1 year ago | 65 comments
Angela Rayner claims the Labour government want to work with landlords, but blames Section 21 evictions for having a significant impact on homelessness.
In a meeting with the Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee, Ms Rayner claims the government wants to support landlords in providing “safe and secure homes”.
The Housing Secretary repeated Labour’s government ambition to ban Section 21 evictions and introduce Awaab’s Law to the private rented sector.
In the Select Committee meeting, Ms Rayner says she was ‘hesitant’ to put a timeline on when the government wants to end homelessness but claims Section 21 evictions are a contributing factor.
Ms Rayner said: “I think it’s really challenging to set out a timeline to end homelessness, given the challenges we face with the inheritance from the Conservatives and the current projections for homelessness.
“One of the biggest issues we have to address is Section 21 no-fault evictions, which are having a significant impact on homelessness.”
However, Ms Rayner did not provide evidence to support this claim.
The English Housing Survey Private Rented Sector report for 2021-2022 reveals the majority of renters (77%) ended their last tenancy because they wanted to move NOT because of eviction.
Ms Rayner also told the Select Committee meeting that the government wants to work with landlords to improve housing standards.
The Housing Secretary criticised a small minority of landlords, blaming them for providing homes that were unsuitable for tenants. She said:
She said: “People are living in housing that is not good for their health, but they are too frightened to raise the alarm. This is not adequate.
“As soon as they raise concerns, they are served a Section 21 notice by the landlord, who then finds someone else willing to move in and accept the squalor they’re being put in.
“I must say, though, that not all landlords are like that. There are some incredibly decent landlords out there.
“The Decent Homes Standard and Awaab’s Law that we are introducing are about making sure we can support people living in safe and secure housing, while acknowledging that there are significant numbers of people who are not just in temporary accommodation, but in housing that is not safe for them at the moment.
“We want to work with landlords to make sure they can bring their homes up to standards.
“This isn’t about landlords being bad; this is about acknowledging that we have a housing crisis, and it’s not just about building homes, but making sure the homes we have currently are fit for human habitation.”
Elsewhere during the meeting, Ms Rayner said the government is determined to meet the 1.5 million homes target set by the government for this Parliament.
The Housing Secretary also committed to leasehold reform this year.
She said: “We want to make sure we are moving at pace, but we also want to ensure there aren’t unintended consequences. There are gaps in the current legislation that could cause problems, such as the inclusion of flats.
“We want to bring forward legislation within this year.”
Timothy Douglas, head of policy and campaigns at Propertymark, said: “It is encouraging to hear that the UK Government intends to progress with leasehold reform and that they are committed to making common holding a default position for many.
“Propertymark welcomes Ms Rayner’s pledge to introduce the Planning and Infrastructure Bill in March and we look forward to working with them on meeting their ambitious target of constructing 1.5 million new homes.
“However, while the Housing Secretary is intent on scrapping Section 21, which she believes is the answer to ending homelessness, it is essential there is full clarity from the UK Government on how it intends to address issues which Propertymark has highlighted, such as the anticipated backlog it will cause within the courts system.”
You can watch a clip of Angela Rayner at the committee meeting here
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Next Article
2025: The year for cladding compensation
1 year ago | 65 comments
1 year ago | 28 comments
1 year ago | 1 comments
Sorry. You must be logged in to view this form.
Member Since May 2018 - Comments: 2025
4:41 PM, 20th February 2026, About 2 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Kevyn Jones at 20/02/2026 – 14:14
You are right that stamp duty is a deterrent to downsizing…also to moving for work…it’s a drag on the economy. Inheritance tax acts not just as a deterrent to downsizing, but also as a deterrent to improving the energy efficiency of a property, when instead the IHT regime could be amended to provide an incentive to improve a property.
And whilst there are some benefits to the rent-a-room-scheme, as you point out there are also significant risks, especially for the elderly and the unwary trying to ‘do the right thing’.
Member Since March 2023 - Comments: 1506
9:18 AM, 21st February 2026, About 2 months ago
Yes, S21 IS a cause of homelessness. However that may be the landlord selling up or the tenant not paying rent .
So what, nobody has the right to permanently occupy a property owned by a private sector landlord – otherwise why would the landlord bother. The days of double digit profit margins are long gone..
Ultimately it is the government problem to house people. Seems like the government want their cake and to eat it (and to tax it as well).
Member Since July 2013 - Comments: 2002 - Articles: 21
10:40 AM, 23rd February 2026, About 2 months ago
Reply to the comment left by GlanACC at 09:18
No, s21 is not a cause of homelessness. The claim that it is is a post hoc fallacy. (Post hoc, ergo propter hoc. After this, therefore because of this.) It is true that many people who are homeless received a s21 notice. However, that is not why there is homelessness. Ask a simple question. Suppose a tenant received a s21 notice and had to leave. Suppose also that there were other suitable and affordable homes to rent in the vicinity. Would that tenant become homeless? The answer is obvious. It is the shortage of housing not s21 notices that leads to homelessness.
An exacerbating factor now is that the property the evicted tenant was in would, in the past, be let to another tenant. Now, with all the anti-landlord legislation, some landlords will keep their properties empty. Even if only a small number do, every such property withdrawn from the market makes matters worse.
Member Since March 2023 - Comments: 1506
12:07 PM, 23rd February 2026, About 2 months ago
So issuing an S21 does cause homelessness as if the tenant cant get another property they would in the strict sense of the meaning be homeless.
I am not blackening landlords as I myself have issued a number of S21’s and really don’t care what happens to the tenant. I know that one single mum and kid I evicted went into temporary accomodation, so I guess my S21 did make them homeless. Mind you, it was their own fault for not paying the rent.
Member Since January 2024 - Comments: 351
12:11 PM, 23rd February 2026, About 2 months ago
Reply to the comment left by GlanACC at 23/02/2026 – 12:07
s21 didn’t make them homeless, lack of alternative affordable housing did.
Member Since March 2023 - Comments: 1506
12:14 PM, 23rd February 2026, About 2 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Ryan Stevens at 23/02/2026 – 12:11
I think you are nit picking, yes they made themseleves homeless by not paying the rent. This doesn’t apply when issuing an S21 for selling the property though – the tenant may through no fault of his own be able to get another property
Member Since January 2024 - Comments: 351
12:58 PM, 23rd February 2026, About 2 months ago
Reply to the comment left by GlanACC at 23/02/2026 – 12:14
So now landlords are forced to use S8, when s21 was already there doing the same job.
It is just kicking the can down the road, the government will be relying on court delays to reduce homelessness stats. But that same tenant will still be homeless, and may be in a worse position if the landlord has to get a CCJ for unpaid rent, etc.
Member Since March 2023 - Comments: 1506
1:46 PM, 23rd February 2026, About 2 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Ryan Stevens at 23/02/2026 – 12:58
To be honest, I am not really bothered by that. I don’t intend getting rid of my remaining tenants unless they fail to pay the rent. When they leave I will sell
Member Since July 2013 - Comments: 2002 - Articles: 21
2:21 PM, 23rd February 2026, About 2 months ago
Reply to the comment left by GlanACC at 23/02/2026 – 12:07
Look up “post hoc fallacy”. The tenant becomes homeless because they cannot find another property that is affordable. They can’t get another property because there are too few properties available. The last thing the Government should be doing is reducing the supply by driving landlords out. This in turn, coupled with other provisions of the RRA, will lead to higher rents.
Take an analogy. Many unemployed people received a redundancy notice from their former employer. Does that mean redundancy notices cause unemployment? Further, do you tackle unemployment by making it unlawful to issue redundancy notices?
Member Since March 2023 - Comments: 1506
3:31 PM, 23rd February 2026, About 2 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Ian Narbeth at 23/02/2026 – 14:21
I surrender