3 weeks ago | 8 comments
Several published landlord guides are stating the wrong timeframe for responding to tenant pet requests under the Renters’ Rights Act.
The correct answer is 28 days.
Here is what the law says, why the 42-day figure is wrong, and what landlords need to do.
The 42-day window does not appear in the Renters’ Rights Act as enacted.
It appears to have originated from an earlier draft of the Bill as it passed through Parliament, where a longer period was proposed and subsequently amended before Royal Assent.
The final Act — section 11, which inserts new section 16A into the Housing Act 1988 — is clear.
A landlord who receives a written pet request must respond in writing within 28 days.
Missing the 28-day window has two immediate consequences.
First, deemed consent.
If you fail to respond within 28 days, the request is treated as having been granted. You cannot reverse this.
The tenant is entitled to keep the pet regardless of your views on it.
Second, enforcement.
Local housing authorities have investigation and civil penalty powers under the Act.
Penalties for non-compliance can reach £7,000 for a first breach.
A landlord who has read that the window is 42 days and responds on day 35 has already breached the Act and lost the right to refuse.
The pet request process under section 16A is straightforward if you follow it properly.
Yes — but only on specific grounds.
A blanket ‘no pets’ policy is no longer enforceable under the Act.
Valid grounds for refusal include a freeholder or superior lease restriction that prohibits pets, genuine unsuitability of the property for the specific animal requested, or a building management restriction that applies to all occupiers.
Refusal based on a general preference or policy is not valid.
The reasons must be specific and documented in writing.
Yes. Granting consent with conditions is permitted and is generally the most defensible approach.
Note that charging a higher deposit specifically for pets remains prohibited under the Tenant Fees Act 2019 — insurance is the correct mechanism.
There are limited circumstances where the deadline can be extended.
If you need further information from the tenant, for example, details about the breed or size of the animal — you can request this within the 28 days.
You then have 7 days from receiving that information to respond.
If the property is leasehold and you need freeholder consent before you can respond, you must apply to the freeholder within the 28-day window.
You then have 7 days from receiving the freeholder’s decision to respond to your tenant.
The 28-day window is strict. Deemed consent cannot be reversed.
If you are using a template pack or compliance guide that states 42 days, check it now — and check any response letters it provides reference the correct timeframe.
For more information about landlords’ tenant pet requests under the Renters’ Rights Act, visit the DocPilot website for more information.
David Osborne is the founder of DocPilot, which provides UK legal document templates updated for the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 and Employment Rights Act 2025.
Editor’s note: A reference to landlords being able to ask for pet insurance has been removed since this was dropped from the version of the Act that received Royal Assent.
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Previous Article
Why EPC policy will damage the housing sector?
3 weeks ago | 8 comments
1 month ago | 4 comments
1 month ago | 34 comments
Member Since November 2025 - Comments: 6
10:58 AM, 17th June 2026, About 2 weeks ago
Someone stated that we should charge a higher rent for tenants with pets.
Would it be legal then, to advertise two different rent figures, for tenants with, or without pets? Could the rent be increased, after an existing tenant gets a pet?
Member Since October 2020 - Comments: 1243
1:57 PM, 17th June 2026, About 2 weeks ago
Reply to the comment left by Robert Needham at 17/06/2026 – 10:58
The Renters Rights Act says you must advertise “a specific rent” and I suspect the courts would interpret the “a” as singular. However it wouldn’t really help you anyway. You can advertise “no pets” and you can reject an applicant that has a pet, so you would only face the issue when an existing tenant requests a pet, which you must then consider. So if you’d advertised 2 different rents, they’d be paying the lower non-pet rent at that point and the only mechanism for increasing rent is the s13 process. So the higher advertised rent could never apply.
Member Since November 2025 - Comments: 6
4:02 PM, 17th June 2026, About 2 weeks ago
Reply to the comment left by DPT at 17/06/2026 – 13:57
Thanks
Member Since June 2026 - Comments: 1 - Articles: 1
9:44 AM, 18th June 2026, About 2 weeks ago
Reply to the comment left by DPT at 15/06/2026 – 18:06
“You’re right, and thanks for flagging it twice. I’ve checked this against the Tenant Fees Act 2019 and the earlier Bill drafts — pet insurance was in an earlier version of the Bill but removed before Royal Assent, so requiring it as a condition of consent is a prohibited fee. I’ve corrected the Pet Permission Letter and the Response Pack to reflect this — they now use a damage liability and cleaning standard clause instead, with an explicit note that insurance can’t be required. I can’t edit the article text directly, but the correction is noted here for anyone reading the thread. Appreciate you catching it.”
Member Since March 2020 - Comments: 3
2:19 PM, 20th June 2026, About 1 week ago
Did i read something on here last week stating that a dog needs freedom to wander and should not be locked up in one room. So if a kitchen has a fire door closer on it and possibly other doors for compliance then this would be deemed unsuitable?