Rachel 'Double Standards' Reeves rented out family home without a selective licence

Rachel ‘Double Standards’ Reeves rented out family home without a selective licence

Chancellor Rachel Reeves faces ethics probe over rental licence breach
9:31 AM, 30th October 2025, 6 months ago 124

The Chancellor, Rachel Reeves, has referred herself to the government’s ethics watchdog after admitting she broke housing law by renting out her family home without a selective licence.

She admitted to the breach after questions were raised over her Dulwich property, which was listed for rent at £3,200 a month when she moved into Number 11 Downing Street with her family last year.

That’s despite Ms Reeves campaigning last year for selective licensing to be imposed on her Leeds constituency.

Southwark Council operates a selective licensing scheme that requires landlords in some areas, including Ms Reeves’s neighbourhood, to obtain a licence before letting their homes.

The council confirmed that her property fell within the designated zone.

Its website states: “You can be prosecuted or fined if you’re a landlord or managing agent for a property that needs a licence and do not get one.”

Rented out through an agent

After inquiries by the Daily Mail, the Chancellor acknowledged she had not been aware of the rule and took immediate steps to apply for the licence.

Her spokesman said: “Since becoming Chancellor, Rachel Reeves has rented out her family home through a lettings agency.

“She had not been made aware of the licensing requirement, but as soon as it was brought to her attention, she took immediate action and has applied for the licence.”

He added that she had informed the Prime Minister, the Independent Adviser on Ministerial Standards, and the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards ‘in the spirit of transparency’.

Calls to sack Reeves

Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch described the revelations as ‘very serious’ and called for the Chancellor to be sacked.

She said: “If the Chancellor, who has spent months floating punishing tax hikes on family homes, has at the same time seemingly been profiting from illegally renting out her house, that would make her position extremely tenuous.

“The Prime Minister must launch a full investigation.”

Ms Badenoch added: “He once said, ‘lawmakers can’t be lawbreakers’.

“If, as it appears, the Chancellor has broken the law, then he will have to show he has the backbone to act.”

‘One rule for the Chancellor’

A Conservative party spokesperson today said: “Rachel Reeves has broken the law and broken the ministerial code, but Keir Starmer is too weak to sack her.

“While the Chancellor is planning tax hikes for millions of families across the country at the Budget, it’s one rule for the Chancellor and another for everyone else.”

The Chancellor apparently told the Prime Minister in a letter and also apologised to him.

However, Keir Starmer said an investigation was ‘not necessary’ after consulting with Sir Laurie Magnus, the independent ethics adviser.

The Prime Minister added: “I am satisfied that this matter can be drawn to a close following your apology.”

Rachel Reeves has committed a strict liability crime

Editor’s Note from Phil Turtle at Landlord Licensing & Defence: Rachel Reeves has committed a strict liability crime under section 95 of the Housing Act 2004 (failure to licence a property) with unlimited fines if prosecuted in court. Alternatively, councils can issue a civil financial penalty up to £30,000 (and keep the money).

Councils treat this as one of the most heinous crimes possible and we see dozens of small landlords every week fined often between £12,000 to £20,000 for this exact same criminal offence.

Just like speeding, it is a strict liability crime and there is no defence of “I didn’t know” or my letting agent didn’t tell me. Councils are absolutely merciless in prosecuting small landlords because for them, fining landlords has become a major revenue stream.

Will Reeve’s apology get her off the hook? It certainly wouldn’t get any one else who rented out their former family home and didn’t licence it. Council’s see these landlords as low hanging fruit for their revenue.

And let’s be clear we see hundreds of examples each month where councils leave tenants in danger whilst they concentrate on getting their pound of flesh from the landlord. Note councils concentrate on small landlords not the real rogues because hey never actually get cash from the rogues!

The whole licensing and enforcement environment in private sector housing is toxic and corrupt. (“Dear Council: keep as much fine money as you can raise” was never going to lead to a fair system and has in fact become an effective land grab as councils take ever bigger slices of the equity of small landlords.)

Also councils go out of their way to persuade tenants to make a rent Repayment Order for 12-months rent back (shortly to be 24-months under the new Renters Reform Act.

Will the full merciless weight of the law with civil penalty fines and rent repayment orders bear down on our chancellor as it does on every other landlord who didn’t realise they needed a licence?

We wait with bated breath – and of course Landlord Licensing & Defence would be happy to defend Ms Reeves to the full extent the law allows!

As we do for every landlord what falls foul of the horrendous housing enforcement fiasco https://landlordsdefence.co.uk/pr10

Taking Control Before Councils Do

For most landlords, this story underlines how easy it is to fall foul of licensing rules without even realising. Every council has its own schemes, boundaries, and exemptions. Some require licensing for all rented properties, others only within selective zones, and each carries severe penalties for non-compliance.

The real lesson here is that ignorance is never accepted as an excuse. Whether you use a letting agent or manage properties yourself, the legal duty sits squarely with the landlord. Councils now rely on licensing income to fund enforcement teams, so the chances of being caught are higher than ever.

This is why we advise landlords to treat compliance checks as part of their annual maintenance routine. Verify whether your properties sit inside new or extended licensing areas, confirm that your agent’s details and licences are current, and keep every confirmation on file. One missing certificate can quickly snowball into a fine, rent repayment order, and lasting reputational damage.

Property118’s consultants often help landlords take a broader view of compliance. For some, this means consolidating their portfolio into a company or LLP structure where governance and record-keeping are centralised. For others, it means refining how agents are appointed, instructed, and monitored. In every case, the goal is the same: preparation, control, and peace of mind.

When public opinion turns against landlords, the best defence is professionalism. Staying one step ahead of local authority schemes is not only self-protection, it’s part of proving that responsible landlords form the backbone of the UK housing market.


Share This Article

Comments

  • Member Since May 2024 - Comments: 47

    11:09 AM, 30th October 2025, About 6 months ago

    Reply to the comment left by Jason at 30/10/2025 – 10:46
    She will probably end up having to resign and then like Raynor, get a large pay out to compensate for loss of ministerial earnings to help pay towards her fine… assuming she’s issue with one.

  • Member Since January 2017 - Comments: 113

    11:09 AM, 30th October 2025, About 6 months ago

    Reeves can afford to pay any fine and move on. Which would be the obvious way to go.

    However, many of the small time landlords now struggling to make a living from the business would potential go under from these reported large fines.

  • Member Since August 2016 - Comments: 1190

    11:10 AM, 30th October 2025, About 6 months ago

    We only have her word that she used an agent. What’s that worth ?

  • Member Since May 2018 - Comments: 2025

    11:11 AM, 30th October 2025, About 6 months ago

    Reply to the comment left by Keith Wellburn at 30/10/2025 – 11:03
    Whatever Kier Starmer says, if any landlord who didn’t know that a selective licence was required for a property and didn’t have one has ever been fined for the breach then Rachel Reeves should also be fined for this breach. Otherwise it’s one rule for socialist ministers and another rule for everybody else.

    Labour politicians were quick enough to criticise Boris Johnson for parties at Downing Street when everyone else was in lockdown. Or Dominic Cummings driving off to see family in the North when we weren’t supposed to be travelling. It can’t be one rule for any landlord and a different rule for anybody who is a Kier Starmer acolyte.

  • Member Since July 2013 - Comments: 2002 - Articles: 21

    11:27 AM, 30th October 2025, About 6 months ago

    Reply to the comment left by Dylan Morris at 30/10/2025 – 10:55
    Dylan
    She would be unbelievably foolish and reckless to say she used an agent if she hadn’t. She has a very busy job – albeit one she is doing badly – and it would be entirely reasonable and sensible to use an agent. She and her husband are unlikely to travel from Downing Street to south London to conduct viewings and arrange check in.

    By all means question her conduct but making unfounded allegations of lying allows her and her supporters to deflect attention.

    What is of interest is whether the Mail finds her tenants and encourages them to seek a Rent Repayment Order in addition to pressing the Council to fine her.

  • Member Since August 2021 - Comments: 307 - Articles: 1

    11:29 AM, 30th October 2025, About 6 months ago

    Reply to the comment left by Keith Wellburn at 30/10/2025 – 11:03
    Clearly the PMs acceptance speech promise to break down silo mentality in government didn’t register with cabinet members.

    Housing Secretary could have consulted Treasury
    Chancellor should have spoken to Housing

    I guess she could claim online platforms are agents.

    If it really was an agent, will this prompt the Government to finally implement Lord Best’s 2019 recommendations in the PoPA (regulation of Property Agents) report?
    https://blog.goodlord.co/your-guide-to-proposed-regulation-of-property-agents

    Let’s send Red Ed round to check her EPC and see if he can arrange government standard insulation to devalue her property.

    While he’s at it, he could chivvy his team along and release the final EPC/MEES requirements; after all, COP’s on the agenda next month.

  • Member Since January 2020 - Comments: 134

    11:30 AM, 30th October 2025, About 6 months ago

    Some of the comments here are plain ridiculous.

    It would be sensible to reserve judgment until finding out whether RR let out her property via 1) a reputable agent, 2) an obvious cowboy, or 3) did she go the DIY route?

    If 1) she should be fined (if that’s what the council would ordinarily do) and sue the agent.

    if 2) she should be fined and stand down as chancellor.

    If 3) she should be fined and stand down as both chancellor and MP as she has lied.

  • Member Since August 2016 - Comments: 1190

    11:34 AM, 30th October 2025, About 6 months ago

    Reply to the comment left by Ian Narbeth at 30/10/2025 – 11:27
    Exactly she is foolish and reckless. Look at how she is running the economy. She could well by lying just like Angela Raynor did. She lied about having received legal advice when she hadn’t. It needs to be proved whether she’s lying or not. I’m not saying she is, I have no proof of it obviously. All I’m saying is that it wouldn’t surprise me if she was lying.

  • Member Since August 2021 - Comments: 307 - Articles: 1

    11:35 AM, 30th October 2025, About 6 months ago

    Reply to the comment left by Ian Narbeth at 30/10/2025 – 11:27
    Hopefully, the prospect of local elections next spring will help Southwark’s cabinet minister for housing come to the correct decision regarding prosecution or fine for non-compliant landlord – rogue / criminal / negligent / uninformed – it doesn’t matter; no-one is above the law.

  • Member Since October 2019 - Comments: 400

    11:45 AM, 30th October 2025, About 6 months ago

    With the amount of rental income from a London based property she could easily afford the fines – so what’s the problem?

Have Your Say

Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.

Not a member yet? Join In Seconds


Login with

or

Related Articles