0:01 AM, 18th July 2025, About 6 months ago 4
Text Size
Categories:
A member of the House of Lords has criticised Right to Rent checks, saying they effectively turn “ordinary landlords into immigration officers.”
In England, the scheme requires landlords and letting agents to verify that all prospective tenants have the legal right to live in the UK before renting out a property.
Baroness Thornhill of the Liberal Democrats pushed for Amendment 115 to the Renters’ Rights Bill, which would abolish Right to Rent checks.
All landlords and their agents in England have a legal responsibility under the Immigration Act 2014 to prevent those without lawful immigration status from accessing the private rented sector.
Under the rules, the government can fine landlords and letting agents for failing to carry out right-to-rent checks. The maximum penalty for a first offence is now £20,000, a sharp increase from the previous £1,000.
Baroness Thornhill has called for the policy to be scrapped, warning that it encourages discrimination and places an unfair burden on landlords.
She said: “The Right to Rent was introduced as a mechanism to make it harder for those without legal status to live and work in the UK, part of the so-called hostile environment. It placed a legal obligation on private landlords to carry out immigration checks before renting out their property, turning them into de facto border officials.
“Landlords and letting agents are ordinary citizens who are neither trained nor equipped to make complex legal determinations. When even the National Residential Landlords Association (NRLA) is saying loudly and clearly that this is not working, you know it is not a good thing. You have to question its ability do what it says on the tin.”
She adds the NRLA warns Right to Rent is unworkable.
She said: “Landlords fear the consequences of getting it wrong, including fines and even prison, they are more likely to play it safe and reject any tenant who does not hold a UK passport. Both the NRLA and Shelter say that one in four landlords believe they can rent only to British passport-holders.
“The fact is that the government have turned ordinary landlords into immigration officers, no training or guidance, just threats of fines and prison sentences if they get it wrong. The resulting discrimination is plainly evident. Let us be clear: this is not just a policy failure; it is a moral failure”
However, despite support from other Peers, Amendment 115 was rejected from the Renters’ Rights Bill.
Baroness Taylor of Stevenage, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Housing, claims there’s insufficient evidence that Right to Rent is discriminatory.
She said: “The scheme has been independently evaluated twice. Although some examples of discriminatory attitudes were found, there was insufficient evidence to claim that there was any systematic, unlawful discrimination as a result of the right-to-rent scheme. There are therefore no current plans to end the scheme.”
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Jo Westlake
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since June 2015 - Comments: 303
9:56 AM, 18th July 2025, About 6 months ago
The Right to Rent Share Code system for international applicants is brilliant.
It’s actually much harder to check a UK national. Most don’t routinely carry their passport with them. They don’t understand they have to provide the evidence we require. The online identity verification is glitchy and unreliable.
moneymanager
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since February 2018 - Comments: 627
11:14 AM, 18th July 2025, About 6 months ago
I gave no problem in deterring anyone with no right to be in this country, would the pantomime horse, masquerading as a government, care to do the same?
Reluctant Landlord
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since September 2018 - Comments: 3380 - Articles: 5
16:02 PM, 18th July 2025, About 6 months ago
to be honest its pretty simple to check the R2R share code on line though I also ask for scanned copy of the biometric card as well.
This gives the actual detail of what ‘leave to remain; is based – ie work permit, dependant working permit etc a what they are/not permitted to do (why is Sportsman always listed???).
The details also highlights if they have recourse to public funds. (always something to consider because if they can claim Legal Aid…..) you know where this is going….
Judith Wordsworth
Read Full Bio
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since January 2015 - Comments: 1371
16:15 PM, 18th July 2025, About 6 months ago
We’ve been UK UNPAID Border/ Immigration Officers and ASBO Officers for many years now.
Yet another reason for getting out of the PRS