is it our legal responsibility (for some reason) to check that a prospective tenant has the right to be in the UK, we also have to pander to the criteria which that individual is ‘comfortable’ to share.
    I think I am one of many landlords who’s current tenants will be their last. The government wins. They can bring in their corporate buddies from Thames Water Rentals and get on with it.

Have Your Say

Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.

Not a member yet? Join In Seconds


Login with

or

Related Articles