2 years ago | 1 comments
A council is to spend £2.5 million outsourcing its licensing of private rented homes within the city to deal with ‘challenges with staffing and IT infrastructure’.
The decision was made at a recent cabinet meeting after councillors were informed that the council’s current resources were insufficient to maintain in-house licensing.
A report presented to the committee suggested that a private provider could offer more efficient services and potentially save money.
The move was approved during the Wolverhampton City Council meeting.
During the meeting, Councillor Steve Evans, who is responsible for housing, said the authority did not have the staff or IT to carry out the relevant checks.
He told the meeting: “We have got a lot of private rented sector landlords, it’s really important for the city and renters that they are safe in the knowledge that we have fit and proper landlords.”
The successful contractor will be awarded a five-year contract valued at £500,000 annually – to be paid for by the selective licensing fees collected from landlords.
The council aims to achieve cost savings, improved IT systems and efficient documentation verification through this partnership.
By outsourcing the licensing process, Wolverhampton council hopes to free up its resources to focus on enforcement and high-risk properties.
The report highlights that the third party would be responsible for:
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
2 years ago | 1 comments
2 years ago | 1 comments
2 years ago | 12 comments
Sorry. You must be logged in to view this form.
Member Since July 2023 - Comments: 19
9:42 AM, 10th September 2024, About 2 years ago
When they say paid for by those mean old landlords, they really mean, paid for by local increases in rent.
Member Since May 2015 - Comments: 2188 - Articles: 2
10:28 AM, 10th September 2024, About 2 years ago
If an outside contractor can do this, why cannot the council?
Member Since October 2013 - Comments: 1630 - Articles: 3
11:20 AM, 10th September 2024, About 2 years ago
A child could produce a database system for managing the licensing!
Member Since May 2015 - Comments: 2188 - Articles: 2
11:34 AM, 10th September 2024, About 2 years ago
Reply to the comment left by NewYorkie at 10/09/2024 – 11:20
Indeed, a very easy computational task. But is a relational database really needed, surely a simple spreadsheet list will suffice which, using LibreOffice, is free of charge. This grown up child could have a basic system up and running in ten minutes.
Member Since October 2013 - Comments: 1630 - Articles: 3
11:40 AM, 10th September 2024, About 2 years ago
Reply to the comment left by TheMaluka at 10/09/2024 – 11:34
Microsoft offers a free Office 365 product which has all that’s needed for spreadsheet and associated document templates.
Member Since September 2018 - Comments: 3508 - Articles: 5
12:22 PM, 10th September 2024, About 2 years ago
be interesting to see if the sub contracted company is going to use qualified people to actually inspect these properties. Clearly the council can’t even manage to manage the people to input the info so that says to me, then haven’t got the feet on the ground inspecting either….
I expect that the idea of actually inspecting any property that has a licence won’t happen as a matter of course going forward, UNLESS a complaint comes in from a tenant that prompts a visit.
In essence therefore no different then to the existing process in place in councils without SL.
Just how many visits has the sub contractor factored and priced in? One visit for every licence in the term of the licence?
A FOI will be a start to work out just what the detail is of the outsourced council contract is.
So it seems all money gleaned from these SL schemes is going to fund the admin of a private company.
What happens to the licence money already paid to the council before this private contract takes effect?
I am sure tenants facing a rent increase as a result of the cost being passed on are going to be ecstatic!
Member Since September 2018 - Comments: 3508 - Articles: 5
12:28 PM, 10th September 2024, About 2 years ago
By outsourcing the licensing process, Wolverhampton council hopes to free up its resources to focus on enforcement and high-risk properties.
If they are already aware of ‘high risk properties’ why is SL needed? They can seek to enter anytime regardless of a licence or not.
What is meant by high risk anyway – presumable HMO’s which are already licenced independently of SL.
Member Since May 2017 - Comments: 763
12:41 PM, 10th September 2024, About 2 years ago
I wonder what the profit margin will be for the contractor? I’m sure tenants will be delighted with the contractors snout in the trough that they are paying for
Member Since February 2020 - Comments: 360
12:59 PM, 10th September 2024, About 2 years ago
Reply to the comment left by TheMaluka at 10/09/2024 – 10:28
That was my thoughts, but we know that public services tend not to be run well.
Assuming corruption is not the motivation, this could be a good thing for the economy. Why does every council need to duplicate processes, the councils should share outsourced companies that will in theory make things more efficient.
Member Since July 2014 - Comments: 150
1:46 PM, 10th September 2024, About 2 years ago
Corporate entity will have targets and profitability to factor in so will soon be Civil Penalty o’clock.