8 months ago | 1 comments
As the Labour party conference kicks off this week, an expert has warned the party “not to leave the private rented sector behind.”
LRG’s national lettings managing director, Allison Thompson, has created a party conference wishlist to outline key priorities for the private rented sector.
Ms Thompson says legislation such as the Renters’ Rights Bill, EPC C targets, and the Decent Homes Standard all present opportunities for change but must be done with clear guidance for landlords.
The Renters’ Rights Bill looks set to become law after the party conference and LRG warns landlords need clear guidance from the government over how the bill will be implemented.
She said: “As the Renters’ Rights Bill nears the finish line, what the sector needs now is a clear and practical plan for implementation. The bill marks a significant shift. It ends Section 21, moves all new and existing tenancies to periodic tenancies, tightens the grounds for possession, limits rent increases to once a year, and introduces both a PRS ombudsman and a national property portal.
“These are positive steps. However, success will ultimately depend on how the reforms are implemented. The transition must be carefully phased and underpinned by clear, usable guidance.”
Ms Thompson adds the removal of Section 21 and the new Private Rented Sector Ombudsman must have the right systems in place to operate correctly.
She said: “Removing Section 21 before court systems are ready risks leaving serious cases waiting longer to be heard. The government needs to commit to clear targets for listing times, expand the use of housing-specific court lists, and ensure that digital filing genuinely speeds up the process.
“Second, the switch to periodic tenancies. The plan to move all assured shorthold tenancies over in one step creates a risk of confusion. We need fixed dates, standardised terms, and clear transitional rules, including confirmation that current rent-in-advance arrangements can continue.
“Third, the new ombudsman and property portal. These could drive real change, but only if they’re simple to use. We support a single national data standard and file format, enabling agents to bulk upload portfolios and integrate with existing licensing and enforcement systems. With the right systems in place, compliance becomes the default and renters benefit faster.”
Ms Thompson says LRG supports the Decent Homes Standard but the government must be realistic when it comes to the timescale of repairing properties to meet new standards.
The government has been vague about what the Decent Homes Standard will look like in practice, with rumours suggesting local authorities may have discretion in applying the new rules.
Previously, an article on Property118 suggests the legislation appears to focus on the condition of the premises, provisions for tenant safety and comfort and the ability to maintain an appropriate temperature.
Ms Thompson says: “We support the introduction of a Decent Homes Standard in the private rented sector, but it has to be practical to follow and consistent to enforce. Too many landlords want to do the right thing but are left guessing what’s required.
“The focus should be on fixing the highest risks in older homes. That includes damp and mould, poor insulation and outdated facilities. The government should publish clear guidance on what work is needed, how it’s evidenced, and how long it should take.
“The PRS must not be left behind when it comes to time-bound repairs. But the rollout must be realistic. Align any new duties with the wider rental reform timeline, and give landlords enough time to plan, budget and complete works properly. That is the best way to improve housing quality without creating voids, confusion or unintentional non-compliance.”
LRG also demand the government give more clarity to landlords over the proposed but not yet law EPC C targets for all private rented properties by 2030 and 2028 for new tenancies.
Ms Thompson says the government must be realistic and not penalise landlords who cannot achieve EPC C targets.
Ms Thompson said: “Improving energy efficiency is something the sector supports, but it needs to be delivered in a way that keeps good landlords in the market. If EPC C is the target for 2030, then landlords need clarity now.
“The government should set a single national cost cap, a simple exemption process, and practical guidance that reflects real-world scenarios. This includes guidance for flats where landlords may be limited by lease terms or have shared responsibility for the building’s fabric. The aim should be to get each property as close to C as possible within the cap, rather than penalising landlords where full compliance isn’t physically achievable.”
She adds: “Timing is important. Any changes to energy efficiency rules should align with the rollout of the Decent Homes Standard. Financial support should be easily accessible and include schemes that cater to typical PRS improvements, such as loft insulation and boiler upgrades. EPC data should be linked to the national property portal, so that compliance is visible and enforcement can be focused where it is most needed.
“With the right structure, we can deliver warmer, greener homes without reducing rental supply.”
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
8 months ago | 1 comments
8 months ago | 2 comments
9 months ago | 6 comments
Sorry. You must be logged in to view this form.
Member Since January 2025 - Comments: 57
2:58 AM, 29th September 2025, About 7 months ago
I would argue that a single national cap for EPC C is unfair and the cap should be related to the value of the property/rental income
There is a big difference in spending 15K on a 700K property with a rental income of £2,500pcm compared to spending 15K on a 150K property with a rental of £600pcm
Member Since May 2015 - Comments: 2204 - Articles: 2
11:04 AM, 29th September 2025, About 7 months ago
A similar rationale applies to licencing fees, which should reflect the rental value of the property (or better still abolished).
Member Since September 2023 - Comments: 22
11:27 AM, 29th September 2025, About 7 months ago
I’ve had a few epc’s done since the new rules came in and the requirements to achieve a c rating seem to have eased.
Houses with solid brick walls which would only achieve a d rating before, are being passed as a c now as long as all of the easy boxes are ticked.
How this change helps tenants is beyond me, but if it allows us to keep our properties rented and improve at our convenience (during the ever decreasing voids) then i think its a good thing.
I’m still insulating empty houses to future proof them as the rules can change again.
The upside of the shotage of properties for landlords is better rents and a huge pool of applicants to choose from. My last few adverts all had 50+ good replies. Lots of families in dire need of decent housing, but like many landlords, the days of giving anybody less than perfect a chance are over, due to the increased skewing of rules in favour of tenants.
What a mess successive governments have made of the prs.
Member Since January 2017 - Comments: 113
5:30 PM, 29th September 2025, About 7 months ago
I’ve just had a property re-assessed under the new rules and I’ve lost 8 points! Still a D and no reasonable cost solutions to get up to “C”.
So, in a year or so will likely get re-done AGAIN by a different assessor and if no better, this will be sold off.
Makes me wonder what some of my other properties would score if re-assessed, especially those “C” but only just!
Member Since May 2024 - Comments: 204
7:09 PM, 29th September 2025, About 7 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Billy Gunn at 29/09/2025 – 02:58
Billy Gunn, I tried to raise this point with my MP but just got some generic report back.
I guess anything is possible if the numbers stack up, unfortunately the only house I’ve left that will not be making it to a C is a 120k house that has low rent. Due to construction type, it’s not going to make a C.
I wonder how many tenants would prefer cheap rent and live in a EPC D house instead of being homeless when landlords sell up? Maybe they would be happy paying £2500 a month in rent instead of £500?
Same as renting a car, if I want to rent an expensive car, I’m going to have to pay more for it. Why are houses any different?
Member Since May 2024 - Comments: 204
7:17 PM, 29th September 2025, About 7 months ago
For now most of my houses are now an EPC C, a lot of the UK’s housing stock isn’t, I wonder how many tenants the government are going to make homeless as the landlord can’t and won’t invest 15k in a 60k property without increasing the rent that local housing authority cant afford to pay the rent anymore as said landlord needs to recover his costs.
This said, I try to avoid letting to people on benefits but due to circumstances, I have a lot of good tenants that are claiming benefits, but their rents are very low and not been increased in years.
If I’m suddenly forced to spend 15k on a 60 – 100k house, either the rent is going up to cover the cost or I sell the house.
It’s only going to be the tenants on low income that suffer. The very people that Labor are supposed to represent.
Member Since September 2025 - Comments: 2
12:43 PM, 30th September 2025, About 7 months ago
Had ten properties re-assesed under new EPC rules. All dropped. The suggested ways to achieve EPC are simply not achievable (irrespective of cost). Internal wall insulation – 200mm on each wall, floor insulation (which cannot be done whilst tenants are in the property) and solar panels. It simply cannot work on many of the terraces in Northern Britain