1 week ago | 15 comments
by Mick Roberts
Police interceptors wouldn’t fine me £7,000 for no MOT, so why would the government fine me for having an MOT?
Driving without a valid MOT can result in a standard £100 fixed penalty, although the fine can be up to £1,000. By comparison, certain PRS database breaches can result in penalties of up to £7,000.
Yes, I can have the boiler certificate, EPC, EICR, all perfectly legal, but woe betide me if I make an admin error and forget to send it to the government, because that could land me a £7,000 fine.
That’s a potential penalty up to seven times higher than the maximum court fine for driving without an MOT.
We all know that cars with no MOT can be dangerous and can kill someone. That’s why, when you MOT your car, the result automatically goes onto a database. The police can check it instantly while they’re driving behind you.
Yet apparently houses are more dangerous. Why? Because the government says so.
If they think a £7,000 fine is justified for not putting your boiler certificate on the database, even though you have actually got the certificate, then surely a car with no MOT should be fined more than £7,000, shouldn’t it?
You can have the boiler certificate. You can have everything legal. You’ve just messed up on your admin because all these new retrospective rules are overtaking you.
If this is so serious that it justifies a £7,000 fine, why aren’t the boiler certificates put onto a database automatically?
Now, with EPCs, we all know they do automatically get put onto the government website.
Those who have already uploaded these documents to councils that have selective licensing schemes, why do they have to do the same again?
Because it’s the same councils that have been put in charge of administering the database scheme, and the same councils that will be fining landlords for not uploading the certificate.
Do the government not get what they are doing with these constant threats?
Landlords are packing up. We’re not taking risky, vulnerable tenants. We’re neglecting the house and the tenant because the government and councils are taking our time and funds that would have gone on the house.
Do the government not get that this is an extra £6 a month on top of the rent?
And before you say, “well, it’s only a bit more admin,” read all the changes landlords have faced since 2015 and then tell me the government aren’t beating the landlord down and why rents are so expensive. I’ve written more about this here.
The rogue landlords are still going to ignore this like they have done with selective licensing.
Article by Mick Roberts, one of Nottingham’s largest landlords to house benefit tenants.
21 comments on this article
A different perspective could help you spot an issue, avoid a mistake or find a better way forward. Read the comments and add your own views if you wish.
Previous Article
Scottish landlords face new repair deadlines
1 week ago | 15 comments
2 weeks ago | 14 comments
3 weeks ago | 35 comments
Member Since May 2025 - Comments: 92
6:51 PM, 6th October 2026, About 5 days ago
The new database won’t catch the biggest rogue landlords – the government is the biggest rogue landlord. Most disrepair claims are against council houses. The stats for my local council show they have rented properties missing gas safety certificates…really! II will use Labour logic – if the councils were fined for all these breaches it would raise enough to give everyone a tax cut!!
Member Since November 2020 - Comments: 144
12:32 AM, 7th October 2026, About 5 days ago
Reply to the comment left by Tiger at 06/10/2026 – 14:55
“Noone takes them to task.”
I don’t think blaming Herman (Peter Noone of Herman’s Hermits) is right. It’s not his fault.
Member Since July 2013 - Comments: 2066 - Articles: 21
11:46 AM, 7th October 2026, About 4 days ago
From the Times newspaper Labour shelves £800m on repairs to ‘dilapidated’ military housing
https://www.thetimes.com/uk/defence/article/labour-repairs-military-housing-cuts-budget-th25shbz2
“14,000 properties were in such poor condition that they needed knocking down or comprehensive floor-to-ceiling renovation.”
Antony Cotton, an armed forces advocate said: “Some of those houses were built 80 years ago, to last no more than 20 years. I’ve been in houses that have no insulation. They are literally a brick wall with plaster board on the inside of it. Prisoners would not be housed as badly.” and “A soldier, an aviator, a sailor or a marine should … not be thinking about whether their child’s bedroom has mould crawling up the walls.”
I wonder how many of these houses have an EPC of E or above. I expect the military is not subject to Awaab’s law. Two tier justice for landlords!
Member Since June 2013 - Comments: 3347 - Articles: 83
12:26 PM, 7th October 2026, About 4 days ago
Reply to the comment left by Ian Narbeth at 07/10/2026 – 11:46
Disgusting in’t in Ian. An hour documentary we need on TV to show what this Govt are like & they & the Councils have done to tenants via Landlords.
Member Since May 2018 - Comments: 2550
1:26 PM, 7th October 2026, About 4 days ago
Reply to the comment left by Mick Roberts at 07/10/2026 – 12:26
That’s almost…but not quite a good summary of what this government is like. This government is fundamentally dishonest. For example, they keep on saying they are going to fix the housing problem with council houses. But labour has not built a significant number of new COUNCIL houses under their current government. Council houses represent 2,811 out of 73,600 homes built, i.e. less than 4% of new homes built have been council houses.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/labour-council-house-building-burnham-funding-b3039457.html
The government came to power saying they had to deliver economic growth; this is a market where 90% of employment is in small business and where it is general common knowledge that after the 2008 crash 90% of the growth in employment also came from small business. And what labour did immediately after they came to power was to punish both employers for employing people and investors for investing in the UK economy. What fool would do that?
This government consistently SAYS one thing but DOES something else. The Renters Rights Act is a disaster and labour’s proposals for a landlord database, if it goes ahead, would make the situation even worse than it is now.
Despite what the government keeps saying, it was always obvious to anybody who wasn’t either a liar or an idiot that labour didn’t have the money to fix the housing problem with council houses.
Member Since June 2013 - Comments: 3347 - Articles: 83
3:04 PM, 7th October 2026, About 4 days ago
Reply to the comment left by Beaver at 07/10/2026 – 13:26
Yep, to please voters. There is a few people now saying the Renters Right Act needs to be scrapped. Let’s hope so before too many lose their homes.
Member Since October 2022 - Comments: 275
5:41 PM, 7th October 2026, About 4 days ago
Reply to the comment left by Suspicious Steve at 06/10/2026 – 18:51
Except the councils would effectively be fining themselves!
Member Since July 2013 - Comments: 2066 - Articles: 21
10:33 AM, 8th October 2026, About 3 days ago
Reply to the comment left by Mick Roberts at 15:04
Mick, I agree the Renters’ Rights Act is terrible but it is just the Tories’ Renters’ Reform Bill with some added pain and a few elephant traps for landlords. Michael Gove and numerous other allegedly conservative MPs were seduced by the claim that s21 causes homelessness. They are now discovering that a shortage of properties to rent causes homelessness.
I feel sorry for those tenants who thought the RRA would help.
Member Since June 2013 - Comments: 3347 - Articles: 83
11:01 AM, 8th October 2026, About 3 days ago
Reply to the comment left by Ian Narbeth at 08/10/2026 – 10:33
You telling me Elephant traps. There’s always something to trip u up & catch us out. Getting fined £7000 cause I got a date wrong from 10 years ago?
It’s ridiculous, it needs looking at. Lot of us are good people who are housing people that the Council & Govt can’t. We genuinely aren’t bad people-And you want to fine us £7000? Cause you know a landlord who was a bad person?
Member Since May 2018 - Comments: 2550
11:55 AM, 8th October 2026, About 3 days ago
Reply to the comment left by Mick Roberts at 08/10/2026 – 11:01
This is absolutely right. The government is letting out criminals early because it hasn’t got enough prison places. At the same time through its Renters Rights Act (and shortly via its landlord database) the government is criminalising a group of people who for the most part have been doing something socially-useful, something the government needs because the citizens of the UK need it…investment in housing.
Over the same period that this labour government has been in power, less than 4% of the houses built have been council houses. But the government persists with the lie that they are going to fix the housing problem by building council houses and 1.5 million new homes. It’s all just lies. The numbers are obvious and the money markets understand them.